Cited by 168Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyCardiac Health and Mental HealthReligion and Society Interactions

Religion and Remission of Depression in Medical Inpatients With Heart Failure/Pulmonary Disease

Koenig, Harold G.·2007·Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease

Abstract

The impact of religious involvement on time to remission of depression was examined in older medical inpatients with heart failure and/or chronic pulmonary disease (CHF/CPD). Inpatients older than 50 years with CHF/CPD were systematically diagnosed with depressive disorder using a structured psychiatric interview. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine the effects of religious involvement on time to remission, controlling for covariates. Of 1000 depressed patients identified at baseline, follow-up data on depression course were obtained on 87%. Patients involved in group-related religious activities experienced a shorter time to remission. Although numerous religious measures were unrelated by themselves to depression outcome, the combination of frequent religious attendance, prayer, Bible study, and high intrinsic religiosity, predicted a 53% increase in speed of remission (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.20-1.94, p = 0.0005, n = 839) after controls. Patients highly religious by multiple indicators, particularly those involved in community religious activities, remit faster from depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nmd.0b013e31802f58e3

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 178 highest-rigor studies on R/S and depression, 119 (67%) reported inverse relationships and 13 (7%) found positive relationships with depression.

    “Of the 178 studies with the highest methodological rigor, 119 (67%) reported inverse relationships [124–135] and 13 (7%) found positive relationships with depression [136–148].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koenig, H. G.
Affiliations
Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Koenig, Harold G.
Venue
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
Published
2007-05
Volume
195
Issue
5
Pages
389-395
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W68520005
Cited by
168
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 18
FWCI
8.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh057662-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH 57662)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
Keywords
religious involvement, depression remission, heart failure, chronic lung disease, older medical inpatients, intrinsic religiosity, religious service attendance, prayer, Bible study, community religious activities, depressive disorders
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Age Factors, Aged, Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Failure, Hospitalization, Humans, Lung Diseases, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Religion, Religion and Medicine, Religion and Psychology, Severity of Illness Index, Social Support, Time Factors, Comorbidity, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review