The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Degradome analysis to identify direct protein substrates of small-molecule degraders
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.chembiol.2024.10.007 · Paper page
Abstract
Targeted protein degradation (TPD) has emerged as a powerful strategy to selectively eliminate cellular proteins using small-molecule degraders, offering therapeutic promise for targeting proteins that are otherwise undruggable. However, a remaining challenge is to unambiguously identify primary TPD targets that are distinct from secondary downstream effects in the proteome. Here we introduce an approach that combines stable isotope labeling and click-chemistry for selective quantification of protein degradation by mass spectrometry, excluding confounding effects of altered transcription and translation induced by target depletion. We show that the approach efficiently operates at the time scale of TPD (hours) and we demonstrate its utility by analyzing the Cyclin K degraders dCeMM2 and dCeMM4, which induce widespread transcriptional downregulation, and the GSPT1 degrader CC-885, an inhibitor of protein translation. Additionally, we apply it to characterize compound 1, a previously uncharacterized degrader, and identify the zinc-finger protein FIZ1 as a degraded target.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566 · cited 1×
“SILAC specifications, the match-between-runs option and intensity-based absolute quantification (iBAQ, Schwanhäusser et al., 2011) were activated in all searches.”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- 10.1038/ncomms15398 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2545-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41573-021-00371-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-023-43919-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1074/mcp.M114.044305 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41589-019-0362-y · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41571-023-00736-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.1511 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.038 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.2356 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.crchbi.2021.100018 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41589-020-0469-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/jacs.2c10784 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cbpa.2019.11.012 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41589-022-00971-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1042/BCJ20160719 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1177319 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.chembiol.2021.04.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1244851 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/pr500392m · DOI
- 10.1074/mcp.M111.009183 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1244917 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1186/1471-2199-9-87 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.exer.2006.10.009 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature18611 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41589-020-0594-x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.015 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41573-022-00409-3 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41587-022-01539-0 · DOI
- 10.1093/hmg/ddg035 · DOI
- 10.1038/d41573-021-00052-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acschembio.3c00598 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chembiol.2023.01.004 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkab1038 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00938 · DOI
- 10.1021/acschembio.0c00520 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkv007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.tips.2023.08.007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.030 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.chembiol.2021.03.007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.09.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1189/jlb.1109748 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.274.30.21478 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41392-022-00966-4 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Jochem, M., Schrempf, A., Wagner, L.-M., Cisneros, J., Ng, A., Winter, G. E., & Krijgsveld, J.
- Affiliations
- German Cancer Research Center (DE)
- Austrian Academy of Sciences (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Krijgsveld, Jeroen
- Venue
- Cell chemical biology
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2024-01-28
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 192-200.e6
- ISSN
- 2451-9448 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4404299406
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 3.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Cell chemical biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Pfizer
- European Commission (HORIZON2020, 851478)
- Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (P7909, P32125)
- Austrian Science Fund (P 32125, P7909)
- Deutsche Krebshilfe (70114190)
- European Research Council
- Horizon 2020
- HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council (851478)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Keywords
- targeted protein degradation, small-molecule degraders, GSPT1, zinc finger proteins, transcriptional downregulation, protein synthesis inhibition, undruggable proteins
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Mass Spectrometry, Substrate Specificity, Proteomics, Small Molecule Libraries, Proteolysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review