Cited by 216Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsSex and Gender in Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sex differences in Alzheimer's disease

Laws, Keith R., Irvine, Karen, Gale, Tim M.·2018·Current Opinion in Psychiatry

Abstract

Purpose of review Women are more impacted by Alzheimer's disease than men - they are at significantly greater risk of developing Alzheimer's disease, and recent research shows that they also appear to suffer a greater cognitive deterioration than men at the same disease stage. The purpose of this article is to review recent studies on examining sex differences in cognitive function in Alzheimer's disease. Recent findings We searched electronically for articles, reviews and meta-analyses published between 1/2016 and 12/2017 and identified 298 articles on sex differences in cognition in Alzheimer's disease. The key themes to emerge were sex differences in cognitive function, risk factors, resilience, and cognitive reserve. Summary Evidence is steadily and increasingly accumulating to confirm the poorer cognitive outcome for women than men with Alzheimer's disease. Although small in size, the effects occur across a broad range of cognitive domains including visuospatial, verbal, episodic memory, and semantic memory - some of which typically reveal a sex-related processing advantage for healthy women. Explanations have been linked to a variety of factors including differences in cognitive reserve, resilience, as well as genetics (apolipoprotein ε4) and functional and structural brain changes. Sex-related differences in risk factors, resilience, cognitive reserve, and rates of deterioration have implications for clinical practice.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/yco.0000000000000401

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Podcasy, 2016, Considering sex and gender in Alzheimer disease and other dementias, Dialogues Clin Neurosci, 18, 437, 10.31887/DCNS.2016.18.4/cepperson · DOI
  2. Gao, 1998, The relationships between age, sex, and the incidence of dementia and Alzheimer disease: a meta-analysis, Arch Gen Psychiatry, 55, 809, 10.1001/archpsyc.55.9.809 · DOI
  3. Dye, 2012, Hormone replacement therapy and risk for neurodegenerative diseases, Int J Alzheimers Dis, 2012, 258454
  4. Malpetti, 2017, Gender differences in healthy aging and Alzheimer's Dementia: a 18 F-FDG-PET study of brain and cognitive reserve, Hum Brain Mapp, 38, 4212, 10.1002/hbm.23659 · DOI
  5. Altmann, 2014, Sex modifies the APOE-related risk of developing Alzheimer disease, Ann Neurol, 75, 563, 10.1002/ana.24135 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Au, 2016, Sex differences in the prevalence and incidence of mild cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis, Ageing Res Rev, 35, 176, 10.1016/j.arr.2016.09.005 · DOI
  7. Lin, 2015, Marked gender differences in progression of mild cognitive impairment over 8 years, Alzheimers Dement, 1, 103, 10.1016/j.trci.2015.07.001 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Kim, 2015, Gender differences in risk factors for transition from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease: a CREDOS study, Compr Psychiatry, 62, 114, 10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.07.002 · DOI
  9. Debette, 2010, The clinical importance of white matter hyperintensities on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis, BMJ, 341, c3666, 10.1136/bmj.c3666 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Crean, 2011, Apolipoprotein E ε4 prevalence in Alzheimer's disease patients varies across global populations: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis, Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord, 31, 20, 10.1159/000321984 · DOI · Paper page
  11. McDermott, 2016, Memory resilience in carriers of Alzheimer's genetic risk: predictors vary for female and male older adults, Alzheimers Dement, 12, 398, 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.06.752 · DOI
  12. Li, 2014, Sex differences in cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease, Front Neuroendocrinol, 35, 385, 10.1016/j.yfrne.2014.01.002 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Proust-Lima, 2008, Gender and education impact on brain aging: a general cognitive factor approach, Psychol Aging, 23, 608, 10.1037/a0012838 · DOI
  14. Read, 2006, Sex differences after all those years? Heritability of cognitive abilities in old age, J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 619, 137, 10.1093/geronb/61.3.P137 · DOI
  15. Irvine, 2012, Greater cognitive deterioration in women than men with Alzheimer's disease: a meta analysis, J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 34, 989, 10.1080/13803395.2012.712676 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Hyde, 2005, The gender similarities hypothesis, Am Psychol, 60, 581, 10.1037/0003-066X.60.6.581 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Gale, 2016, Greater memory impairment in dementing females than males relative to sex-matched healthy controls, J Clin Exp Neuropsychol, 38, 527, 10.1080/13803395.2015.1132298 · DOI
  18. Elosúa, 2017, Gender differences in verbal and visuospatial working memory tasks in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease, Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra, 7, 101, 10.1159/000466689 · DOI
  19. Stern, 1999, Rate of memory decline in AD is related to education and occupation cognitive reserve?, Neurology, 53, 1942, 10.1212/WNL.53.9.1942 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Pusswald, 2015, Gender-specific differences in cognitive profiles of patients with Alzheimer's disease: results of the prospective dementia registry Austria (PRODEM-Austria), J Alzheimers Dis, 46, 631, 10.3233/JAD-150188 · DOI
  21. Laws, 2004, Sex differences in lexical size across semantic categories, Pers Individ Diff, 36, 23, 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00048-5 · DOI
  22. Moreno-Martínez, 2008, The impact of dementia, age and sex on category fluency: greater deficits in women with Alzheimer's disease, Cortex, 44, 1256, 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.11.008 · DOI
  23. Sundermann, 2016, Female advantage in verbal memory Evidence of sex-specific cognitive reserve, Neurology, 87, 1916, 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003288 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 216

Metadata

Authors
Laws, K. R., Irvine, K., & Gale, T. M.
Affiliations
University of Hertfordshire (GB)
Corresponding author
Laws, Keith R.
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Published
2018-03
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
133-139
ISSN
0951-7367 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2954842119
Cited by
216
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 5
FWCI
15.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, sex differences, cognitive decline, cognitive reserve, resilience, APOE ε4, risk factors, episodic memory, semantic memory, visuospatial processing, women
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review