Cited by 141Personality Traits and PsychologyDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementCardiac Health and Mental Health

Patient personality and mortality: A 4-year prospective examination of chronic renal insufficiency.

Christensen, Alan J., Ehlers, Shawna L., Wiebe, John S., Moran, Patricia J., Raichle, Katherine, Ferneyhough, Karin, Lawton, William J.·2002·Health Psychology

Abstract

The present study examined the role of personality as a predictor of mortality among patients with chronic renal insufficiency. A prospective evaluation of the influence of personality on patient survival was conducted over an average 49-month period. Cox regression was used to evaluate the effects of 5 dimensions of personality in a sample of 174 patients (100 male and 74 female). At follow-up, 49 patients had died. Significant demographic and clinical predictors of survival included age, diabetic status, and hemoglobin level. After these predictors were controlled for, 2 personality traits, conscientiousness and neuroticism, predicted patient mortality. Patients with high neuroticism scores had a 37.5% higher estimated mortality rate. Patients with low conscientiousness scores had a 36.4% increased mortality rate.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-6133.21.4.315

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Christensen, A. J., Ehlers, S. L., Wiebe, J. S., Moran, P. J., Raichle, K., Ferneyhough, K., & Lawton, W. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • The University of Texas at El Paso (US)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2002
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
315-320
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W2093211592
Cited by
141
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK49129)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
personality, mortality, chronic renal insufficiency, conscientiousness, neuroticism, survival prediction, personality traits, hemoglobin, diabetes mellitus
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Sick Role, Survival Rate, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review