Cited by 220Treatment of Major DepressionNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Pilot Trial of the Oral Selective NR2B Antagonist MK-0657 in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Major Depressive Disorder

Open access
Ibrahim, Lobna, DiazGranados, Nancy, Jolkovsky, Libby, Brutsche, Nancy, Luckenbaugh, David A, Herring, W. Joseph, Potter, William Z., Zarate, Carlos A.·2012·Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Converging lines of evidence suggest that the glutamatergic system may play an increasingly important role in the development of novel therapeutics for major depressive disorder (MDD), particularly agents associated with rapid antidepressant effects. Diverse glutamatergic modulators targeting N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors have shown efficacy in MDD, but their associated psychotomimetic effects presently preclude their use in larger samples. This small, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover pilot study evaluated the potential antidepressant efficacy and tolerability of an oral formulation of the selective N-methyl-D-aspartate NR2B antagonist MK-0657 in patients with treatment-resistant MDD (TRD). The TRD subjects underwent a 1-week drug-free period and were subsequently randomized to receive either MK-0657 monotherapy (4-8 mg/d) or placebo for 12 days. Because of recruitment challenges and the discontinuation of the compound's development by the manufacturer, only 5 of the planned 21 patients completed both periods of the crossover administration of MK-0657 and placebo. Significant antidepressant effects were observed as early as day 5 in patients receiving MK-0657 compared with those receiving placebo, as assessed by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Beck Depression Inventory; however, no improvement was noted when symptoms were assessed with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, the primary efficacy measure. No serious or dissociative adverse effects were observed in patients receiving this oral formulation of MK-0657. Despite the small sample size, this pilot study suggests that an oral formulation of the NR2B antagonist MK-0657 may have antidepressant properties in TRD patients. Further studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to confirm these preliminary findings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/jcp.0b013e31825d70d6

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other exploratory antidepressant compounds that exemplify NMDAR antagonism without ketamine's associated psychotomimetic and dissociative properties include memantine, lanicemine, and CERC 301.

    “Other exploratory AD compounds that exemplify NMDAR antagonism without ketamine’s associated psychotomimetic and dissociative properties include memantine [131], lanicemine [142], and CERC 301 [143].”
  • MK-0657 induced modest improvement in mood scores (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, but not Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale), 5 days but not 1-4 days following a single infusion.

    “Another GluN2B-preferring NMDAR antagonist, MK-0657 (CERC-301), induced modest improvement in mood scores in depressed patients (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, but not the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale), 5 days, but not 1–4 days, following a single infusion 85.”

    From Mechanisms of ketamine action as an antidepressant (2018) · cites this paper as [85]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [15]First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Patient Edition (SCID-I/P) New York New York State Psychiatric Institute, Biometrics Research 2001
  2. [19]Beck AT Beamesderfer A Assessment of depression: the depression inventory Mod Probl Pharmacopsychiatry 1974 7 151 169 4412100
  3. [20]Aitken RC Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales Proc R Soc Med 1969 62 10 989 993 4899510 PMC1810824
  4. [28]Max MB Gallin JI Small clinical trials Principles and Practice of Clinical Research New York, NY Academic Press 2002 207 224
  5. [31]Mallinckrodt CH Meyers AL Prakash A Simple options for improving signal detection in antidepressant clinical trials Psychopharmacol Bull 2007 40 101 114 17514189
  6. [32]Bech P Allerup P Gram LF The Hamilton depression scale. Evaluation of objectivity using logistic models Acta Psychiatr Scand 1981 63 290 299 7015793

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ibrahim, L., DiazGranados, N., Jolkovsky, L., Brutsche, N., Luckenbaugh, D. A., Herring, W. J., Potter, W. Z., & Zarate, C. A.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ibrahim, Lobna
  • DiazGranados, Nancy
  • Jolkovsky, Libby
  • Luckenbaugh, David A
  • Zarate, Carlos A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology
Published
2012-08
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
551-557
ISSN
0271-0749 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095159395
Cited by
220
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 4
FWCI
15.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (ZIAMH002857)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
antidepressant efficacy, glutamatergic system, NMDA receptor modulation, oral dosage forms, rapid antidepressant effects, tolerability
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adolescent, Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Piperidines, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Pyrimidines, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Cross-Over Studies, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review