PreprintCited by 2

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Dietary restriction of isoleucine increases healthspan and lifespan of genetically heterogeneous mice

Green, Cara L., Trautman, Michaela E., Babygirija, Reji, Jain, Raghav, Chaiyakul, Krittisak, Pak, Heidi H., Bleicher, Anneliese, Novak, Grace, Sonsalla, Michelle M., Yeh, Chung-Yang, Calubag, Mariah F., Liu, Teresa T., Flores, Victoria, Newman, Sarah, Ricke, Will A., Matkowskyj, Kristina A., Ong, Irene M., Simcox, Judith, Lamming, Dudley W.·2022

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.cmet.2023.10.005

Abstract

Low protein (LP) diets promote health and longevity in diverse species. Although the precise components of an LP diet that mediate its beneficial effects have not been defined, reducing dietary levels of the three branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) leucine, isoleucine and valine promotes metabolic health in both sexes, and increases lifespan while reducing frailty in male, but not female, C57BL/6J mice. Each BCAA has unique metabolic effects, and we recently showed that restriction of isoleucine is both sufficient to promote metabolic health and required for the metabolic benefits of an LP diet in male C57BL/6J mice. Here, we tested the hypothesis that specifically restricting isoleucine could promote healthy aging in genetically heterogenous UM-HET3 mice. We find that a reduced isoleucine diet improves the metabolic health of both young and old HET3 mice, promoting leanness and glycemic control. Restriction of isoleucine starting in adult, 6 month old HET3 mice reprograms hepatic metabolism in a way distinct from an LP diet. Finally, we find that a reduced isoleucine diet reduces frailty and extends the lifespan of both male and female HET3 mice, but to a much greater degree in males. Our results demonstrate that restricting dietary isoleucine can increase health span and longevity in a genetically diverse population of mice, and suggests that reducing dietary levels of isoleucine may have great potential as a geroprotective intervention.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.10.06.511051

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 67

  1. 10.1038/s41596-019-0256-1 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 1995, Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 57, 289, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1038/s41387-022-00200-8 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/ncomms4557 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1113/JP275075 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/s41467-019-11311-9 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1038/s41598-022-07605-6 · DOI
  8. 10.3390/nu14132670 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/0471142727.mb3004s114 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1113/JP283261 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/gerona/glq155 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.092 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1002/oby.22919 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.mad.2018.07.004 · DOI
  15. 10.1038/s42255-021-00434-3 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.12.018 · DOI
  17. 10.1210/jc.2007-1136 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/s42255-019-0121-0 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/s41467-022-29714-6 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/acel.12170 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1038/nature08221 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1038/s41467-022-29499-8 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1038/s41598-017-07498-w · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.05.022 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1038/nm.4057 · DOI
  26. 10.1002/nau.22692 · DOI
  27. 10.1021/ac9019522 · DOI
  28. 10.1172/JCI74915 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01774.x · DOI
  30. 10.1186/2193-1801-3-735 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1126/science.1215135 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.18637/jss.v025.i01 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/ncomms4592 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/s41598-017-10381-3 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.02.006 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111187 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.molmet.2017.06.009 · DOI
  38. 10.1172/JCI85946 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1093/jn/10.1.63 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2005.00152.x · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1093/gerona/glq178 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1111/acel.12194 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.cmet.2018.10.013 · DOI
  44. 10.1093/jn/123.2.269 · DOI
  45. 10.1126/science.45.1160.294 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/s41598-018-37177-3 · DOI
  47. 10.1038/s43587-020-00006-2 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1093/nar/gkv007 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1096/fj.07-9261com · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.2337/dc09-1321 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.02.009 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.05.007 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1016/j.exger.2016.03.011 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1111/acel.12496 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1371/journal.pone.0057300 · DOI
  57. 10.1038/s42255-021-00393-9 · DOI
  58. 10.1152/ajprenal.00245.2018 · DOI
  59. 10.1093/jn/116.4.641 · DOI
  60. 10.1093/gerona/glt136 · DOI
  61. 10.1126/science.aab2674 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1038/s41467-020-16568-z · DOI
  63. 10.1111/acel.12796 · DOI
  64. 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.03.025 · DOI
  65. 10.1096/fj.201701211R · DOI
  66. 10.1093/nar/gkx1098 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1038/ng1196 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Green, C. L., Trautman, M. E., Babygirija, R., Jain, R., Chaiyakul, K., Pak, H. H., Bleicher, A., Novak, G., Sonsalla, M. M., Yeh, C.-Y., Calubag, M. F., Liu, T. T., Flores, V., Newman, S., Ricke, W. A., Matkowskyj, K. A., Ong, I. M., Simcox, J., & Lamming, D. W.
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-10-08
Cited by
2
References
0
Type
Preprint

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review