Cited by 58Reproductive tract infections researchHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsCervical Cancer and HPV Research

A randomized controlled trial of partner notification methods for prevention of trichomoniasis in women.

Schwebke, Jane R., Desmond, Renee A.·2010·Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trichomoniasis is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes and increased risk for human immunodeficiency virus. Males are usually asymptomatic, and thus there is heavy reliance on partner notification for identifying infected male partners. The usual approach is partner referral but it is estimated that only a minority of men seek care. We conducted a randomized trial to compare the effectiveness of 3 methods of partner notification. METHODS: Women were randomized to self-referral of partners (PR), partner-delivered therapy (PDPT), or public health disease intervention (DIS) locating partners and delivering medication in the field, if needed. Test-of-cure visits were conducted at 5 to 9 days after enrollment. Repeat infections at 1 and 3 months of follow-up were the measure of effectiveness. RESULTS: A total of 484 women were randomized. Initial cure rates were 95.3%. At the 1- and 3-month follow-up visits, there was no significant difference in repeat infection rates when PDPT or DIS were compared to the reference of PR. However, when PDPT was compared to DIS or PR/DIS combined, at 1 month the PDPT group had a lower repeat infection rate (5.8 vs. 15% and 5.8 vs. 12.5%, respectively). Of these, 80% of women randomized to PDPT reported delivering medication and 89% thought it likely that partners took the medication. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: PDPT for trichomoniasis was well accepted and safe in this study. Rates of repeat infection in women in this intervention were lower than those in the DIS arm and DIS/PR arm combined although when compared directly to PR there was no significant difference.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/olq.0b013e3181dd1691

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing data indicate that EPT might have a role in partner management for trichomoniasis; however, no partner management intervention has been reported to be more effective than any other in reducing trichomoniasis reinfection rates.

    “Existing data indicate that EPT also might have a role in partner management for trichomoniasis; however, no partner management intervention has been reported to be more effective than any other in reducing trichomoniasis reinfection rates (129,130).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [130]

  • Expedited partner therapy probably reduced reinfection in patients and increased the number of partners treated compared with simple patient referral.

    “When compared with simple patient referral, EPT probably reduced reinfection in patients and increased the number of partners treated, with four of the five trials showing a moderate difference favouring EPT (90, 95, 103, 108), while a fifth trial indicated no difference between groups, although the evidence was of low certainty (99).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schwebke, J. R., & Desmond, R. A.
Affiliations
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
Schwebke, Jane R.
Venue
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Published
2010-06
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
392-396
ISSN
0148-5717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985471092
Cited by
57
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI050718)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Keywords
trichomoniasis, partner notification, recurrent infections, women, sexually transmitted infections, medication adherence, cure rate
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Antiprotozoal Agents, Female, Humans, Male, Preventive Health Services, Referral and Consultation, Sexual Partners, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Trichomonas Infections, Trichomonas vaginalis, Contact Tracing, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review