Cited by 263Nursing education and managementStress and Burnout ResearchHealthcare Education and Workforce Issues

Authentic leadership, empowerment and burnout: a comparison in new graduates and experienced nurses: Authentic leadership and empowerment

Open access
LASCHINGER, HEATHER K. SPENCE, WONG, CAROL A., GRAU, ASHLEY L.·2013·Journal of Nursing Management

Abstract

AIM: To examine the effect of authentic leadership and structural empowerment on the emotional exhaustion and cynicism of new graduates and experienced acute-care nurses. BACKGROUND: Employee empowerment is a fundamental component of healthy work environments that promote nurse health and retention, and nursing leadership is key to creating these environments. METHOD: In a secondary analysis of data from two studies we compared the pattern of relationships among study variables in two Ontario groups: 342 new graduates with <2 years of experience and 273 nurses with more than 2 years of experience. RESULTS: A multi-group path analysis using Structural Equation Modelling indicated an acceptable fit of the final model (χ(2) = 17.52, df = 2, P < 0.001, CFI = 0.97, IFI = 0.97 and RMSEA = 0.11). Authentic leadership significantly and negatively influenced emotional exhaustion and cynicism through workplace empowerment in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The authentic behaviour of nursing leaders was important to nurses' perceptions of structurally empowering conditions in their work environments, regardless of experience level, and ultimately contributed to lower levels of emotional exhaustion and cynicism. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Leadership training for nurse managers may help develop the empowering work environments required in today's health-care organizations in order to attract and retain nurses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01375.x

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Empirical studies suggest that authentic leadership positively influences followers' work attitudes and performance.

    “Empirical studies suggest that authentic leadership positively influences followers ' work attitudes and performance (e.g., Banks et al., 2016; Laschinger et al., 2013; Leroy et al., 2012).”

    From The evolution of leadership: Past insights, present trends, and future directions (2025) · cites this paper as Laschinger et al., 2013

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [8]8. Carsten M.K., Crossley C.D. & Avolio B. (2008) Authentic Leadership and Follower Outcomes. Paper presented at 68th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management Conference.
  2. [18]18. Greco P., Laschinger H.K.S. & Wong C. (2006) Leader empow- ering behaviours, staff work empowerment and work engage- ment/burnout. Nursing Leadership 19 (4), 41-56.
  3. [31]31. Laschinger H.K.S., Finegan J., Shamian J. & Wilk P. (2001) Im- pact of structural and psychological empowerment on job strain in nursing work settings. Journal of Nursing Adminis- tration 31 (5), 260-272.
  4. [36]36. Laschinger H.K.S., Finegan J. & Wilk P. (2009b) The impact of unit leadership and empowerment on nursesÕ organizational commitment. Journal of Nursing Administration 39 (5), 228-235.
  5. [42]42. McCall M.W. & Lombardo M.M. (1983) What makes a top executive? Psychology Today 17 (2), 26-31.
  6. [45]45. Nooney J.G., Unruh L. & Yore M.M. (2010) Should I stay or should I go? Change and labour force separation among reg- istered nurses in the US Career Social Science and Medicine 70 (12), 1874-1881.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LASCHINGER, H. K. S., WONG, C. A., & GRAU, A. L.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Venue
Journal of Nursing Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-04-15
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
541-552
ISSN
0966-0429 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144549127
Cited by
263
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
34.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nursing Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Toronto
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Keywords
authentic leadership, workplace empowerment, burnout, emotional exhaustion, cynicism, new nurses, experienced nurses, nursing leadership, nurse retention, nurses' health, acute care nursing, leadership training
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Burnout, Professional, Clinical Competence, Female, Humans, Leadership, Male, Middle Aged, Nurse Administrators, Power, Psychological, Organizational Culture, Nursing Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review