Cited by 74Digital Mental Health InterventionsCancer survivorship and careTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Web-Delivered cognitive behavioral therapy for distressed cancer patients: randomized controlled trial

Open access
Chambers, Suzanne K, Ritterband, Lee M, Thorndike, Frances, Nielsen, Lisa, Aitken, Joanne F, Clutton, Samantha, Scuffham, Paul A, Youl, Philippa +3 more·2018·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Web-based interventions present a potentially cost-effective approach to supporting self-management for cancer patients; however, further evidence for acceptability and effectiveness is needed. OBJECTIVE: The goal of our research was to assess the effectiveness of an individualized Web-based cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) intervention on improving psychological and quality of life outcomes in cancer patients with elevated psychological distress. METHODS: A total of 163 distressed cancer patients (111 female, 68.1%) were recruited through the Queensland Cancer Registry and the Cancer Council Queensland Cancer Helpline and randomly assigned to either a Web-based tailored CBT intervention (CancerCope) (79/163) or a static patient education website (84/163). At baseline and 8-week follow-up we assessed primary outcomes of psychological and cancer-specific distress and unmet psychological supportive care needs and secondary outcomes of positive adjustment and quality of life. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analyses showed no evidence of a statistically significant intervention effect on primary or secondary outcomes. However, per-protocol analyses found a greater decrease for the CancerCope group in psychological distress (P=.04), cancer-specific distress (P=.02), and unmet psychological care needs (P=.03) from baseline to 8 weeks compared with the patient education group. Younger patients were more likely to complete the CancerCope intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This online CBT intervention was associated with greater decreases in distress for those patients who more closely adhered to the program. Given the low costs and high accessibility of this intervention approach, even if only effective for subgroups of patients, the potential impact may be substantial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613001026718; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=364768&isReview=true (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6uPvpcovl).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.8850

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • E-mental health interventions enable patients with cancer to better cope with psychological distress.

    “E-mental health interventions try to overcome some of these barriers and the limitation of healthcare offers, enabling patients with cancer to better cope with psychological distress.”

    From Web-based mindfulness and skills-based distress reduction for patients with cancer: study protocol of the multicentre, randomised, controlled confirmatory intervention trial Reduct (2022) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Results (Effectiveness; page not provided) report reduced psychological and cancer-specific distress among patients who used at least three CancerCope modules, supporting a possible benefit. But the intention-to-treat analysis found no significant intervention effect, and the Discussion says the authors could not conclude that CancerCope was effective as a standalone intervention. The claim presents the benefit more generally than this trial supports. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • E-mental health interventions have proven to be feasible and effective in improving quality of life.

    “E-mental health interventions have proven to be feasible and effective in improving quality of life.”

    From Web-based mindfulness and skills-based distress reduction for patients with cancer: study protocol of the multicentre, randomised, controlled confirmatory intervention trial Reduct (2022) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Results > Effectiveness section reports that patients generally found the CancerCope web program easy to use and that technical problems were infrequent, supporting feasibility in this cancer-patient trial. But quality of life was a measured secondary outcome, and the intention-to-treat analysis found no statistically significant intervention effect on any secondary outcome. The paper therefore does not establish that the intervention improved quality of life, let alone that e-mental health interventions generally have proven to do so. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Patients with cancer who used e-mental health interventions experienced significantly reduced levels of distress, depression, pain, fatigue and anxiety.

    “Patients with cancer who used e-mental health interventions experienced significantly reduced levels of distress, depression, pain, fatigue and anxiety.”

    From Web-based mindfulness and skills-based distress reduction for patients with cancer: study protocol of the multicentre, randomised, controlled confirmatory intervention trial Reduct (2022) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Results > Effectiveness section reports significantly greater decreases in psychological and cancer-specific distress only among CancerCope participants who accessed at least three program cores. It reports no statistically significant intervention effect in the intention-to-treat analysis and does not establish significant reductions in depression, pain, fatigue, or anxiety. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recent scientific findings suggest significant effects on well-being in terms of distress, depression and anxiety, especially for web-based interventions that included CBT, ACT and MBSR.

    “Recent scientific findings extend their effectiveness by suggesting significant effects on well-being in terms of distress, depression and anxiety,11 16–20 especially for web-based interventions that included cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) techniques, acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR).”

    From Web-based mindfulness and skills-based distress reduction for patients with cancer: study protocol of the multicentre, randomised, controlled confirmatory intervention trial Reduct (2022) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Results > Effectiveness section reports significant reductions in psychological and cancer-specific distress only in a per-protocol subgroup using the web-based CBT intervention; the intention-to-treat analysis found no significant effect. The paper does not establish significant effects on depression or anxiety separately, or evaluate ACT or MBSR. Our copy provides no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous research shows that web-based interventions to reduce psychological distress in patients with cancer including CBT, MBSR or ACT have been proven to be effective.

    “Previous research shows that web-based interventions to reduce psychological distress in patients with cancer including CBT, MBSR or ACT have been proven to be effective.”

    From Web-based mindfulness and skills-based distress reduction for patients with cancer: study protocol of the multicentre, randomised, controlled confirmatory intervention trial Reduct (2022) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Results > Effectiveness section reports reduced distress for patients who used at least three modules of the web-based CBT program, but no statistically significant effect in the intention-to-treat analysis. The paper does not establish that web-based MBSR or ACT interventions are effective, so the claim is broader and more certain than its findings. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [28]Cohen J Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd Edition 1988 Hillsdale Lawrence Earlbaum Associates

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chambers, S. K., Ritterband, L. M., Thorndike, F., Nielsen, L., Aitken, J. F., Clutton, S., Scuffham, P. A., Youl, P., Morris, B., Baade, P. D., & Dunn, J.
Affiliations
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Cancer Council Queensland (AU)
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • Menzies School of Health Research (AU)
Corresponding author
Chambers, Suzanne K
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2018-01-31
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
e42
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2787147185
Cited by
74
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5
FWCI
9.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1056756, 1054038)
  • Cancer Council Queensland
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, cancer patients, psychological distress, cancer-specific distress, quality of life, patient education websites, intervention adherence, self-management
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review