PreprintCited by 103Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

De novo protein design by inversion of the AlphaFold structure prediction network

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1002/pro.4653 · Paper page

Abstract

De novo protein design enhances our understanding of the principles that govern protein folding and interactions, and has the potential to revolutionize biotechnology through the engineering of novel protein functionalities. Despite recent progress in computational design strategies, de novo design of protein structures remains challenging, given the vast size of the sequence-structure space. AlphaFold2 (AF2), a state-of-the-art neural network architecture, achieved remarkable accuracy in predicting protein structures from amino acid sequences. This raises the question whether AF2 has learned the principles of protein folding sufficiently for de novo design. Here, we sought to answer this question by inverting the AF2 network, using the prediction weight set and a loss function to bias the generated sequences to adopt a target fold. Initial design trials resulted in de novo designs with an overrepresentation of hydrophobic residues on the protein surface compared to their natural protein family, requiring additional surface optimization. In silico validation of the designs showed protein structures with the correct fold, a hydrophilic surface and a densely packed hydrophobic core. In vitro validation showed that several designs were folded and stable in solution with high melting temperatures. In summary, our design workflow solely based on AF2 does not seem to fully capture basic principles of de novo protein design, as observed in the protein surface’s hydrophobic vs. hydrophilic patterning. However, with minimal post-design intervention, these pipelines generated viable sequences as assessed experimental characterization. Thus such pipelines show the potential to contribute to solving outstanding challenges in de novo protein design.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.12.13.520346

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. 2017, The Rosetta All-Atom Energy Function for Macromolecular Modeling and Design, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 13, 3031, 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00125 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Anand, N. , Eguchi, R. , & Huang, P.-S. (2022). Fully differentiable full-atom protein backbone generation. https://openreview.net/forum?id=SJxnVL8YOV
  3. 2021, De novo protein design by deep network hallucination, Nature, 600, 7889
  4. 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 2018, Rosetta FunFolDes – A general framework for the computational design of functional proteins, PLOS Computational Biology, 14, e1006623, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006623 · DOI
  7. 2014, Proof of principle for epitope-focused vaccine design, Nature, 507, 7491
  8. 10.1126/science.278.5335.82 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.add2187 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 2018, De novo design of a fluorescence-activating β-barrel, Nature, 561, 7724
  11. 2022, Ig-VAE: Generative modeling of protein structure by direct 3D coordinate generation, PLOS Computational Biology, 18, e1010271, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010271 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 2015, A general strategy to construct small molecule biosensors in eukaryotes, ELife, 4, e10606, 10.7554/eLife.10606 · DOI
  13. Gainza, P. , Wehrle, S. , Hall-Beauvais, A. V. , Marchand, A. , Scheck, A. , Harteveld, Z. , Ni, D. , Tan, S. , Sverrisson, F. , Goverde, C. , Turelli, P. , Raclot, C. , Teslenko, A. , Pacesa, M. , Rosset, S. , Georgeon, S. , Marsden, J. , Petruzzella, A. , Liu, K. , … Correia, B. E. (2022). De novo design of site-specific protein interactions with learned surface fingerprints (p. 2022.06.16.496402). bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.16.496402 · DOI
  14. 2020, A computationally designed chimeric antigen receptor provides a small-molecule safety switch for T-cell therapy, Nature Biotechnology, 38, 4
  15. 10.1038/ng0193-3 · DOI
  16. 10.1126/science.aax8780 · DOI
  17. Guo, X. , Du, Y. , Tadepalli, S. , Zhao, L. , & Shehu, A. (2021). Generating Tertiary Protein Structures via an Interpretative Variational Autoencoder (arXiv:2004.07119). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2004.07119 · DOI
  18. 1970, Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications, Biometrika, 57, 13
  19. 10.1093/bioinformatics/12.2.135 · DOI
  20. 2006, Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 65, 712, 10.1002/prot.21123 · DOI
  21. 2016, De novo design of a four-fold symmetric TIM-barrel protein with atomic-level accuracy, Nature Chemical Biology, 12, 1
  22. Ingraham, J. , Garg, V. , Barzilay, R. , & Jaakkola, T. (2019). Generative Models for Graph-Based Protein Design. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2019/hash/f3a4ff4839c56a5f460c88cce3666a2b-Abstract.html
  23. Jendrusch, M. , Korbel, J. O. , & Sadiq, S. K. (2021). AlphaDesign: A de novo protein design framework based on AlphaFold (p. 2021.10.11.463937). bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.11.463937 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1126/science.1152692 · DOI
  25. 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Kingma, D. P. , & Ba, J. (2017). Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization (arXiv:1412.6980). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1412.6980 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005409 · DOI
  28. 2012, Principles for designing ideal protein structures, Nature, 491, 7423
  29. 10.1126/science.1089427 · DOI
  30. 2019, De novo design of bioactive protein switches, Nature, 572, 7768
  31. 2022, Assessing and enhancing foldability in designed proteins, Protein Science, 31, e4400, 10.1002/pro.4400 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 2022, Computational design of novel protein–protein interactions – An overview on methodological approaches and applications, Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 74, 102370, 10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102370 · DOI
  33. 2018, De novo design of a non-local β-sheet protein with high stability and accuracy, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 25, 11
  34. 2022, ColabFold: Making protein folding accessible to all, Nature Methods, 19, 6
  35. Moffat, L. , Greener, J. G. , & Jones, D. T. (2021). Using AlphaFold for Rapid and Accurate Fixed Backbone Protein Design (p. 2021.08.24.457549). bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.24.457549 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Norn, C. , Wicky, B. I. M. , Juergens, D. , Liu, S. , Kim, D. , Koepnick, B. , Anishchenko, I. , Players, F. , Baker, D. , & Ovchinnikov, S. (2020). Protein sequence design by explicit energy landscape optimization (p. 2020.07.23.218917). bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.23.218917 · DOI
  37. 2021, Structure-based protein design with deep learning, Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, 65, 136, 10.1016/j.cbpa.2021.08.004 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 2021, High-accuracy protein structure prediction in CASP14, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 89, 1687, 10.1002/prot.26171 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1110/ps.32501 · DOI
  40. 2008, Kemp elimination catalysts by computational enzyme design, Nature, 453, 7192
  41. 10.1126/science.aay5051 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1126/science.1190239 · DOI
  43. Simonyan, K. , Vedaldi, A. , & Zisserman, A. (2014). Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps (arXiv:1312.6034). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1312.6034 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 2013, Computational design of ligand-binding proteins with high affinity and selectivity, Nature, 501, 7466
  45. Tischer, D. , Lisanza, S. , Wang, J. , Dong, R. , Anishchenko, I. , Milles, L. F. , Ovchinnikov, S. , & Baker, D. (2020). Design of proteins presenting discontinuous functional sites using deep learning (p. 2020.11.29.402743). bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.29.402743 · DOI
  46. 10.1126/science.abn2100 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1126/science.add1964 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 2021, Bottom-up de novo design of functional proteins with complex structural features, Nature Chemical Biology, 17, 4
  49. 10.1073/pnas.1914677117 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 2004, Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 57, 702, 10.1002/prot.20264 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1093/nar/gki524 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Goverde, C., Wolf, B., Khakzad, H., Rosset, S., & Correia, B. E.
Affiliations
  • SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (CH)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Corresponding author
Correia, Bruno E.
Venue
Protein Science
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-12-15
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
e4653-e4653
ISSN
0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4376131109
Cited by
103
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 16
FWCI
9.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Protein Science (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • Centro Svizzero di Calcolo Scientifico
  • National Supercomputing Centre Singapore
  • H2020 European Research Council (716058)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
de novo protein design, AlphaFold2, network inversion, protein folding, hydrophobic surfaces, hydrophobic core, protein stability, in vitro folding, protein engineering
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Furylfuramide, Proteins, Protein Engineering, Protein Folding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review