Cited by 637Ethics and Social Impacts of AIFlooding and Environmental ImpactDigitalization, Law, and Regulation

What Is Data Ethics?

Open access
Floridi, Luciano, Taddeo, Mariarosaria·2016·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Abstract

This theme issue has the founding ambition of landscaping data ethics as a new branch of ethics that studies and evaluates moral problems related to data (including generation, recording, curation, processing, dissemination, sharing and use), algorithms (including artificial intelligence, artificial agents, machine learning and robots) and corresponding practices (including responsible innovation, programming, hacking and professional codes), in order to formulate and support morally good solutions (e.g. right conducts or right values). Data ethics builds on the foundation provided by computer and information ethics but, at the same time, it refines the approach endorsed so far in this research field, by shifting the level of abstraction of ethical enquiries, from being information-centric to being data-centric. This shift brings into focus the different moral dimensions of all kinds of data, even data that never translate directly into information but can be used to support actions or generate behaviours, for example. It highlights the need for ethical analyses to concentrate on the content and nature of computational operations—the interactions among hardware, software and data—rather than on the variety of digital technologies that enable them. And it emphasizes the complexity of the ethical challenges posed by data science. Because of such complexity, data ethics should be developed from the start as a macroethics, that is, as an overall framework that avoids narrow, ad hoc approaches and addresses the ethical impact and implications of data science and its applications within a consistent, holistic and inclusive framework. Only as a macroethics will data ethics provide solutions that can maximize the value of data science for our societies, for all of us and for our environments. This article is part of the themed issue ‘The ethical impact of data science’.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsta.2016.0360

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the digital age, human and machine agents are so closely intertwined in hybrid collectives that their relations determine their actions.

    “In order to fully understand the automation-augmentation paradox's societal implications, scholars could adopt a relational ontology which accepts that, in the digital age, human and machine agents are so closely intertwined in hybrid collectives that their relations determine their actions (Floridi & Taddeo, 2016).”

    From Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation–Augmentation Paradox (2021) · cites this paper as Floridi & Taddeo, 2016

    The Introduction says that the ethics of data, algorithms and practices are intertwined, and the Abstract discusses interactions among hardware, software and data. Neither passage addresses a relational ontology in which human and machine agents form hybrid collectives or their relations determine their actions. Searches for “hybrid collectives” and “relations determine their actions” found no supporting passage in our copy; page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The application of AI in healthcare raises significant concerns of fairness, responsibility, and human rights.

    “The application of AI in healthcare therefore raises significant concerns of fairness, responsibility, human rights (Floridi & Taddeo, 2016)”

    From Responsible AI for Digital Health: a Synthesis and a Research Agenda (2023) · cites this paper as Floridi & Taddeo, 2016

  • Deploying AI is coupled with significant ethical challenges.

    “Recent empirical articles highlight how deploying AI is coupled with significant ethical challenges (Floridi & Taddeo, 2016)”

    From Responsible AI for Digital Health: a Synthesis and a Research Agenda (2023) · cites this paper as Floridi & Taddeo, 2016

  • AI technologies pose unique ethical risks to fundamental rights that deserve special attention.

    “At the same time, these novel features mean that AI technologies pose unique ethical risks to fundamental rights that deserve special attention (Floridi and Taddeo 2016;Tsamados et al. 2021).”
  • Data in itself can be a source of manifold ethical problems.

    “At the same time, the nascent stream of data ethics tells us that data in itself can be a source of manifold ethical problems (Floridi and Taddeo 2016).”

    From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as Floridi and Taddeo 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [3]3. Miller K, Taddeo M (eds) 2017 The ethics of information technologies. Library of essays on the ethics of emerging technologies. New York, NY: Routledge.
  2. [23]23. Goodman B, Flaxman S. 2016 European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a 'right to explanation'. See http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.08813. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Floridi, L., & Taddeo, M.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Floridi, Luciano
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2016-12-28
Volume
374
Issue
2083
Pages
20160360
ISSN
  • 1364-503X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2962
OpenAlex
W2554467860
Cited by
637
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 159 · 2024: 107 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3
FWCI
72.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Alan Turing Institute (TU/B/000055, TU/B/000057)
  • Strong
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/N02334X/1, EP/N023013/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Flooding and Environmental Impact
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Keywords
data ethics, macroethics, data science ethics, information ethics, algorithms, artificial intelligence, responsible innovation
MeSH terms
Information Science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review