PreprintCited by 53Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities

The retrotransposon R2 maintains Drosophila ribosomal DNA repeats

Open access
Nelson, Jonathan O., Slicko, Alyssa, Yamashita, Yukiko M.·2021·bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Abstract

Ribosomal DNA (rDNA) loci contain the hundreds of tandemly repeated copies of ribosomal RNA genes needed to support cellular viability. This repetitiveness makes it highly susceptible to copy number (CN) loss, threatening multi-generational maintenance of rDNA. How this threat is counteracted to avoid extinction of the lineage has remained unclear. Here, we show that the rDNA-specific retrotransposon R2 is essential for rDNA CN maintenance in the Drosophila male germline, despite the perceived disruptive nature of transposable elements. Depletion of R2 led to defective rDNA CN maintenance, causing a decline in fecundity over generations and eventual extinction. This study reveals that active retrotransposons can provide a benefit to their hosts, contrary to their reputation as genomic parasites, which may contribute to their widespread success throughout taxa. One Sentence Summary: The retrotransposon R2 initiates restoration of ribosomal DNA copies to trans-generationally maintain essential locus.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.07.12.451825

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nelson, J. O., Slicko, A., & Yamashita, Y. M.
Affiliations
  • Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Yamashita, Yukiko M.
Venue
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-07-12
OpenAlex
W3182763640
Cited by
7
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • American Cancer Society (133949-PF-19-133-01-DMC)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Keywords
ribosomal DNA, transposable elements, male germline, Drosophila, fecundity decline, lineage extinction, genomic parasites

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review