Cited by 54Fire effects on ecosystemsRangeland and Wildlife ManagementClimate variability and models

People, El Niño southern oscillation and fire in Australia: fire regimes and climate controls in hummock grasslands

Open access
Bliege Bird, Rebecca, Bird, Douglas W., Codding, Brian F.·2016·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

While evidence mounts that indigenous burning has a significant role in shaping pyrodiversity, the processes explaining its variation across local and external biophysical systems remain limited. This is especially the case with studies of climate–fire interactions, which only recognize an effect of humans on the fire regime when they act independently of climate. In this paper, we test the hypothesis that an anthropogenic fire regime (fire incidence, size and extent) does not covary with climate. In the lightning regime, positive El Niño southern oscillation (ENSO) values increase lightning fire incidence, whereas La Niña (and associated increases in prior rainfall) increase fire size. ENSO has the opposite effect in the Martu regime, decreasing ignitions in El Niño conditions without affecting fire size. Anthropogenic ignition rates covary positively with high antecedent rainfall, whereas fire size varies only with high temperatures and unpredictable winds, which may reduce control over fire spread. However, total area burned is similarly predicted by antecedent rainfall in both regimes, but is driven by increases in fire size in the lightning regime, and fire number in the anthropogenic regime. We conclude that anthropogenic regimes covary with climatic variation, but detecting the human–climate–fire interaction requires multiple measures of both fire regime and climate. This article is part of the themed issue ‘The interaction of fire and mankind’.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2015.0343

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Antecedent moisture conditions (10-y averages of PDSI) are a proxy for fuel production.

    “compared with decadal variability in PDSI by using 10-y averages of antecedent moisture conditions (27), a proxy for fuel production (B).”

    From Indigenous impacts on North American Great Plains fire regimes of the past millennium (2018) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Methods (page unavailable) use cumulative 24-month antecedent rainfall as a measure of fuel load and say rainfall affects fuel growth. This supports the general idea that prior moisture can proxy fuel production, but the paper does not use PDSI or 10-year averages. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Fire activity and fuels respond to previous moisture.

    “As fire activity and fuels respond to previous moisture, decadal variability in the PDSI record was measured by creating a 10-y antecedent average of annual PDSI values (PDSI ant10 ).”
  • This study lends support to the growing body of work indicating that coupled human-natural fire regimes should be understood as integral parts of food webs.

    “our study lends support to the growing body of work that indicates that coupled human-natural fire regimes should be understood as integral parts of food webs (27,49,68).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [10]10. Kay CE. 2007 Are lightning fires unnatural? A comparison of aboriginal and lightning ignition rates in the United States. In Proc. 23rd Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conf.: Fire in Grassland and Shrubland Ecosystems, pp. 16 -28. Tall Timbers Research Station, Tallahassee, FL.
  2. [15]15. Burrows N, Christensen P. 1991 A survey of aboriginal fire patterns in the Western Desert of Australia. In Fire and the environment: ecological and cultural perspectives: Proc. Int. Symp. Knoxville, TN (eds SC Nodvin, TA Waldrop). Gen. Tech. Rep. SE- 69. Asheville, NC: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station.
  3. [32]32. Codding BF, Bliege Bird R, Bird DW, Zeanah DW. 2016 Alternative aboriginal economies: Martu livelihoods in the 21st century. In Why forage? Hunters and gatherers in the 21st century (eds BF Codding, KL Kramer), pp. 185 -211. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
  4. [43]43. Bliege Bird R, Bird DW, Codding BF. 2016 Economic, social and ecological contexts of hunting, sharing and fire in the Western Desert of Australia. In Why forage? Hunters and gatherers in the 21st century (eds BF Codding, KL Kramer), pp. 213-230. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bliege Bird, R., Bird, D. W., & Codding, B. F.
Affiliations
  • Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2016-06-05
Volume
371
Issue
1696
Pages
20150343
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2398070095
Cited by
54
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 8
FWCI
5.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Stanford University Woods Institute for the Environment (112426)
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences (BCS-0850664)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
Keywords
ENSO, fire regimes, fire-climate interactions, lightning fires, anthropogenic ignition, antecedent rainfall, fire size, fire spread, pyrodiversity, La Niña, anthropogenic climate change
MeSH terms
Australia, Fires, Humans, El Nino-Southern Oscillation, Grassland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review