Cited by 3,197Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactAgricultural and Food Production Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050

Open access
Parfitt, Julian, Barthel, Mark, Macnaughton, Sarah·2010·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Food waste in the global food supply chain is reviewed in relation to the prospects for feeding a population of nine billion by 2050. Different definitions of food waste with respect to the complexities of food supply chains (FSCs)are discussed. An international literature review found a dearth of data on food waste and estimates varied widely; those for post-harvest losses of grain in developing countries might be overestimated. As much of the post-harvest loss data for developing countries was collected over 30 years ago, current global losses cannot be quantified. A significant gap exists in the understanding of the food waste implications of the rapid development of 'BRIC' economies. The limited data suggest that losses are much higher at the immediate post-harvest stages in developing countries and higher for perishable foods across industrialized and developing economies alike. For affluent economies, post-consumer food waste accounts for the greatest overall losses. To supplement the fragmentary picture and to gain a forward view, interviews were conducted with international FSC experts. The analyses highlighted the scale of the problem, the scope for improved system efficiencies and the challenges of affecting behavioural change to reduce post-consumer waste in affluent populations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2010.0126

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Baek,, 2009, Change of MSW composition attributed by ban on direct landfill of food waste in Korea
  2. Blond,, 1984, The agricultural development systems project in Egypt, 42
  3. Chen,, 2005, Changes in food retailing in Asia: implications of supermarket procurement practices for farmers and traditional marketing systems.
  4. Choudhury,, 2006, Recent developments in reducing post-harvest losses in the Asia-Pacific region., 5
  5. Exodus, 2006, Quantitative assessment of the nature, scale and origin of post consumer food waste arising in Great Britain.
  6. FAO, 1981, Food loss prevention in perishable crops
  7. FSA, 2008, Consumer attitudes to food standards
  8. Garnett,, 2006, Fruit and vegetables and UK greenhouse gas emissions: exploring the relationship.
  9. Grolleaud,, 2002, Post-harvest losses: discovering the full story
  10. Guerra,, 1998, Estudio de las perdidas post-cosecha en nueve rubros horticolas, Proc. Interam. Soc. Trop. Hort., 42, 404
  11. Liang,, 1993, China's post-harvest grain losses and the means of their reduction and elimination, Jingji dili (Econ. Geogr.), 1, 92
  12. Mercado-Villavieja,, 1976, A study of household edible food wastage in four regions of the Philippines, Philippine J. Nutr. Jan–June, 45
  13. Morgan,, 2009, Fruit and vegetable consumption and waste in Australia
  14. Pekcan,, 2006, Household food wastage in Turkey.
  15. Phan,, 1995, Drying research and application in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam
  16. Reardon,, 2007, and Berdegué J. A
  17. Rolle,, 2006, Improving postharvest management and marketing in the Asia-Pacific region: issues and challenges trends in the fruit and vegetable sector.
  18. Smil,, 2004, Feeding the world: how much more rice do we need?, 21
  19. United Nations, 2002, COMTRADE, Commodity Trade Data Base
  20. United Nations, 2008, World Urbanization Prospects, The 2007 Revision Population Database
  21. USEPA, 2009, Municipal solid waste generation, recycling, and disposal in the United States: facts and Figures for 2008
  22. World Economic Forum, 2010, Redesigning business value: a roadmap for sustainable consumption, 16
  23. World Food Programme, 2009, Hunger and markets
  24. WRAP, 2008, The food we waste
  25. WRAP, 2009, Household food and drink waste in the UK
  26. WRAP, 2009, Down the drain: quantification and exploration of food and drink waste disposed of to the sewer by households in the UK
  27. WRAP, 2010, A review of waste arisings in the supply of food and drink to UK households
  28. Yong,, 1997, Grain postproduction practices and loss estimates in South China, Agric. Mechanisation Asia Africa Latin Am., 28, 37

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3,197

Metadata

Authors
Parfitt, J., Barthel, M., & Macnaughton, S.
Affiliations
  • Resource Futures, Bristol, UK 1
  • Wrap (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Parfitt, Julian
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2010-09-27
Volume
365
Issue
1554
Pages
3065-3081
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2138803696
Cited by
3,197
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 148 · 2025: 229 · 2024: 233 · 2023: 278 · 2022: 286 · 2021: 330 · 2020: 359 · 2019: 310 · 2018: 254 · 2017: 209 · 2016: 166 · 2015: 136 · 2014: 116 · 2013: 73 · 2012: 46
FWCI
5.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Food Production Studies
Keywords
food waste, food supply chain, post-harvest losses, global food security, developing countries, BRIC countries, behavior change, food loss reduction
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Food Supply, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review