Cited by 86Sleep and related disordersFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesSleep and Wakefulness Research

Affect and Arousal in Insomnia: Through a Lens of Neuroimaging Studies

Open access
Schiel, Julian E., Holub, Florian, Petri, Roxana, Leerssen, Jeanne, Tamm, Sandra, Tahmasian, Masoud, Riemann, Dieter, Spiegelhalder, Kai·2020·Current Psychiatry Reports

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Previous research has struggled with identifying clear-cut, objective counterparts to subjective distress in insomnia. Approaching this discrepancy with a focus on hyperarousal and dysfunctional affective processes, studies examining brain structures and neural networks involved in affect and arousal are reviewed and conclusions for an updated understanding of insomnia are drawn. Recent Findings: Recent studies found that amygdala reactivity, morphometry and adaptation in insomnia are altered, indicating that processing of negative stimuli is intensified and more lasting. Also, patients with insomnia show aberrant connectivity in the default mode network (DMN) and the salience network (SN), which is associated with subjective sleep disturbances, hyperarousal, maladaptive emotion regulation and disturbed integration of emotional states. The limbic circuit is assumed to play a crucial role in enhanced recall of negative experiences. Summary: There is reason to consider insomnia as a disorder of affect and arousal. Dysregulation of the limbic circuit might perpetuate impaired connectivity in the DMN and the SN. However, the interplay between the networks is yet to be researched.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11920-020-01173-0

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with insomnia show moderately increased cortisol levels, with the greatest elevations in the evening and first half of the night.

    “Meta-analytic evidence confirms that individuals with insomnia show moderately increased cortisol levels, with the greatest elevations observed in the evening and first half of the night, precisely when sleep initiation should occur [23,24].”

    From Pre-Sleep Anxiety: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches in Clinical Practice. (2026) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Hyperarousal Theory section says increased arousal in patients with insomnia has been associated with increased cortisol secretion (page unavailable). It does not give a moderate effect size, identify the evening or first half of the night as the period of greatest elevation, or describe the cortisol finding as meta-analytic. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schiel, J. E., Holub, F., Petri, R., Leerssen, J., Tamm, S., Tahmasian, M., Riemann, D., & Spiegelhalder, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience (NL)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Shahid Beheshti University (IR)
Corresponding author
Schiel, Julian E.
Venue
Current Psychiatry Reports
Published
2020-07-13
Volume
22
Issue
9
Pages
44-44
ISSN
  • 1523-3812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-1645
OpenAlex
W3041749849
Cited by
86
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Psychiatry Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • KNAW research portal (Royal Academy of Art and Sciences (KNAW)) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Universitätsklinikum Freiburg
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
insomnia, hyperarousal, affect, amygdala reactivity, default mode network, salience network, limbic circuits, emotion regulation, artificial neural networks
MeSH terms
Arousal, Brain, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review