Cited by 75Action Observation and SynchronizationMotor Control and AdaptationFree Will and Agency

Acquisition of automatic imitation is sensitive to sensorimotor contingency.

Open access
Cook, Richard, Press, Clare, Dickinson, Anthony, Heyes, Cecilia·2010·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Abstract

The associative sequence learning model proposes that the development of the mirror system depends on the same mechanisms of associative learning that mediate Pavlovian and instrumental conditioning. To test this model, two experiments used the reduction of automatic imitation through incompatible sensorimotor training to assess whether mirror system plasticity is sensitive to contingency (i.e., the extent to which activation of one representation predicts activation of another). In Experiment 1, residual automatic imitation was measured following incompatible training in which the action stimulus was a perfect predictor of the response (contingent) or not at all predictive of the response (noncontingent). A contingency effect was observed: There was less automatic imitation indicative of more learning in the contingent group. Experiment 2 replicated this contingency effect and showed that, as predicted by associative learning theory, it can be abolished by signaling trials in which the response occurs in the absence of an action stimulus. These findings support the view that mirror system development depends on associative learning and indicate that this learning is not purely Hebbian. If this is correct, associative learning theory could be used to explain, predict, and intervene in mirror system development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0019256

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experimental data and modeling work indicate that the sensorimotor learning which changes MNs depends on contingency as well as contiguity.

    “experimental data and modeling work have indicated that the sensorimotor learning which changes MNs depends on contingency as well as contiguity”

    From Mirror neurons: from origin to function (2014) · cites this paper as Cook et al., 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cook, R., Press, C., Dickinson, A., & Heyes, C.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Published
2010
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
840-852
ISSN
  • 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1277
OpenAlex
W2035180286
Cited by
75
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 12
FWCI
11.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Economic and Social Research Council
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
Keywords
automatic imitation, sensorimotor contingencies, associative learning, classical conditioning, operant conditioning, Hebbian learning, motor learning
MeSH terms
Adult, Association Learning, Attention, Conditioning, Psychological, Cues, Discrimination Learning, Female, Gestures, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review