Cited by 94Ethics and bioethics in healthcarePalliative and Oncologic CareHealth, Medicine and Society

Treatment-resistant major depressive disorder and assisted dying

Open access
Schuklenk, Udo, Vathorst, Suzanne van de·2015·Journal of Medical Ethics

Abstract

Competent patients suffering from treatment-resistant depressive disorder should be treated no different in the context of assisted dying to other patients suffering from chronic conditions that render their lives permanently not worth living to them. Jurisdictions that are considering, or that have, decriminalised assisted dying are discriminating unfairly against patients suffering from treatment-resistant depression if they exclude such patients from the class of citizens entitled to receive assistance in dying.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/medethics-2014-102458

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decision-making competence in persons with mental disorders may be compromised by their illness and more difficult to assess.

    “decision-making competence may be compromised by their illness and more difficult to assess”

    From Assisted suicide in persons with mental disorders: a review of clinical-ethical arguments and recommendations (2024) · cites this paper as [7]

    In “TRD, COMPETENCE AND AUTHENTICITY” (page unavailable), the authors say depression influences patients’ views but that this does not establish impaired competence. They state that there is no evidence depression per se renders patients incompetent and argue that competence assessments should be treated no differently from those of other patients, contrary to the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The severity of suffering in persons with mental disorders may be more difficult to evaluate from an external perspective.

    “the severity of suffering may be more difficult to evaluate from an external perspective”

    From Assisted suicide in persons with mental disorders: a review of clinical-ethical arguments and recommendations (2024) · cites this paper as [7]

    The BACKGROUND TRD section (page not provided) says it is difficult to make the suffering of clinically depressed people intersubjective, supporting the point about evaluation from an external perspective. The claim extends that point to people with mental disorders generally, which the passage does not establish. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A multidisciplinary framework is widely recommended to mitigate bias and distribute evaluative responsibility.

    “A multidisciplinary framework is widely recommended to mitigate bias and distribute evaluative responsibility.”

    From Medical Assistance in Dying for the Sole Underlying Condition of Mental Disorder (MAiD MD-SUMC): an analysis and qualitative evidence synthesis (2026) · cites this paper as [59]

    The section “Depression and Assisted Dying in the Netherlands” describes assessment by three independent physicians, including two psychiatrists, to check competence and ensure treatment options are not overlooked. It does not say a multidisciplinary framework is widely recommended, or describe mitigating bias and distributing evaluative responsibility as its purposes. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Schuklenk and van de Vathorst's proposed framework offers a widely cited foundation for assessments of MAiD requests on the basis of mental disorders, emphasising patient competence, ability to assess prospects based on current scientific evidence, voluntary and informed decision-making, perception of quality of life as not worth sustaining with minimal or no likelihood of improvement, and一致性 in决策

    “Schuklenk and van de Vathorst’s proposed framework offers a widely cited foundation for such assessments, emphasising:”

    From Medical Assistance in Dying for the Sole Underlying Condition of Mental Disorder (MAiD MD-SUMC): an analysis and qualitative evidence synthesis (2026) · cites this paper as [59]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The wish to die in persons with mental disorders may be more variable over time.

    “the wish to die may be more variable over time”

    From Assisted suicide in persons with mental disorders: a review of clinical-ethical arguments and recommendations (2024) · cites this paper as [7]

    In ‘Depression and assisted dying in the Netherlands’ (page unavailable), the paper reports that some psychiatric patients’ requests were refused because their wish to die was judged more or less impulsive. But in ‘TRD, Competence and Authenticity’ (page unavailable), it argues that patients with treatment-resistant depression may continue to regard their lives as not worth living. The paper does not establish that the wish to die is generally more variable over time in people with mental disorders. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Schuklenk U, Van de Vathorst S. J Med Ethics 2015;41:577-583. doi:10.1136/medethics-2014-102458 Feature article on September 11, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://jme.bmj.com/ J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/medethics-2014-102458 on 2 May 2015. Downloaded from
  2. Schuklenk U, Van de Vathorst S. J Med Ethics 2015;41:577-583. doi:10.1136/medethics-2014-102458 Feature article on September 11, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://jme.bmj.com/ J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/medethics-2014-102458 on 2 May 2015. Downloaded from

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schuklenk, U., & Vathorst, S. V. D.
Affiliations
  • Department of Philosophy, Queens University, Ontario, Canada
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Journal of Medical Ethics
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2015-05-02
Volume
41
Issue
8
Pages
577-583
ISSN
  • 0306-6800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-4257
OpenAlex
W2128372426
Cited by
93
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, Medicine and Society
Keywords
treatment-resistant depression, major depressive disorder, assisted dying, assisted suicide, right to die
MeSH terms
Canada, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Euthanasia, Humans, Netherlands, Patient Advocacy, Physician's Role, Psychiatry, Mental Competency, Guidelines as Topic, Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review