Cited by 207Dietary Effects on HealthGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsDiet, Metabolism, and Disease

Dietary Protein to Carbohydrate Ratio and Caloric Restriction: Comparing Metabolic Outcomes in Mice

Open access
Solon-Biet, Samantha M., Mitchell, Sarah J., Coogan, Sean C.P., Cogger, Victoria C., Gokarn, Rahul, McMahon, Aisling C., Raubenheimer, David, de Cabo, Rafael +2 more·2015·Cell Reports

Abstract

Both caloric restriction (CR) and low-protein, high-carbohydrate (LPHC) ad-libitum-fed diets increase lifespan and improve metabolic parameters such as insulin, glucose, and blood lipids. Severe CR, however, is unsustainable for most people; therefore, it is important to determine whether manipulating macronutrient ratios in ad-libitum-fed conditions can generate similar health outcomes. We present the results of a short-term (8 week) dietary manipulation on metabolic outcomes in mice. We compared three diets varying in protein to carbohydrate ratio under both CR and ad libitum conditions. Ad libitum LPHC diets delivered similar benefits to CR in terms of levels of insulin, glucose, lipids, and HOMA, despite increased energy intake. CR on LPHC diets did not provide additional benefits relative to ad libitum LPHC. We show that LPHC diets under ad-libitum-fed conditions generate the metabolic benefits of CR without a 40% reduction in total caloric intake.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.05.007

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Solon-Biet, S. M., Mitchell, S. J., Coogan, S. C. P., Cogger, V. C., Gokarn, R., McMahon, A. C., Raubenheimer, D., de Cabo, R., Simpson, S. J., & Le Couteur, D. G.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Simpson, Stephen J.
Venue
Cell Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
11
Issue
10
Pages
1529-1534
ISSN
2211-1247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148853147
Cited by
207
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 2
FWCI
15.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Reports (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (Z01AG000363, ZIAAG000368)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
Keywords
caloric restriction, protein-carbohydrate ratio, low-protein high-carbohydrate diet, ad libitum feeding, metabolic health, insulin, glucose, serum lipids, HOMA-IR, lifespan, energy intake, macronutrient ratio, mice
MeSH terms
Animals, Energy Intake, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Proteins, Glucose, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Random Allocation, Caloric Restriction, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review