Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dietary patterns, Mediterranean diet, and cardiovascular disease

Martinez-Gonzalez, Miguel Angel, Bes-Rastrollo, Maira·2014·Current Opinion in Lipidology
DOI 10.1097/mol.0000000000000044
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The objective of this manuscript was to review the evidence on the association between adherence to a Mediterranean diet (MeDiet) and the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). We also updated the results of the last available meta-analysis. RECENT FINDINGS: In 2013, a landmark study in the field, the PREvención con DIeta MEDiterránea randomized trial, with 7447 high-risk participants, published its final results. They provided a strong support to the beneficial role of a traditional MeDiet for primary cardiovascular prevention. When these results were combined with those of the Lyon Diet Heart Study (a secondary prevention trial), we found that an intervention with a MeDiet was associated with a 38% relative reduction in the risk of CVD clinical events (pooled random-effects risk ratio: 0.62; 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.45-0.85). Regarding observational studies assessing clinical end-points as outcome, we identified seven new cohort studies published after the last meta-analysis. After removing studies that only assessed fatal outcomes, a two-point increase in adherence to the MeDiet (0-9 score) was associated with a significant reduction in cardiovascular events (pooled risk ratio: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.85-0.90) with no evidence of heterogeneity. SUMMARY: Consistent evidence suggests that the promotion of the Mediterranean dietary pattern is an effective and feasible tool for the prevention of CVD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mol.0000000000000044

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Stampfer, 2000, N Engl J Med, 343, 16, 10.1056/NEJM200007063430103 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Hu, 2002, Curr Opin Lipidol, 13, 3, 10.1097/00041433-200202000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Tracy, 2013, N Engl J Med, 368, 1274, 10.1056/NEJMp1302616 · DOI
  4. Sofi, 2010, Am J Clin Nutr, 92, 1189, 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29673 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Mente, 2009, Arch Intern Med, 169, 659, 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.38 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Willett, 1995, Am J Clin Nutr, 61, S1402, 10.1093/ajcn/61.6.1402S · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bach, 2006, Public Health Nutr, 9, 132, 10.1079/PHN2005936 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Trichopoulou, 2003, N Engl J Med, 26, 2599, 10.1056/NEJMoa025039 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Moher, 2009, PLoS Med, 6, e1000097, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · DOI · Paper page
  10. De Lorgeril, 1999, Circulation, 99, 779, 10.1161/01.CIR.99.6.779 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Horton, 2005, Lancet, 366, 354, 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67006-7 · DOI
  12. Rees, 2013, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 8, CD009825
  13. Tognon, 2012, J Nutr, 142, 1547, 10.3945/jn.112.160499 · DOI
  14. Gardener, 2011, Am J Clin Nutr, 94, 1458, 10.3945/ajcn.111.012799 · DOI
  15. Misirli, 2012, Am J Epidemiol, 176, 1185, 10.1093/aje/kws205 · DOI
  16. Hoevenaar-Blom, 2012, PLoS One, 7, e45458, 10.1371/journal.pone.0045458 · DOI
  17. Menotti, 2012, Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis, 22, 369, 10.1016/j.numecd.2010.08.002 · DOI
  18. Buckland, 2009, Am J Epidemiol, 170, 1518, 10.1093/aje/kwp282 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Martinez-Gonzalez, 2011, Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis, 21, 237, 10.1016/j.numecd.2010.11.005 · DOI
  20. Howard, 2006, JAMA, 295, 655, 10.1001/jama.295.6.655 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Despres, 2013, Nat Rev Cardiol, 10, 184, 10.1038/nrcardio.2013.16 · DOI
  22. Maillot, 2011, Am J Clin Nutr, 94, 1127, 10.3945/ajcn.111.016501 · DOI
  23. Serra-Majem, 2009, Br J Nutr, 101, S21, 10.1017/S0007114509990559 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Martinez-Gonzalez, M. A., & Bes-Rastrollo, M.
Venue
Current Opinion in Lipidology
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2014-02
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
20-26
ISSN
0957-9672 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1097/mol.0000000000000044
OpenAlex
W1993039343
Cited by
273
References
9
FWCI
28.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.