Cited by 891Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies

Sex modifies the APOE ‐related risk of developing Alzheimer disease

Open access
Altmann, Andre, Tian, Lu, Henderson, Victor W., Greicius, Michael D., Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Investigators·2014·Annals of Neurology

Abstract

Objective: The APOE4 allele is the strongest genetic risk factor for sporadic Alzheimer disease (AD). Case–control studies suggest the APOE4 link to AD is stronger in women. We examined the APOE4 ‐by‐sex interaction in conversion risk (from healthy aging to mild cognitive impairment (MCI)/AD or from MCI to AD) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker levels. Methods: Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to compute hazard ratios (HRs) for an APOE ‐by‐sex interaction on conversion in controls (n = 5,496) and MCI patients (n = 2,588). The interaction was also tested in CSF biomarker levels of 980 subjects from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Results: Among controls, male and female carriers were more likely to convert to MCI/AD, but the effect was stronger in women (HR = 1.81 for women; HR = 1.27 for men; interaction: p = 0.011). The interaction remained significant in a predefined subanalysis restricted to APOE3/3 and APOE3/4 genotypes. Among MCI patients, both male and female APOE4 carriers were more likely to convert to AD (HR = 2.16 for women; HR = 1.64 for men); the interaction was not significant ( p = 0.14). In the subanalysis restricted to APOE3/3 and APOE3/4 genotypes, the interaction was significant ( p = 0.02; HR = 2.17 for women; HR = 1.51 for men). The APOE4 ‐by‐sex interaction on biomarker levels was significant for MCI patients for total tau and the tau‐to‐Aβ ratio ( p = 0.009 and p = 0.02, respectively; more AD‐like in women). Interpretation: APOE4 confers greater AD risk in women. Biomarker results suggest that increased APOE ‐related risk in women may be associated with tau pathology. These findings have important clinical implications and suggest novel research approaches into AD pathogenesis. Ann Neurol 2014;75:563–573

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ana.24135

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sex differences in Aβ burden alone have not been reported in older adults.

    “Sex differences in Aβ burden alone have not been reported in older adults,11–13”

    From Sex Differences in the Association of Global Amyloid and Regional Tau Deposition Measured by Positron Emission Tomography in Clinically Normal Older Adults (2019) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Discussion reports similar beta-amyloid levels in men and women with MCI and a pronounced APOE4 effect on beta-amyloid in healthy older adults of both sexes. However, the Results (CSF Biomarkers; page not provided) report a nominal sex-by-APOE4 interaction for CSF Aβ in healthy controls that did not survive correction for multiple tests. These findings support the absence of a robust difference in this study, but not the broader assertion that sex differences in Aβ burden have never been reported in older adults. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Epidemiologic studies show sex differences in clinical risk are largely discernable within the context of APOE ε4, particularly between the ages of 65 to 75 years compared with APOE ε4 clinically normal male carriers.

    “Epidemiologic studies show sex differences in clinical risk are largely discernable within the context of APOE ε4,11,42,43 particularly between the ages of 65 to 75 years compared with APOE ε4 clinically normal male carriers.44”

    From Sex Differences in the Association of Global Amyloid and Regional Tau Deposition Measured by Positron Emission Tomography in Clinically Normal Older Adults (2019) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Results (Clinical Conversion Risks; page unavailable) report a stronger APOE ε4–associated risk of conversion in clinically normal older women than in men, supporting the sex-difference point. They do not identify ages 65–75 as a particularly pronounced interval, and their reported risk estimates compare carriers with non-carriers within each sex rather than directly comparing female carriers with male carriers. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Minimal, if any, sex differences have been found cross-sectionally in levels of global Aβ burden in clinically normal older adults.

    “Minimal,6 if any,11,12,36 sex differences have been found cross sectionally in levels of global Aβ burden in clinically normal older adults”

    From Sex Differences in the Association of Global Amyloid and Regional Tau Deposition Measured by Positron Emission Tomography in Clinically Normal Older Adults (2019) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Results (CSF Biomarkers; page unavailable) found no statistically significant APOE4-by-sex interaction in CSF Aβ levels among healthy controls after correction for multiple testing, which supports the cited word “minimal.” The paper measured CSF Aβ and tested an APOE4-by-sex interaction; it did not establish minimal sex differences in global Aβ burden. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The increased risk of Alzheimer's disease associated with APOE E4 is associated with increased pTau.

    “Indeed, the increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease associated with the E4 allele of the APOE gene is especially pronounced in women and is associated with increased pTau141.”

    From Stress weakens prefrontal networks: molecular insults to higher cognition (2015) · cites this paper as [141]

    The Discussion reports an APOE4 main effect on CSF p-tau in healthy older controls, supporting an association between APOE4 and p-tau. But the Results (CSF Biomarkers) report that the higher p-tau pattern in female APOE4 carriers with mild cognitive impairment was only nominally significant and did not survive correction for multiple comparisons. The paper therefore does not establish the claim’s unqualified link between increased AD risk and increased p-tau. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Female sex is a risk factor for Alzheimer's degeneration.

    “Although the largest risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease is advanced age, TBI is also an established risk factor140, and new evidence suggests that psychological distress43 and female sex141 are also risk factors for Alzheimer’s degeneration.”

    From Stress weakens prefrontal networks: molecular insults to higher cognition (2015) · cites this paper as [141]

    The Abstract Results and Interpretation report that APOE4-related risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease is greater in women, with more AD-like tau biomarkers among female APOE4 carriers with mild cognitive impairment. The paper studies a sex-by-APOE4 interaction; it does not establish female sex as a general risk factor independent of APOE4. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Altmann, A., Tian, L., Henderson, V. W., Greicius, M. D., & Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Investigators
Affiliations
  • Stanford Center for Memory Disorders Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences Stanford University Stanford CA
  • Department of Health Research and Policy Stanford University Stanford CA
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Greicius, Michael D.
Venue
Annals of Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-04
Volume
75
Issue
4
Pages
563-573
ISSN
  • 0364-5134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8249
OpenAlex
W2159285109
Cited by
891
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 97 · 2025: 109 · 2024: 98 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 76 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 1
FWCI
31.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u01ag024904-10)
  • National Institute on Aging (U01-AG-024904, U01AG016976, P50AG005142, U19AG024904)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS073498, NS073498)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, APOE ε4, sex differences, genetic risk, mild cognitive impairment, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers, tau protein, amyloid-beta
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Genetic Testing, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Proportional Hazards Models, Case-Control Studies, Databases, Factual, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review