Cited by 470Reproductive tract infections researchHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsCervical Cancer and HPV Research

Effect of expedited treatment of sex partners on recurrent or persistent gonorrhea or chlamydial infection.

Open access
Golden, Matthew R., Whittington, William L.H., Handsfield, H. Hunter, Hughes, James P., Stamm, Walter E., Hogben, Matthew, Clark, Agnes, Malinski, Cheryl +3 more·2005·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many sex partners of persons with gonorrhea or chlamydial infections are not treated, which leads to frequent reinfections and further transmission. METHODS: We randomly assigned women and heterosexual men with gonorrhea or chlamydial infection to have their partners receive expedited treatment or standard referral. Patients in the expedited-treatment group were offered medication to give to their sex partners, or if they preferred, study staff members contacted partners and provided them with medication without a clinical examination. Patients assigned to standard partner referral were advised to refer their partners for treatment and were offered assistance notifying partners. The primary outcome was persistent or recurrent gonorrhea or chlamydial infection in patients 3 to 19 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: Persistent or recurrent gonorrhea or chlamydial infection occurred in 121 of 931 patients (13 percent) assigned to standard partner referral and 92 of 929 (10 percent) assigned to expedited treatment of sexual partners (relative risk, 0.76; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.59 to 0.98). Expedited treatment was more effective than standard referral of partners in reducing persistent or recurrent infection among patients with gonorrhea (3 percent vs. 11 percent, P=0.01) than in those with chlamydial infection (11 percent vs. 13 percent, P=0.17) (P=0.05 for the comparison of treatment effects) and remained independently associated with a reduced risk of persistent or recurrent infection after adjustment for other predictors of infection at follow-up (relative risk, 0.75; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.57 to 0.97). Patients assigned to expedited treatment of sexual partners were significantly more likely than those assigned to standard referral of partners to report that all of their partners were treated and significantly less likely to report having sex with an untreated partner. CONCLUSIONS: Expedited treatment of sex partners reduces the rates of persistent or recurrent gonorrhea or chlamydial infection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa041681

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All three U.S. trials reported that more partners were treated when patients were offered EPT.

    “All three trials reported that more partners were treated when patients were offered EPT.”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [125]

    In the enrollment and study population section (page not specified), this trial reports that patients offered expedited partner treatment were more likely to say all their partners were very likely to have been treated or tested negative. That supports the direction of the claim for this trial, but the measure includes negative tests rather than treatment alone, and this paper does not establish what all three trials reported. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Two U.S. trials reported statistically significant decreases in the rate of reinfection, and one observed a lower risk for persistent or recurrent infection that was statistically nonsignificant.

    “Two reported statistically significant decreases in the rate of reinfection, and one observed a lower risk for persistent or recurrent infection that was statistically nonsignificant.”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [125]

    Table 3 reports a statistically significant reduction in persistent or recurrent gonorrhea or chlamydial infection in this trial (relative risk 0.76, 95% CI 0.59–0.98). The introduction (section 677) also describes an earlier trial with a nonsignificant reduction, but the passages found do not establish the claimed second statistically significant trial. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Across EPT trials, reductions in chlamydia prevalence at follow-up were approximately 20%, and reductions in gonorrhea were approximately 50% at follow-up.

    “However, across trials, reductions in chlamydia prevalence at follow-up were approximately 20%, and reductions in gonorrhea were approximately 50% at follow-up.”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [125]

    The “gonorrhea and chlamydial infection at follow-up” section reports reductions with expedited partner treatment, but this trial’s figures are 15% for chlamydia and 73% for gonorrhea, not approximately 20% and 50%. The cited passage reports this trial’s results, not an estimate across trials. Page numbers are not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Evidence supporting EPT is based on three U.S. clinical trials involving heterosexual men and women with chlamydia or gonorrhea.

    “Evidence supporting EPT is based on three U.S. clinical trials involving heterosexual men and women with chlamydia or gonorrhea (125–127).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [125]

  • U.S. trials and a meta-analysis of EPT revealed that the magnitude of reduction in reinfection of index patients, compared with patient referral, differed according to the STI and the sex of the index patient.

    “U.S. trials and a meta-analysis of EPT revealed that the magnitude of reduction in reinfection of index patients, compared with patient referral, differed according to the STI and the sex of the index patient (110,125–127).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [125]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. McCormack WM, Dalu ZA, Martin DH, et al. Double-blind comparison of trovaflox- acin and doxycycline in the treatment of un- complicated Chlamydial urethritis and cer- vicitis. Sex Transm Dis 1999;26:531-6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Golden, M. R., Whittington, W. L. H., Handsfield, H. H., Hughes, J. P., Stamm, W. E., Hogben, M., Clark, A., Malinski, C., Helmers, J. R. L., Thomas, K. K., & Holmes, K. K.
Affiliations
  • Public Health – Seattle & King County (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2005-02-17
Volume
352
Issue
7
Pages
676-685
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2128708588
Cited by
470
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 35
FWCI
24.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Abbott Laboratories
  • University of Washington
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (K23AI001846, K23-AI01846, AI31448)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Keywords
gonorrhea, chlamydia, partner notification, expedited partner therapy, recurrent infections, persistent infection, sexually transmitted infections, partner treatment, men who have sex with men, women, reinfection prevention
MeSH terms
Adult, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Chlamydia Infections, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gonorrhea, Humans, Male, Patient Compliance, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Sexual Partners, Multivariate Analysis, Contact Tracing, Azithromycin, Heterosexuality, Cefixime

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review