Cited by 214Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychology and Mental HealthGender Roles and Identity Studies

Stigma as a barrier to recognizing personal mental illness and seeking help: a prospective study among untreated persons with mental illness

Open access
Schomerus, Georg, Stolzenburg, Susanne, Freitag, Simone, Speerforck, Sven, Janowitz, Deborah, Evans-Lacko, Sara, Muehlan, Holger, Schmidt, Silke·2019·European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience

Abstract

It is unclear to what extent failure to recognize symptoms as potential sign of a mental illness is impeding service use, and how stigmatizing attitudes interfere with this process. In a prospective study, we followed a community sample of 188 currently untreated persons with mental illness (predominantly depression) over 6 months. We examined how lack of knowledge, prejudice and discrimination impacted on self-identification as having a mental illness, perceived need, intention to seek help, and help-seeking, both with respect to primary care (visiting a general practitioner, GP) and specialist care (seeing a mental health professional, MHP). 67% sought professional help within 6 months. Fully saturated path models accounting for baseline depressive symptoms, previous treatment experience, age and gender showed that self-identification predicted need (beta 0.32, p < 0.001), and need predicted intention (GP: beta 0.45, p < 0.001; MHP: beta 0.38, p < 0.001). Intention predicted service use with a MHP after 6 months (beta 0.31, p < 0.01; GP: beta 0.17, p = 0.093). More knowledge was associated with more self-identification (beta 0.21, p < 0.01), while support for discrimination was associated with lower self-identification (beta - 0.14, p < 0.05). Blaming persons with mental illness for their problem was associated with lower perceived need (beta - 0.16, p < 0.05). Our models explained 37% of the variance of seeking help with a MHP, and 33% of help-seeking with a GP. Recognizing one's own mental illness and perceiving a need for help are impaired by lack of knowledge, prejudice, and discrimination. Self-identification is a relevant first step when seeking help for mental disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00406-018-0896-0

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Angermeyer MC, Matschinger H, Schomerus G (2017) [50th Anniversary of Psychiatric Attitude Research in Germany]. Psychiatr Prax. 44(7):377-392.
  2. Angermeyer MC, Heiß S, Kirschenhofer S, Ladinser E, Löffler W, Schulze B, Swiridoff M (2003) [The German Version of the Community-Attitudes-Toward-the-Mentally-Ill (CAMI) Inventory]. Psychiatrische Praxis 30 (04):202-206.
  3. Muthén LK, Muthén BO (1998-2017) Mplus User's Guide. Eighth Edition. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA 46. Statistical Office Germany (2015). https://www.destatis.de/DE/ZahlenFakten/GesellschaftStaat/BildungForschungKultur/Bildun gsstand/Tabellen/Bildungsabschluss.html Accessed 23.1.2017
  4. Tomczyk S, Schomerus G, Stolzenburg S, Muehlan H, Schmidt S (under review). An application of the theory of planned behaviour to help-seeking in adults with currently untreated mental health problems -a longitudinal study.
  5. Kivelitz L, Watzke B, Schulz H, Harter M, Melchior H (2015) [Health care barriers on the pathways of patients with anxiety and depressive disorders -a qualitative interview study]. Psychiatrische Praxis 42 (8):424-429.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schomerus, G., Stolzenburg, S., Freitag, S., Speerforck, S., Janowitz, D., Evans-Lacko, S., Muehlan, H., & Schmidt, S.
Affiliations
  • Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (DE)
  • Universität Greifswald (DE)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Corresponding author
Schomerus, Georg
Venue
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
Published
2018-04-20
Volume
269
Issue
4
Pages
469-479
ISSN
  • 0003-9373 (ISSN-L)
  • 0940-1334
  • 1433-8491
OpenAlex
W2802373219
Cited by
214
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
22.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SCHO 1337/4-1, SCHM 2683/4-1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
Keywords
mental health stigma, help-seeking, untreated mental illness, depression, perceived need for help, help-seeking intentions, prejudice and discrimination, mental health literacy, primary care, mental health professionals, blame attribution
MeSH terms
Adult, Depressive Disorder, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Social Stigma, General Practice, Diagnostic Self Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review