Cited by 163Child Abuse and TraumaPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Self-Awareness, Affect Regulation, and Relatedness: Differential Sequels of Childhood Versus Adult Victimization Experiences

Briere, John, Rickards, Shannae·2007·Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease

Abstract

This study examined abuse and trauma exposure as it predicted identity problems, affect dysregulation, and relational disturbance in 620 individuals from the general population. Multivariate analyses indicated that maternal (but not paternal) emotional abuse was uniquely associated with elevations on all 7 scales of the Inventory of Altered Self-Capacities (IASC): Interpersonal Conflicts, Idealization-Disillusionment, Abandonment Concerns, Identity Impairment, Susceptibility to Influence, Affect Dysregulation, and Tension Reduction Activities. Low paternal (but not low maternal) emotional support was associated with Interpersonal Conflicts, Abandonment Concerns, and Tension Reduction Behaviors. Paternal emotional support did not significantly decrease the negative effects of maternal emotional abuse. Sexual abuse was predictive of all IASC scales except for Interpersonal Conflicts and Identity Impairment. Noninterpersonal traumas and adult traumas were typically unrelated to IASC scales. Childhood emotional and sexual maltreatment--perhaps especially maternal emotional abuse--may be critical factors in the development of disturbed self-capacities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nmd.0b013e31803044e2

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The association between exposure to sustained traumatic stressors and disturbances in affect, self-concept, and relational difficulties has been supported in the literature.

    “Indeed, the association between exposure to sustained traumatic stressors and disturbances in affect, self-concept, and relational difficulties has been supported in the literature (Briere & Rickards, 2007).”

    From Evidence for proposed ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD: a latent profile analysis (2013) · cites this paper as Briere & Rickards, 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Briere, J., & Rickards, S.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Briere, John
Venue
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
Published
2007-06
Volume
195
Issue
6
Pages
497-503
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048935913
Cited by
163
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 15
FWCI
7.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
childhood emotional abuse, child sexual abuse, trauma exposure, affect dysregulation, interpersonal conflict, parental emotional support, self-capacity, relatedness
MeSH terms
Affective Symptoms, Age Factors, Awareness, Child, Child Abuse, Child Abuse, Sexual, Family Relations, Father-Child Relations, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Mother-Child Relations, Personality Disorders, Personality Inventory, Self Concept, Social Adjustment, Stress, Psychological, Multivariate Analysis, Crime Victims

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review