Cited by 63Personality Traits and PsychologyCardiac Health and Mental HealthHealth disparities and outcomes

Neuroticism and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality: Socioeconomic Status Modifies the Risk in Women (UK Health and Lifestyle Survey)

Open access
Hagger-Johnson, Gareth, Roberts, Beverly, Boniface, David, Sabia, Séverine, Batty, G. David, Elbaz, Alexis, Singh-Manoux, Archana, Deary, Ian J.·2012·Psychosomatic Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The association between personality traits and mortality might differ as a function of socioeconomic status (SES). Our aim was to evaluate the all-cause, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and cancer mortality risk associated with neuroticism or extraversion and their interactions with SES in a representative sample of the UK adult population. METHODS: A total of 5450 participants (2505 men) from the Health and Lifestyle Survey completed the Eysenck Personality Inventory at baseline and were monitored for vital status over 25 years. SES was defined as a latent variable comprising occupational social class, educational attainment, and income. RESULTS: A significant neuroticism-by-SES-by-sex interaction (p = .04) for CVD mortality revealed a neuroticism-by-SES interaction specific to women. Compared to women with average SES, those with both high neuroticism and low SES were at an increased risk for CVD mortality (hazard ratio = 2.02, 95% confidence interval = 1.45-2.80), whereas those with high neuroticism and high SES combined were at a decreased risk for CVD mortality (hazard ratio = 0.61, 95% confidence interval = 0.38-0.97, p for interaction = 0.003). The interaction term was not explained by health behaviors (10% attenuation) and physiological variables (11% attenuation). This interaction was not observed for all-cause and cancer mortality risks or among men for CVD mortality. CONCLUSIONS: High neuroticism is a risk factor for cardiovascular mortality in women with low SES, whereas in women with higher SES, it is protective. Further research is needed to replicate this finding and identify the mechanisms behind the modifying effect of SES on neuroticism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/psy.0b013e31825c85ca

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hagger-Johnson, G., Roberts, B., Boniface, D., Sabia, S., Batty, G. D., Elbaz, A., Singh-Manoux, A., & Deary, I. J.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Venue
Psychosomatic Medicine
Published
2012-07
Volume
74
Issue
6
Pages
596-603
ISSN
0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013904305
Cited by
63
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4
FWCI
3.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Psychosomatic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG034454)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
neuroticism, cardiovascular mortality, socioeconomic status, personality traits, extraversion, sex differences, cancer mortality, all-cause mortality, occupational class, educational attainment, income, health behavior, physiological parameters
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cause of Death, Female, United Kingdom, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neurotic Disorders, Personality Inventory, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Social Class, Women, Health Behavior, Proportional Hazards Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review