Cited by 41Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and ResearchNerve injury and regenerationFacial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques

Update in facial nerve paralysis: tissue engineering and new technologies

Open access
Langhals, Nicholas B., Urbanchek, Melanie G., Ray, Amrita, Brenner, Michael J.·2014·Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To present the recent advances in the treatment of facial paralysis, emphasizing the emerging technologies. This review will summarize the current state of the art in the management of facial paralysis and discuss the advances in nerve regeneration, facial reanimation, and use of novel biomaterials. This review includes surgical innovations in reinnervation and reanimation as well as progress with bioelectrical interfaces. RECENT FINDINGS: The last decade has witnessed major advances in the understanding of nerve injury and approaches for management. Key innovations include strategies to accelerate nerve regeneration, provide tissue-engineered constructs that may replace nonfunctional nerves, approaches to influence axonal guidance, limiting of donor-site morbidity, and optimization of functional outcomes. Approaches to muscle transfer continue to evolve, and new technologies allow for electrical nerve stimulation and use of artificial tissues. SUMMARY: The fields of biomedical engineering and facial reanimation increasingly intersect, with innovative surgical approaches complementing a growing array of tissue engineering tools. The goal of treatment remains the predictable restoration of natural facial movement, with acceptable morbidity and long-term stability. Advances in bioelectrical interfaces and nanotechnology hold promise for widening the window for successful treatment intervention and for restoring both lost neural inputs and muscle function.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/moo.0000000000000062

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [25]Tzou CH Chuang DC Chen HY Cortical Adaptation Staging System: A New and Simple Staging for Result Evaluation of Functioning Free-Muscle Transplantation for Facial Reanimation Ann Plast Surg 2013 25054193 This article presents a new 5-stage evaluation process for FFMT and cortical adaption. It may provide a simple, accurate and reliable alternative to the popular House-Brackmann staging.
  2. [26]McDonnall DWPD An Implantable Neuroprosthesis for Facial Reanimation Boston International Facial Nerve Symposium
  3. [42]Musick KM Chew DJ Fawcett JW Lacour SP PDMS microchannel regenerative peripheral nerve interface Neural Engineering (NER), 2013 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on 2013 649 652
  4. [43]Irina IS Richard JAvW Wim LCR In vivo testing of a 3D bifurcating microchannel scaffold inducing separation of regenerating axon bundles in peripheral nerves Journal of Neural Engineering 2013 10 066018 24280623
  5. [46]Baldwin JF Washabaugh EP Moon JD Poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) on decellular scaffolding interrupts grafted muscle revascularization Neural Engineering (NER), 2013 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on 2013 1461 1464
  6. [49]Larson JV Goretski SA Cockrum JW Urbanchek MG Cederna PS Langhals NB Electrode characterization for use in a Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface Neural Engineering (NER), 2013 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on 2013 629 632
  7. [52]McDonnall D Guillory KS Gossman MD Restoration of blink in facial paralysis patients using FES Neural Engineering, 2009., NER '09. 4th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on 2009 76 79
  8. [55]McDonnall D Askin R Smith C Guillory KS Verification and validation of an electrode array for a blink prosthesis for facial paralysis patients Neural Engineering (NER), 2013 6th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on 2013 1167 1170 This article highlights advanced electrode technology for facial reanimation.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Langhals, N. B., Urbanchek, M. G., Ray, A., & Brenner, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Plastic Surgery Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Langhals, Nicholas B.
  • Urbanchek, Melanie G.
Venue
Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery
Published
2014-08
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
291-299
ISSN
1068-9508 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073652127
Cited by
41
References
52
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head & Neck Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (T32DC005356, K08DC012535)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Facial Nerve Paralysis Treatment and Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Facial Rejuvenation and Surgery Techniques
Keywords
facial paralysis, facial reanimation, facial reinnervation, nerve regeneration, nerve injury, axon guidance, muscle transfer, electrical nerve stimulation, artificial tissue, nanotechnology, donor site morbidity
MeSH terms
Electric Stimulation Therapy, Facial Expression, Facial Paralysis, Humans, Nerve Regeneration, Neuronal Plasticity, Nerve Transfer, Tissue Engineering, Tissue Scaffolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review