Cited by 250Soil and Environmental StudiesGeological formations and processesGeology and Environmental Impact Studies

Humans as major geological and geomorphological agents in the Anthropocene: the significance of artificial ground in Great Britain

Open access
Price, Simon J., Ford, Jonathan R., Cooper, Anthony H., Neal, Catherine·2011·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences

Abstract

Since the first prehistoric people started to dig for stone to make implements, rather than pick up loose material, humans have modified the landscape through excavation of rock and soil, generation of waste and creation of artificial ground. In Great Britain over the past 200 years, people have excavated, moved and built up the equivalent of at least six times the volume of Ben Nevis. It is estimated that the worldwide deliberate annual shift of sediment by human activity is 57,000 Mt (million tonnes) and exceeds that of transport by rivers to the oceans (22,000 Mt) almost by a factor of three. Humans sculpt and transform the landscape through the physical modification of the shape and properties of the ground. As such, humans are geological and geomorphological agents and the dominant factor in landscape evolution through settlement and widespread industrialization and urbanization. The most significant impact of this has been since the onset of the Industrial Revolution in the eighteenth century, coincident with increased release of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere. The anthropogenic sedimentological record, therefore, provides a marker on which to characterize the Anthropocene.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsta.2010.0296

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Burke, H. F., Price, S. J., Crofts, R. G., Thorpe, S. & Terrington, R. L. 2009 The 3D representation of human impacts on the urban landscape, NW England. In 7th International Conference on Geomorphology. Melbourne, Australia.
  2. CrossRail. 2010 Crossrail will move five million tonnes of earth via river, vol. 2010.
  3. Environment Agency. 2005 Hazardous Waste. Interpretation of the definition and classification of hazardous waste. Second Edition, Version 2.2, vol. Appendix 1.
  4. R. C. Chiverrell, A. J. Plater & G. S. P. Thomas), pp. 206-216. London: Quaternary Research Association.
  5. Mulder, E. F. J. d. 1996 Urban Geoscience. In Urban Geoscience (ed. G. J. H. McCall, E. F. J. d. Mulder & B. R. Marker), pp. 1-11. Rotterdam: A A Balkema/Rotterdam/Brookfield. NCB. 1975 Subsidence Engineers' Handbook: National Coal Board Mining Department.
  6. Parys Underground Group. 2010 History of Parys and Mona copper mines, vol. 2010.
  7. Pimental, D. & Skidmore, E. L. 1999 Rates of soils erosion. Letters. Science 286, 1477.
  8. Roberts, N. 1998 The Holocene. Oxford: Blackwell.
  9. M. S. Rosenbaum & A. K. turner), pp. 3-6. Dusseldorf: Springer-Verlag.
  10. The Motorway Archive. 2010, vol. 2010.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Price, S. J., Ford, J. R., Cooper, A. H., & Neal, C.
Affiliations
  • British Geological Survey, Kingsley Dunham Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK
  • British Geological Survey (GB)
  • Department of Archaeology, University of York, The King’s Manor, York YO1 7EP, UK
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2011-03-13
Volume
369
Issue
1938
Pages
1056-1084
ISSN
  • 1364-503X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2962
OpenAlex
W2158712357
Cited by
250
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
23.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Leicester
  • British Geological Survey
  • Natural Environment Research Council (bgs05008)
  • Norges Geologiske Undersøkelse
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil and Environmental Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Geological formations and processes
  • Social Sciences › Law › Geology and Environmental Impact Studies
Keywords
Anthropocene, artificial ground, human impact on landscape, sediment transport, landscape evolution, Industrial Revolution, urbanization, industrialization, Great Britain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review