Cited by 426Sleep and related disordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

A new scale for measuring insomnia: the Bergen Insomnia Scale.

Pallesen, Stäle, Bjorvatn, Bjørn, Nordhus, Inger Hilde, Sivertsen, Børge, Hjørnevik, Mari, Morin, Charles M.·2008·Perceptual and Motor Skills

Abstract

A new scale for the measurement of insomnia, the Bergen Insomnia Scale, was constructed on the basis of current formal and clinical diagnostic criteria for insomnia. There are six items, of which the first three pertain to sleep onset, maintenance, and early morning wakening insomnia, respectively. The last three items refer to not feeling adequately rested, experiencing daytime impairment, and being dissatisfied with current sleep. This scale was validated in three samples, 320 students, 2645 community persons, and 225 patients. Cronbach alphas in the three samples were .79, .87, and .80, respectively. The 2-wk. test-retest reliability for students was .77. In the student and the patient samples, a two-factor solution was found, nocturnal symptoms and daytime symptoms, but in the community sample, a one-factor solution was found. The Bergen Insomnia Scale discriminated well between the patient sample and the other two. In all three, values of convergent and discriminative validity in relation to other self-report measures were good, as well as in relation to polysomnographic data for patients. It is concluded that the Bergen Insomnia Scale has good psychometric properties. It is one of very few insomnia scales which provide normative data for comparisons and which has been validated against subjective as well as polysomnographic data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2466/pms.107.3.691-706

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pallesen, S., Bjorvatn, B., Nordhus, I. H., Sivertsen, B., Hjørnevik, M., & Morin, C. M.
Affiliations
  • Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Norwegian Competence Center for Sleep Disorders
  • University of Bergen (NO)
  • Université Laval (CA)
Venue
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Published
2008-12
Volume
107
Issue
3
Pages
691-706
ISSN
  • 0031-5125 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-688X
OpenAlex
W2084471229
Cited by
426
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Perceptual and Motor Skills (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
insomnia, sleep onset insomnia, sleep maintenance insomnia, daytime dysfunction, self-report scale, psychometric validation, reference values, polysomnography
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Disorders of Excessive Somnolence, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Registries, Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Polysomnography, Nocturnal Myoclonus Syndrome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review