Cited by 281Action Observation and SynchronizationMotor Control and AdaptationChild and Animal Learning Development

Associative sequence learning: the role of experience in the development of imitation and the mirror system

Open access
Catmur, Caroline, Walsh, Vincent, Heyes, Cecilia·2009·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

A core requirement for imitation is a capacity to solve the correspondence problem ; to map observed onto executed actions, even when observation and execution yield sensory inputs in different modalities and coordinate frames. Until recently, it was assumed that the human capacity to solve the correspondence problem is innate. However, it is now becoming apparent that, as predicted by the associative sequence learning model, experience, and especially sensorimotor experience, plays a critical role in the development of imitation. We review evidence from studies of non-human animals, children and adults, focusing on research in cognitive neuroscience that uses training and naturally occurring variations in expertise to examine the role of experience in the formation of the mirror system. The relevance of this research depends on the widely held assumption that the mirror system plays a causal role in generating imitative behaviour. We also report original data supporting this assumption. These data show that theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation of the inferior frontal gyrus, a classical mirror system area, disrupts automatic imitation of finger movements. We discuss the implications of the evidence reviewed for the evolution, development and intentional control of imitation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2009.0048

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Correlated excitation of sensory and motor neurons encoding the same property of action occurs not only when humans are imitated, but also when we observe our own actions directly or using an optical mirror, observe others during synchronous activities, and as a consequence of acquired equivalence experience.

    “Correlated excitation of sensory and motor neurons encoding the same property of action occurs not only when humans are imitated, but also when we observe our own actions directly or using an optical mirror; observe others during the kind of synchronous activities involved in sports and dance training; and as a consequence of 'acquired equivalence' experience, for example, when the same sound (a w”

    From Mirror neurons: from origin to function (2014) · cites this paper as Catmur et al., 2009

  • TMS studies have demonstrated that stimulation of classical mirror areas can disrupt both intentional and automatic imitation of simple finger and hand actions.

    “TMS studies have demonstrated that stimulation of classical mirror areas can disrupt both intentional and automatic imitation of simple finger and hand actions”

    From Mirror neurons: from origin to function (2014) · cites this paper as Catmur et al., 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Catmur, C., Walsh, V., & Heyes, C.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Heyes, Cecilia
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2009-08-27
Volume
364
Issue
1528
Pages
2369-2380
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2126306116
Cited by
281
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 33
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (RES-538-28-1001)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
imitation, mirror system, correspondence problem, sensorimotor experience, inferior frontal gyrus, theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation, automatic imitation, finger movement, mirror neuron system
MeSH terms
Animals, Association Learning, Brain, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Motor Activity, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review