Cited by 483Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and Memory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The construction system of the brain

Open access
Hassabis, Demis, Maguire, Eleanor A.·2009·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

The ability to construct a hypothetical situation in one's imagination prior to it actually occurring may afford greater accuracy in predicting its eventual outcome. The recollection of past experiences is also considered to be a reconstructive process with memories recreated from their component parts. Construction, therefore, plays a critical role in allowing us to plan for the future and remember the past. Conceptually, construction can be broken down into a number of constituent processes although little is known about their neural correlates. Moreover, it has been suggested that some of these processes may be shared by a number of other cognitive functions including spatial navigation and imagination. Recently, novel paradigms have been developed that allow for the isolation and characterization of these underlying processes and their associated neuroanatomy. Here, we selectively review this fast-growing literature and consider some implications for remembering the past and predicting the future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2008.0296

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 76 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bartlett F.C. Remembering. 1932 Cambridge UK:Cambridge University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 483

Metadata

Authors
Hassabis, D., & Maguire, E. A.
Affiliations
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2009-05-12
Volume
364
Issue
1521
Pages
1263-1271
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2159210250
Cited by
483
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 25
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (084218)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
mental constructions, memory reconstruction, imagination, prediction, planning, neural correlates of memory, spatial navigation, cognitive neuroscience of memory, episodic memory
MeSH terms
Brain, Concept Formation, Humans, Imagination, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Memory, Models, Neurological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review