Cited by 27Embodied and Extended CognitionPhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceCognitive Science and Education Research

Out of the blue: understanding abrupt and wayward transitions in thought using probability and predictive processing

Open access
Mills, Caitlin, Zamani, Andre, White, Rebecca, Christoff, Kalina·2021·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

Abstract

Thoughts that appear to come to us ‘out of the blue’ or ‘out of nowhere’ are a familiar aspect of mental experience. Such thoughts tend to elicit feelings of surprise and spontaneity. Although we are beginning to understand the neural processes that underlie the arising of such thoughts, little is known about what accounts for their peculiar phenomenology. Here, we focus on one central aspect of this phenomenology—the experience of surprise at their occurrence, as it relates to internal probabilistic predictions regarding mental states. We introduce a distinction between two phenomenologically different types of transitions in thought content: (i) abrupt transitions , which occur at surprising times but lead to unsurprising thought content, and (ii) wayward transitions , which occur at surprising times and also lead to surprising thought content. We examine these two types of transitions using a novel approach that combines probabilistic and predictive processing concepts and principles. We employ two different probability metrics—transition and occurrence probability—to characterize and differentiate between abrupt and wayward transitions. We close by discussing some potentially beneficial ways in which these two kinds of transitions in thought content may contribute to mental function, and how they may be implemented at the neural level. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Offline perception: voluntary and spontaneous perceptual experiences without matching external stimulation’.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2019.0692

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The activation of weak associations may be a critical component of creative, flexible, and divergent thinking.

    “To the contrary, the activation of weak associations may be a critical component of creative, flexible, and divergent thinking [61–63].”

    From Constructive episodic simulation in dreams (2022) · cites this paper as [62]

    In “Surprising thoughts: a glitch or a feature?” (page unavailable), the paper suggests that wayward transitions broaden mental search to include thoughts with low baseline probability. This supports the idea that otherwise neglected thoughts can be useful, but it does not specifically connect activation of weak associations to creative, flexible, or divergent thinking. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [12]Klinger E, Cox WM 2011 Motivation and the goal theory of current concerns. In Handbook of motivational counseling: goal-based approaches to assessment and intervention with addiction and other problems, 2nd edn (eds Cox WM, Klinger E), pp. 3– 47. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.
  2. [44]Mills C, Herrera-Bennett A, Faber M, Christoff K 2018 Why the mind wanders: how spontaneous thought's default variability may support episodic efficiency and semantic optimization. In The Oxford handbook of spontaneous thought: mind-wandering, creativity, and dreaming (eds Fox KCR, Christoff K), pp. 11– 22. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  3. [59]Fox KCR, Christoff K 2018 The Oxford handbook of spontaneous thought: mind-wandering, creativity, and dreaming. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mills, C., Zamani, A., White, R., & Christoff, K.
Affiliations
  • University of New Hampshire (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Published
2020-12-14
Volume
376
Issue
1817
Pages
20190692
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W3113280510
Cited by
27
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Institute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction (MOP-115197)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN 327317-11)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
Keywords
spontaneous thought, abrupt transitions, surprise, predictive processing, probabilistic forecasting, transition probabilities, probability of occurrence, phenomenology of thought
MeSH terms
Attention, Cognition, Humans, Probability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review