PreprintCited by 18Protein Structure and DynamicsBiochemical and Structural CharacterizationSupramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Local structural flexibility drives oligomorphism in computationally designed protein assemblies

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41594-025-01490-z · Paper page

Abstract

Many naturally occurring protein assemblies have dynamic structures that allow them to perform specialized functions. For example, clathrin coats adopt a wide variety of architectures to adapt to vesicular cargos of various sizes. Although computational methods for designing novel self-assembling proteins have advanced substantially over the past decade, most existing methods focus on designing static structures with high accuracy. Here we characterize the structures of three distinct computationally designed protein assemblies that each form multiple unanticipated architectures, and identify flexibility in specific regions of the subunits of each assembly as the source of structural diversity. Cryo-EM single-particle reconstructions and native mass spectrometry showed that only two distinct architectures were observed in two of the three cases, while we obtained six cryo-EM reconstructions that likely represent a subset of the architectures present in solution in the third case. Structural modeling and molecular dynamics simulations indicated that the surprising observation of a defined range of architectures, instead of non-specific aggregation, can be explained by constrained flexibility within the building blocks. Our results suggest that deliberate use of structural flexibility as a design principle will allow exploration of previously inaccessible structural and functional space in designed protein assemblies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2023.10.18.562842

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 92

  1. 2011, Rationally engineering natural protein assemblies in nanobiotechnology, Curr Opin Biotechnol, 22, 485, 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.05.003 · DOI
  2. 2016, Bioengineered protein-based nanocage for drug delivery, Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 106, 157, 10.1016/j.addr.2016.03.002 · DOI
  3. 2022, Engineering Self-Assembling Protein Nanoparticles for Therapeutic Delivery, Bioconjug Chem, 33, 2018, 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.2c00030 · DOI
  4. Basu Mallik B , Stanislaw J , Alawathurage TM , Khmelinskaia A . De novo design of polyhedral protein assemblies: before and after the AI revolution. Chembiochem 2023;: e202300117. · DOI
  5. 10.1126/science.1219364 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/nature13404 · DOI
  7. 10.1126/science.aaf8818 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/nature18010 · DOI
  9. Yang EC , Divine R , Miranda MC , Borst AJ , Sheffler W , Zhang JZ , et al. Computational design of non-porous, pH-responsive antibody nanoparticles. bioRxiv. 2023;: 2023.04.17.537263. · DOI
  10. Huddy TF , Hsia Y , Kibler RD , Xu J , Bethel N , Nagarajan D , et al. Blueprinting expandable nanomaterials with standardized protein building blocks. bioRxiv. 2023;: 2023.06.09.544258. · DOI
  11. Lee S , Kibler RD , Hsia Y , Borst AJ , Philomin A , Kennedy MA , et al. Design of four component T=4 tetrahedral, octahedral, and icosahedral protein nanocages through programmed symmetry breaking. bioRxiv. 2023;: 2023.06.16.545341. · DOI
  12. Dowling QM , Park Y-J , Gerstenmaier N , Yang EC , Wargacki A , Hsia Y , et al. Hierarchical design of pseudosymmetric protein nanoparticles. bioRxiv. 2023;: 2023.06.16.545393. · DOI
  13. Watson JL , Juergens D , Bennett NR , Trippe BL , Yim J , Eisenach HE , et al. Broadly applicable and accurate protein design by integrating structure prediction networks and diffusion generative models. bioRxiv. 2022;: 2022.12.09.519842. · DOI · Paper page
  14. 2023, Top-down design of protein architectures with reinforcement learning, Science, 380, 266, 10.1126/science.adf6591 · DOI
  15. Ingraham J , Baranov M , Costello Z , Frappier V , Ismail A , Tie S et al. Illuminating protein space with a programmable generative model. bioRxiv. 2022;: 2022.12.01.518682. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Ingraham J , Garg VK , Barzilay R , Jaakkola T. Generative models for graph-based protein design. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2019/file/f3a4ff4839c56a5f460c88cce3666a2b-Paper.pdf (accessed 14 Aug2023).
  17. Verkuil R , Kabeli O , Du Y , Wicky BIM , Milles LF , Dauparas J et al. Language models generalize beyond natural proteins. bioRxiv. 2022;: 2022.12.21.521521. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Anand N , Eguchi R , Mathews II , Perez CP , Derry A , Altman RB et al. Protein sequence design with a learned potential. Nat Commun 2022; 13: 746. · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1126/science.add2187 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1038/nature25157 · DOI
  21. 10.1021/jacs.8b06442 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/s41467-020-19112-1 · DOI
  23. 10.1038/nature20607 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.cell.2023.06.013 · DOI
  25. 10.1126/science.aav7532 · DOI
  26. 10.1126/science.abd9994 · DOI
  27. 10.1073/pnas.1718825115 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/s41467-019-09836-0 · DOI
  29. Castells-Graells R , Meador K , Arbing MA , Sawaya MR , Gee M , Cascio D et al. Rigidified Scaffolds for 3 Angstrom Resolution Cryo-EM of Small Therapeutic Protein Targets. bioRxiv. 2022;: 2022.09.18.508009. · DOI
  30. 2020, Designed Protein Cages as Scaffolds for Building Multienzyme Materials, ACS Synth Biol, 9, 381, 10.1021/acssynbio.9b00407 · DOI
  31. 2023, Engineered repeat proteins as scaffolds to assemble multi-enzyme systems for efficient cell-free biosynthesis, Nat Commun, 14, 2587, 10.1038/s41467-023-38304-z · DOI
  32. 10.1021/acsnano.8b02805 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/s41467-019-12080-1 · DOI
  34. 10.7554/eLife.57659 · DOI
  35. 2021, Overcoming Symmetry Mismatch in Vaccine Nanoassembly through Spontaneous Amidation, Angew Chem Int Ed Engl, 60, 321, 10.1002/anie.202009663 · DOI
  36. 10.1126/science.abf6840 · DOI
  37. 2021, Elicitation of broadly protective sarbecovirus immunity by receptor-binding domain nanoparticle vaccines, Cell, 184, 5432, 10.1016/j.cell.2021.09.015 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.046 · DOI
  39. 2021, Quadrivalent influenza nanoparticle vaccines induce broad protection, Nature, 592, 623, 10.1038/s41586-021-03365-x · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.043 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Song JY , Choi WS , Heo JY , Lee JS , Jung DS , Kim S-W et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein nanoparticle vaccine (GBP510) adjuvanted with AS03: A randomised, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded phase 1/2 trial. EClinicalMedicine 2022; 51: 101569. · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102140 · DOI
  43. 10.1101/SQB.1962.027.001.005 · DOI
  44. 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1068 · DOI
  45. 10.1074/mcp.M900620-MCP200 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1016/j.tim.2010.11.003 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.abb.2012.10.015 · DOI
  48. 2019, Polymorphic assembly of virus-capsid proteins around DNA and the cellular uptake of the resulting particles, J Control Release, 307, 342, 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.06.019 · DOI
  49. Biela AP , Naskalska A , Fatehi F , Twarock R , Heddle JG . Programmable polymorphism of a virus-like particle. Commun Mater 2022; 3: 7. · DOI
  50. Seitz I , Kumpula E-P , Anaya-Plaza E , Cornelissen JJL , Linko V , Huiskonen JT et al. DNA origami directed virus capsid polymorphism. bioRxiv. 2022;: 2022.11.07.515152. · DOI
  51. 10.1038/s41594-019-0292-0 · DOI
  52. 10.1126/sciadv.aba8397 · DOI
  53. 10.1073/pnas.0803841105 · DOI
  54. 10.1126/science.1233936 · DOI
  55. 10.1073/pnas.1706825114 · DOI
  56. 10.1126/science.abg2822 · DOI
  57. 10.1073/pnas.041614998 · DOI
  58. 10.1038/nchem.2107 · DOI
  59. 10.1021/jacs.5b03593 · DOI
  60. 10.1126/science.1219351 · DOI
  61. 10.1073/pnas.2214556120 · DOI
  62. 2021, Design of multi-scale protein complexes by hierarchical building block fusion, Nat Commun, 12, 2294, 10.1038/s41467-021-22276-z · DOI
  63. 10.1038/nsb1194-789 · DOI
  64. 2020, Better together: Elements of successful scientific software development in a distributed collaborative community, PLoS Comput Biol, 16, e1007507, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007507 · DOI
  65. Guo H-B , Perminov A , Bekele S , Kedziora G , Farajollahi S , Varaljay V et al. AlphaFold2 models indicate that protein sequence determines both structure and dynamics. Sci Rep 2022; 12: 10696. · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.3390/ijms23094591 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 2022, High-Resolution Native Mass Spectrometry, Chem Rev, 122, 7269, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00212 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 2020, Resolving heterogeneous macromolecular assemblies by Orbitrap-based single-particle charge detection mass spectrometry, Nat Methods, 17, 395, 10.1038/s41592-020-0770-7 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 2023, Orbitrap-Based Mass and Charge Analysis of Single Molecules, Acc Chem Res, 56, 1458, 10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00079 · DOI
  70. He Y , Mao C . Balancing flexibility and stress in DNA nanostructures. Chem Commun 2006;: 968–969. · DOI
  71. 2017, Gigadalton-scale shape-programmable DNA assemblies, Nature, 552, 78, 10.1038/nature24651 · DOI
  72. 10.1016/S0959-440X(00)00189-5 · DOI
  73. Hamilton JR , Tsuchida CA , Nguyen DN , Shy BR , McGarrigle ER , Sandoval Espinoza CR et al. Targeted delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 and transgenes enables complex immune cell engineering. Cell Rep 2021; 35: 109207. · DOI
  74. 10.1017/S0033583507004635 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1038/nmeth.1353 · DOI
  76. 10.1107/S0021889812048698 · DOI
  77. 10.1007/978-1-62703-691-7_18 · DOI
  78. 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.07.020 · DOI
  79. 10.1093/nar/gkw389 · DOI
  80. 10.1073/pnas.1404575111 · DOI
  81. 10.1002/pro.3967 · DOI
  82. 10.1038/nmeth.4193 · DOI
  83. 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.11.003 · DOI
  84. 10.1038/nmeth.4169 · DOI · Paper page
  85. 10.7554/eLife.42166 · DOI
  86. 10.1126/science.aar5839 · DOI
  87. 2020, ff19SB: Amino-Acid-Specific Protein Backbone Parameters Trained against Quantum Mechanics Energy Surfaces in Solution, J Chem Theory Comput, 16, 528, 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00591 · DOI
  88. Roe DR , Brooks BR . A protocol for preparing explicitly solvated systems for stable molecular dynamics simulations. J Chem Phys 2020; 153: 054123. · DOI
  89. 10.1107/S0907444911049791 · DOI
  90. 10.1038/nmeth.3286 · DOI
  91. 10.7554/eLife.17219 · DOI · Paper page
  92. 2010, CaGe: a virtual environment for studying some special classes of plane graphs: an update, MATCH-COMMUNICATIONS IN MATHEMATICAL AND IN COMPUTER CHEMISTRY, 63, 533

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Khmelinskaia, A., Bethel, N. P., Fatehi, F., Antanasijevic, A., Borst, A. J., Lai, S.-H., Wang, J. Y. (., Mallik, B. B., Miranda, M. C., Watkins, A. M., Ogohara, C., Caldwell, S., Wu, M., Heck, A. J. R., Veesler, D., Ward, A. B., Baker, D., Twarock, R., & King, N. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of York (GB)
  • Scripps Research Institute (US)
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Genentech (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Khmelinskaia, Alena
  • King, Neil P.
Venue
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2023-10-19
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
1050-1060
ISSN
1545-9985 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407988683
Cited by
18
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1629214, P30 GM124169)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (GT11817)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (180009, P30 GM124169, GM124169)
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-002916, INV-010680)
  • amfAR, The Foundation for AIDS Research (110182-69-RKVA)
  • University of Washington
  • Wellcome Trust (110145, 110146, DP1AI158186)
  • Open Philanthropy Project
  • Australian Government
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB1032,)
  • École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (SPI.2017.028, ENPPS.LIFT.019.001)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/R023204/1)
  • Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P30GM124169)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (DP1AI158186, P01AI167966, 75N93022C00036, U54AI170856)
  • Basic Energy Sciences
  • Biological and Environmental Research (P30 GM124169)
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials
Keywords
protein self-assembly, structural flexibility, structural diversity, protein architecture, native mass spectrometry, molecular dynamics simulation, protein design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review