PreprintCited by 96SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesCOVID-19 epidemiological studies

SARS-CoV-2 responsive T cell numbers and anti-Spike IgG levels are both associated with protection from COVID-19: A prospective cohort study in keyworkers

Wyllie, David, Jones, Hayley E, Mulchandani, Ranya, Trickey, Adam, Taylor-Phillips, Sian, Brooks, Tim, Charlett, Andre, Ades, AE +8 more·2020·medRxiv

Abstract

Background: Immune correlates of protection from COVID-19 are important, but incompletely understood. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study in 2,826 participants working in hospitals and Fire and Police services in England, UK during the pandemic (ISRCTN5660922). Of these, 2,672 were unselected volunteers recruited irrespective of previous SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test results, and 154 others were recruited separately specifically because they previously tested positive. At recruitment in June 2020, we measured numbers of interferon-y; secreting, SARS-CoV-2 responsive T cells using T-SPOT Discovery SARS-CoV-2 kits (Oxford Immunotec Ltd), and antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 proteins using commercial immunoassays. We then described time to microbiologically confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, stratified by immunological parameters. Results: T cells responsive to the spike (S), nuclear (N) and membrane proteins (M) dominated the responses measured. Using the sum of the spots (responsive cells within each well of 250,000 peripheral blood mononuclear cells) for S, N and M antigens minus the control, the 2,672 unselected participants were divided into those with higher responses (n=669, 25.4%; median 30 spots (IQR 18,54)) and those with low responses (n=2016, 76.7%, median 3 (IQR 1,6)), the cutoff we derived being 12 spots. Of the participants with higher T cell responses, 367 (53%) had detectable antibodies against the N or S proteins. During a median of 118 days follow-up, 20 participan…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2020.11.02.20222778

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some evidence suggests that people with more IFNγ-secreting T cells against SARS-CoV-2 spike, nuclear, and membrane proteins may be better protected from disease.

    “There are indications that individuals with higher levels of IFNγ-secreting T cells (measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot) against the S protein, nuclear proteins and membrane proteins of SARS-CoV-2 may have better protection from disease50.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wyllie, D., Jones, H. E., Mulchandani, R., Trickey, A., Taylor-Phillips, S., Brooks, T., Charlett, A., Ades, A., EDSAB-HOME investigators, Moore, P., Boyes, J., Hormis, A., Todd, N., Reckless, I., Makin, A., & Oliver, I.
Affiliations
  • Public Health England (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • The Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Milton Keynes Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Wyllie, David
Venue
medRxiv
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2020-11-04
OpenAlex
W3095375824
Cited by
96
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 6
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (CDF-2016-09-018)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 protection, correlates of protection, interferon-gamma, anti-spike IgG, essential workers, serological testing, COVID-19 pandemic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review