PreprintCited by 100Forensic and Genetic ResearchPaleopathology and ancient diseasesPleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Minimally Destructive Protocol for DNA Extraction from Ancient Teeth

Open access

Abstract

Ancient DNA sampling methods—although optimized for efficient DNA extraction—are destructive, relying on drilling or cutting and powdering (parts of) bones and teeth. As the field of ancient DNA has grown, so have concerns about the impact of destructive sampling of the skeletal remains from which ancient DNA is obtained. Due to a particularly high concentration of endogenous DNA, the cementum of tooth roots is often targeted for ancient DNA sampling, but standard destructive sampling methods often result in the loss of at least one entire root. Here, we present a minimally destructive method for extracting ancient DNA from dental cementum present on the surface of tooth roots. This method does not require destructive drilling or grinding, and, following extraction, the tooth remains safe to handle and suitable for most morphological studies, as well as other biochemical studies, such as radiocarbon dating. We extracted and sequenced ancient DNA from 30 teeth (and 9 corresponding petrous bones) using this minimally destructive extraction method in addition to a typical tooth sampling method. We find that the minimally destructive method can provide ancient DNA that is of comparable quality to extracts produced from teeth that have undergone destructive sampling processes. Further, we find that a rigorous cleaning of the tooth surface combining diluted bleach and UV light irradiation seems sufficient to minimize external contaminants usually removed through the physical removal of a superficial layer when sampling through regular powdering methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2020.08.19.256412

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Minimally-destructive methods have been proposed to sample bones, teeth, insects or plants to maximize preservation of remains' integrity and allow further analyses.

    “In order to maximize preservation of the remains' integrity and allow potential further molecular or morphological analyses, minimally-destructive methods have been proposed to sample bones 96 , teeth 97 , insects 98 or plants 99 , for example.”

    From Ancient DNA analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [97]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.03.002 · DOI
  2. 2008, The mineralized osteocyte: a living fossil, American Journal of Physical Anthropology: The Official Publication of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, 137, 449, 10.1002/ajpa.20886 · DOI
  3. 10.1002/ajpa.21647 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1997.tb00095.x · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.10.002 · DOI
  6. 2019, Powder-Free DNA Extraction from Post-Mortem Teeth, J Forensic Res, 10, 2
  7. 10.1073/pnas.1314445110 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1101/cshperspect.a012567 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 2015, Improving access to endogenous DNA in ancient bones and teeth, Scientific reports, 5, 11184, 10.1038/srep11184 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1073/pnas.1717873115 · DOI
  11. Freeman E. 1994. Oral histology: development, structure, and function. Periodontium Mosby, St Louis: 276–312.
  12. 10.1038/nature14558 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1038/nature13810 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1073/pnas.1221359110 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 2014, Genome flux and stasis in a five millennium transect of European prehistory, Nature communications, 5, 5257, 10.1038/ncomms6257 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1101/gr.219675.116 · DOI
  17. 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.1.52 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/nature14317 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Hansen HB , Damgaard PB , Margaryan A , Stenderup J , Lynnerup N , Willerslev E , Allentoft ME. 2017. Comparing ancient DNA preservation in petrous bone and tooth cementum. PloS one 12. · DOI
  20. 2013, Teeth as a source of DNA for forensic identification of human remains: a review, Science & Justice, 53, 433, 10.1016/j.scijus.2013.06.001 · DOI
  21. 2013, Targeted sampling of cementum for recovery of nuclear DNA from human teeth and the impact of common decontamination measures, Investigative genetics, 4, 18, 10.1186/2041-2223-4-18 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt193 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.2144/000114320 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 2018, A combined method for DNA analysis and radiocarbon dating from a single sample, Scientific reports, 8, 1
  25. 10.1186/s12859-014-0356-4 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1038/548158a · DOI
  28. 10.1038/nature16152 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Nakatsuka NJ , Harney E , Mallick S , Mah M , Patterson N , Reich DE. 2020. ContamLD: Estimation of Ancient Nuclear DNA Contamination Using Breakdown of Linkage Disequilibrium. bioRxiv. · DOI
  30. 10.1371/journal.pone.0129102 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Pinhasi R , Fernandes DM , Sirak K , Cheronet O. 2019. Isolating the human cochlea to generate bone powder for ancient DNA analysis. Nature protocols: 1. · DOI
  32. 10.15184/aqy.2018.70 · DOI
  33. Rohland N , Glocke I , Aximu-Petri A , Meyer M. 2018. Extraction of highly degraded DNA from ancient bones, teeth and sediments for high-throughput sequencing. Nature Protocols: 1. · DOI
  34. 10.1098/rstb.2013.0624 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 2007, Ancient DNA extraction from bones and teeth, Nature protocols, 2, 1756, 10.1038/nprot.2007.247 · DOI
  36. 2004, Nondestructive DNA extraction method for mitochondrial DNA analyses of museum specimens, Biotechniques, 36, 814, 10.2144/04365ST05 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1371/journal.pone.0034131 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1101/gr.260141.119 · DOI
  39. 10.2144/000114558 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Sirak KA , Sedig JW. 2019. Balancing analytical goals and anthropological stewardship in the midst of the paleogenomics revolution. World Archaeology: 1–14. · DOI
  41. 10.1073/pnas.1524306113 · DOI
  42. 10.1177/0022034516641898 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Ancient DNA analysis

    Orlando, L., Allaby, R., Skoglund, P., Der Sarkissian, C., Stockhammer, P. W., Ávila-Arcos, M. C., Fu, Q., Krause, J., Willerslev, E., Stone, A. C., et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-020-00011-0 · Cited by 411

Metadata

Authors
Harney, É., Cheronet, O., Fernandes, D. M., Sirak, K., Mah, M., Bernardos, R., Adamski, N., Broomandkhoshbacht, N., Callan, K., Lawson, A. M., Oppenheimer, J., Stewardson, K., Zalzala, F., Anders, A., Candilio, F., Constantinescu, M., Coppa, A., Ciobanu, I., Dani, J., Gallina, Z., Genchi, F., Nagy, E. G., Hajdu, T., Hellebrandt, M., Horváth, A., Király, Á., Kiss, K., Kolozsi, B., Kovács, P., Köhler, K., Lucci, M., Pap, I., Popovici, S., Raczky, P., Simalcsik, A., Szeniczey, T., Vasilyev, S., Virag, C., Rohland, N., Reich, D., & Pinhasi, R.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Eötvös Loránd University (HU)
  • Institutul de Antropologie "Francisc I. Rainer" (RO)
  • Deri Muzeum (HU)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • Ottó Herman Museum (HU)
  • ELTE Research Centre for the Humanities (HU)
  • Damjanich János Múzeum (HU)
  • Hungarian Natural History Museum (HU)
  • National Agency for Archaeology (MD)
  • Romanian Academy (RO)
  • Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
Venue
Genome Research
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2020-08-19
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
472-483
ISSN
1088-9051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3127103176
Cited by
100
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome Research (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ELTE Digital Institutional Repository (EDIT) (Eötvös Loránd University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • John Templeton Foundation (grant 61220, 61220)
  • Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal (K124326)
  • Nemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós Alap
  • National Research, Development and Innovation Office (K124326)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Paleopathology and ancient diseases
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Keywords
ancient DNA extraction, ancient teeth, dental cementum, petrous bone, radiocarbon dating, surface contamination removal, UV irradiation, endogenous DNA
MeSH terms
DNA, Ancient, Dental Cementum, Humans, Male, Tooth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review