Cited by 74Action Observation and SynchronizationAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild and Animal Learning Development

Intact Automatic Imitation and Typical Spatial Compatibility in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Challenging the Broken Mirror Theory

Sowden, Sophie, Koehne, Svenja, Catmur, Caroline, Dziobek, Isabel, Bird, Geoffrey·2016·Autism Research

Abstract

A lack of imitative behavior is frequently described as a core feature of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), and is consistent with claims of mirror neuron system dysfunction in these individuals. Previous research has questioned this characterization of ASD however, arguing that when tests of automatic imitation are used—which do not require higher‐level cognitive processing—imitative behavior is intact or even enhanced in individuals with ASD. In Experiment 1, 60 adult individuals with ASD and a matched Control group completed an automatic imitation task in which they were required to perform an index or a middle finger lift while observing a hand making either the same, or the alternate, finger movement. Both groups demonstrated a significant imitation effect whereby actions were executed faster when preceded by observation of the same action, than when preceded by the alternate action. The magnitude of this “imitation effect” was statistically indistinguishable in the ASD and Control groups. Experiment 2 utilized an improved automatic imitation paradigm to demonstrate that, when automatic imitation effects are isolated from those due to spatial compatibility, increasing autism symptom severity is associated with an increased tendency to imitate. Notably, there was no association between autism symptom severity and spatial compatibility, demonstrating the specificity of the link between ASD symptoms and increased imitation. These results provide evidence against claims of a lack of imitative behavior in ASD, and challenge the “Broken Mirror Theory of Autism.” Autism Res 2016, 9: 292–300. © 2015 International Society for Autism Research, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/aur.1511

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sowden, S., Koehne, S., Catmur, C., Dziobek, I., & Bird, G.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • University of Surrey (GB)
Corresponding author
Sowden, Sophie
Venue
Autism Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-06-26
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
292-300
ISSN
  • 1939-3792 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-3806
OpenAlex
W1534550476
Cited by
74
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3
FWCI
12.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Autism Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, automatic imitation, mirror neuron system, imitation effect, spatial compatibility, autism severity, motor imitation
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adult, Female, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Space Perception, Mirror Neurons

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review