PreprintCited by 27Ubiquitin and proteasome pathwaysProtein Degradation and InhibitorsEnzyme Structure and Function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bimodular architecture of bacterial effector SAP05 drives ubiquitin-independent targeted protein degradation

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1073/pnas.2310664120

Abstract

In eukaryotes, targeted protein degradation (TPD) typically depends on a series of interactions among ubiquitin ligases that transfer ubiquitin molecules to substrates leading to degradation by the 26S proteasome. We previously discovered that the bacterial effector protein SAP05 mediates ubiquitin-independent TPD. SAP05 forms a ternary complex via interactions with the von Willebrand Factor Type A (vWA) domain of the proteasomal ubiquitin receptor Rpn10 and the Zinc-finger (ZnF) domains of the SQUAMOSA-PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE (SPL) and GATA BINDING FACTOR (GATA) transcription factors (TFs). This leads to direct TPD of the TFs by the 26S proteasome. Here, we report the crystal structures of the SAP05-vWA complex at 2.17 Å resolution and of the SAP05-ZnF(SPL5) complex at 2.20 Å resolution. Structural analyses revealed that SAP05 displays a unique bimodular architecture with two distinct non-overlapping surfaces, a ‘loop surface’ with three protruding loops that form electrostatic interactions with ZnF, and a ‘sheet surface’ featuring two β-sheets, loops and ⍺-helices that establish polar interactions with vWA. SAP05 binding to ZnF TFs involves single amino acids responsible for multiple contacts, while SAP05 binding to vWA is more stable due to the necessity of multiple mutations to break the interaction. In addition, positioning of the SAP05 complex on the 26S proteasome points to a mechanism of protein degradation. Collectively, our findings demonstrate how a small bacterial bimodular protein can bypass the canonical UPS cellular proteolysis pathway, enabling ubiquitin-independent TPD in eukaryotic cells. This knowledge holds significant potential for the creation of novel TPD technologies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.06.19.545293

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-062917-011931 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/0471140864.ps2101s21 · DOI
  3. 2021, Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC): a standard operating procedure (SOP), Eur. Biophys. J, 50, 363, 10.1007/s00249-021-01509-5 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80929-0 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.pep.2005.09.022 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/nar/gkm047 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/nrm3741 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1007/978-1-62703-764-8_15 · DOI
  9. 2011, TAL effectors: customizable proteins for DNA targeting, Science (New York, NY), 333, 1843, 10.1126/science.1204094 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 2018, Ubiquitin-independent protein degradation in proteasomes, Biomed. Khim, 64, 134, 10.18097/PBMC20186402134 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/embo-reports/kve203 · DOI
  12. 2020, Cryo-EM Reveals Unanchored M1-Ubiquitin Chain Binding at hRpn11 of the 26S Proteasome, Structure, 28, 1206, 10.1016/j.str.2020.07.011 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.beha.2017.09.001 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.04.023 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1038/nrmicro2148 · DOI
  16. 2021, Mechanisms of substrate recognition by the 26S proteasome, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol, 67, 161, 10.1016/j.sbi.2020.10.010 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1093/nar/gkn180 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 2023, Ubiquitin receptor PSMD4/Rpn10 is a novel therapeutic target in multiple myeloma, Blood, 141, 2599
  19. 10.1074/jbc.M404020200 · DOI
  20. 10.1107/S0907444910007493 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1107/S0907444913000061 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07531.x · DOI
  23. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.081507.101607 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81603-7 · DOI
  25. 10.1128/MCB.00509-07 · DOI
  26. 10.1101/gr.143000 · DOI
  27. 10.1094/MPMI-22-2-0115 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.cell.2021.08.029 · DOI
  29. Huang, W. , and Hogenhout, S.A . (2022). Interfering with plant developmental timing promotes susceptibility to insect vectors of a bacterial parasite. Biorxiv, https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.30.486463. · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.sbi.2014.02.002 · DOI
  31. 2022, Cryo-EM structure of the plant 26S proteasome, Plant Commun, 3, 100310, 10.1016/j.xplc.2022.100310 · DOI
  32. 2022, A phytoplasma effector acts as a ubiquitin-like mediator between floral MADS-box proteins and proteasome shuttle proteins, Plant Cell, 34, 1709, 10.1093/plcell/koac062 · DOI
  33. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060310-170328 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 2023, A Pipeline to Monitor Proteasome Homeostasis in Plants, Methods Mol. Biol, 2581, 351, 10.1007/978-1-0716-2784-6_25 · DOI
  35. 2017, Tools to investigate the ubiquitin proteasome system, Drug Discov. Today Technol, 26, 25, 10.1016/j.ddtec.2017.11.006 · DOI
  36. 2013, Single step BP/LR combined Gateway reactions, BioTechniques, 55, 265, 10.2144/000114101 · DOI
  37. 2021, Structure-guided bifunctional molecules hit a DEUBAD-lacking hRpn13 species upregulated in multiple myeloma, Nat. Commun, 12, 7318, 10.1038/s41467-021-27570-4 · DOI
  38. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001835 · DOI
  39. 2021, Structure, Dynamics and Function of the 26S Proteasome, Subcell. Biochem, 96, 1, 10.1007/978-3-030-58971-4_1 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/nsmb.2616 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1107/S0021889807021206 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1107/S0907444911007281 · DOI
  43. 10.1111/febs.13766 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 2019, The Bacterial Proteasome at the Core of Diverse Degradation Pathways, Front Mol. Biosci, 6, 23, 10.3389/fmolb.2019.00023 · DOI
  45. 10.1038/nrm2630 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1107/S0907444911001314 · DOI
  47. 10.1007/978-1-61779-228-1_27 · DOI
  48. 10.1038/ncomms1752 · DOI
  49. Richard, E. , Michael, O.N. , Alexander, P. , Natasha, A. , Andrew, S. , Tim, G. , Augustin, Ž ., Russ, B. , Sam, B. , Jason, Y. , et al. (2022). Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. bioRxiv, 2021.2010.2004.463034.
  50. 10.1038/s41580-018-0040-z · DOI · Paper page
  51. 2017, Ubiquitin recognition by the proteasome, J. Biochem, 161, 113
  52. 10.1073/pnas.1119394109 · DOI
  53. 10.1107/S2052252517017961 · DOI
  54. 10.1038/s41467-018-04731-6 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.2183/pjab.85.12 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.014 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.03.007 · DOI
  58. 10.1093/nar/gky427 · DOI
  59. 10.1038/nature11259 · DOI
  60. 2011, Ggplot2, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 3, 180, 10.1002/wics.147 · DOI
  61. 10.1107/S0907444910045749 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1107/S0021889809045701 · DOI
  63. 10.1107/S2059798317017235 · DOI
  64. 10.1111/pce.13633 · DOI
  65. 10.1038/nprot.2007.199 · DOI
  66. 2017, Recognition of Client Proteins by the Proteasome, Annu. Rev. Biophys, 46, 149, 10.1146/annurev-biophys-070816-033719 · DOI
  67. 2019, Characterization of Enzymatic Reactions Using ITC, Methods Mol. Biol, 1964, 251, 10.1007/978-1-4939-9179-2_18 · DOI
  68. 10.1038/s41467-018-03785-w · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Liu, Q., Maqbool, A., Mirkin, F. G., Singh, Y., Stevenson, C. E. M., Lawson, D. M., Kamoun, S., Huang, W., & Hogenhout, S. A.
Affiliations
  • John Innes Centre (GB)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Huang, Weijie
  • Hogenhout, Saskia A.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-06-19
Volume
120
Issue
49
Pages
e2310664120-e2310664120
ISSN
0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389235805
Cited by
27
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 3
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (23ZR1470300)
  • Diamond Light Source (MX25108)
  • UK Research and Innovation (BBS/E/J/000PR9797, EP/X024415/1, BB/X010996/1)
  • Human Frontier Science Program (RGP0024/2015)
  • Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (23ZR1470300)
  • John Innes Foundation
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/X024415/1)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBS/E/JI/230001B, BB/X010996/1, BBS/E/J/000PR9797)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
bacterial effector proteins, targeted protein degradation, ubiquitin-independent degradation, Rpn10, von Willebrand factor type A domain, zinc finger transcription factor, SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE, 26S proteasome, protein-protein interaction, crystal structure, plant-pathogen interaction
MeSH terms
Carrier Proteins, Protein Binding, Ubiquitin, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Eukaryota, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review