Cited by 41Digital Mental Health InterventionsCancer survivorship and careTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Online interventions aimed at reducing psychological distress in cancer patients: evidence update and suggestions for future directions

Open access
Willems, Roy A., Bolman, Catherine A.W., Lechner, Lilian, Mesters, Ilse, Gunn, Kate M., Skrabal Ross, Xiomara, Olver, Ian·2020·Current Opinion in Supportive & Palliative Care

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: A great proportion of people affected by cancer experience psychological distress. To reduce pressure on limited health-management resources available, evidence-based eHealth or online interventions can fill an important gap by making psychosocial care more easily accessible. However, evidence of their effectiveness is mixed. This present review provides an update on the effectiveness of online interventions in reducing psychological distress in patients with cancer by including studies published from January 2018 to September 2019. RECENT FINDINGS: Thirty-three publications describing online interventions were included in the review, including web-based, blended care, telehealth, mHealth, and other online interventions. There was great heterogeneity across studies. The evidence of online interventions' effectiveness in reducing distress was mixed; there was partial support for reduction in psychological distress and depression, but limited evidence for reducing anxiety. Some important limitations should be taken into account when interpreting the results. SUMMARY: Online interventions for people affected by cancer, in general, are well received and seem to be a necessary component of comprehensive cancer care. However, these interventions should be more rigorously tested to provide more conclusive evidence about their effectiveness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/spc.0000000000000483

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Willems, R. A., Bolman, C. A. W., Lechner, L., Mesters, I., Gunn, K. M., Skrabal Ross, X., & Olver, I.
Affiliations
  • Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • University of South Australia (AU)
  • Cancer Research Institute
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
Corresponding author
Willems, Roy A.
Venue
Current Opinion in Supportive & Palliative Care
Published
2020-03
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
27-39
ISSN
  • 1751-4258 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-4266
OpenAlex
W2997251289
Cited by
41
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
online intervention, e-health, psychological distress, cancer patients, depression, anxiety, telemedicine, mobile health, blended care, psychosocial care, comprehensive cancer care
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Self-Management, Internet-Based Intervention, Age Factors, Anxiety, Communication, Depression, Family, Humans, Neoplasms, Patient Education as Topic, Psychotherapy, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers, Telemedicine, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review