Cited by 308Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health servicesPsychology and Mental Health

Mental Health Literacy, Attitudes to Help Seeking, and Perceived Need as Predictors of Mental Health Service Use: A Longitudinal Study

Open access
Bonabi, Herdis, Müller, Mario, Ajdacic-Gross, Vladeta, Eisele, Jochen, Rodgers, Stephanie, Seifritz, Erich, Rössler, Wulf, Rüsch, Nicolas·2016·Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease

Abstract

Many people with mental health problems do not use mental health care, resulting in poorer clinical and social outcomes. Reasons for low service use rates are still incompletely understood. In this longitudinal, population-based study, we investigated the influence of mental health literacy, attitudes toward mental health services, and perceived need for treatment at baseline on actual service use during a 6-month follow-up period, controlling for sociodemographic variables, symptom level, and a history of lifetime mental health service use. Positive attitudes to mental health care, higher mental health literacy, and more perceived need at baseline significantly predicted use of psychotherapy during the follow-up period. Greater perceived need for treatment and better literacy at baseline were predictive of taking psychiatric medication during the following 6 months. Our findings suggest that mental health literacy, attitudes to treatment, and perceived need may be targets for interventions to increase mental health service use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nmd.0000000000000488

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bonabi, H., Müller, M., Ajdacic-Gross, V., Eisele, J., Rodgers, S., Seifritz, E., Rössler, W., & Rüsch, N.
Affiliations
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Venue
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
Published
2016-04
Volume
204
Issue
4
Pages
321-324
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2335074027
Cited by
308
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 1
FWCI
27.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
mental health literacy, help-seeking attitudes, perceived need for treatment, mental health service utilization, help-seeking barriers, psychotherapy utilization, psychiatric medication use, help-seeking interventions
MeSH terms
Help-Seeking Behavior, Adult, Attitude to Health, Mental Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depressive Disorder, Female, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mental Health, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Psychotropic Drugs, Surveys and Questionnaires, Switzerland, Utilization Review, Health Literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review