PreprintCited by 4Genomics and Chromatin DynamicsSperm and Testicular FunctionEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A germline PAF1 paralog complex ensures cell type-specific gene expression

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1101/gad.351930.124 · Paper page

Abstract

Animal germline development and fertility rely on paralogs of general transcription factors that recruit RNA polymerase II to ensure cell type-specific gene expression. It remains unclear whether gene expression processes downstream of such paralog-based transcription is distinct from that of canonical RNA polymerase II genes. In Drosophila , the testis-specific TBP-associated factors (tTAFs) activate over a thousand spermatocyte-specific gene promoters to enable meiosis and germ cell differentiation. Here, we show that efficient termination of tTAF-activated transcription relies on testis-specific paralogs of canonical Polymerase Associated Factor 1 Complex (PAF1C) proteins, which form a testis-specific PAF1C (tPAF). Consequently, tPAF mutants cause aberrant expression of hundreds of downstream genes due to read-in transcription. Furthermore, tPAF facilitates expression of Y-linked male fertility factor genes, and thus broadly maintains spermatocyte-specific gene expression. Consistently, tPAF is required for the segregation of meiotic chromosomes and male fertility. Supported by comparative in vivo protein interaction assays, we provide a mechanistic model for the functional divergence of tPAF and PAF1C and for transcription termination as a developmentally regulated process required for cell type-specific gene expression.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2024.05.02.592153

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 86

  1. 10.1038/nrg.2016.127 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/nrm.2017.130 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.005 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/nature23482 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1186/2045-3701-1-23 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/s41467-020-20239-4 · DOI
  7. 10.1126/science.1059188 · DOI
  8. 10.1073/pnas.1317034110 · DOI
  9. 10.1126/science.290.5500.2312 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.gde.2010.06.004 · DOI
  11. 10.1126/science.1061935 · DOI
  12. 10.1074/jbc.275.1.122 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.07.007 · DOI
  14. 10.1101/gad.328690.119 · DOI
  15. 10.1093/nar/gkab606 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.07.018 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.7554/eLife.78695 · DOI
  18. 10.1038/hdy.2009.23 · DOI
  19. 10.7554/eLife.47999 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.03.022 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/s41594-019-0270-6 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/s41556-019-0396-0 · DOI
  23. 10.1101/gad.335331.119 · DOI
  24. 10.1186/1471-2164-15-39 · DOI
  25. 10.1098/rsob.140145 · DOI
  26. 10.1242/bio.022467 · DOI
  27. 10.1101/gad.1516607 · DOI
  28. 10.1242/dev.01314 · DOI
  29. 10.1126/science.1118101 · DOI
  30. 10.1242/dev.122.4.1331 · DOI
  31. 10.7554/eLife.80067 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.tibs.2017.08.003 · DOI
  33. 10.1101/gad.869101 · DOI
  34. 10.5772/30363 · DOI
  35. 10.1242/jcs.107.12.3521 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/nar/gkt819 · DOI
  37. 10.1261/rna.7231505 · DOI
  38. 10.1002/wrna.1795 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1101/gad.1292105 · DOI
  40. 10.1128/MCB.22.20.6979-6992.2002 · DOI
  41. 10.1128/MCB.22.7.1971-1980.2002 · DOI
  42. 10.1371/journal.pone.0108267 · DOI
  43. 10.1093/genetics/45.3.257 · DOI
  44. 10.1093/genetics/98.3.529 · DOI
  45. 10.1007/BF00285858 · DOI
  46. 10.1534/genetics.118.301765 · DOI
  47. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008028 · DOI
  48. 10.1186/s13072-018-0183-3 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.07.042 · DOI
  50. 10.1101/gad.1296305 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.11.002 · DOI
  52. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005794 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2022.04.010 · DOI
  54. 10.1101/gr.776503 · DOI
  55. 10.1038/nsmb.1903 · DOI
  56. 10.1126/science.aad2338 · DOI
  57. 10.1534/genetics.119.302262 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90448-4 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90447-2 · DOI
  60. 10.1101/gad.7.8.1535 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.04.031 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.04.030 · DOI
  63. 10.1038/s41467-022-32305-0 · DOI
  64. 10.1101/2024.01.05.574404 · DOI
  65. 10.1126/science.aal3096 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1093/nar/gkz1050 · DOI
  67. 10.1093/genetics/iyac035 · DOI
  68. 10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1242/JCS.109.12.2779 · DOI
  70. 10.1038/nmeth.2019 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.1038/nmeth.4256 · DOI
  72. 10.1038/nmeth1113 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1038/s41467-023-40129-9 · DOI
  74. 10.1021/ac0341261 · DOI
  75. 10.1016/j.mcpro.2021.100077 · DOI
  76. 10.1038/s41594-020-0437-1 · DOI · Paper page
  77. 10.1107/S0907444910007493 · DOI · Paper page
  78. 10.1371/journal.pone.0042882 · DOI
  79. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 10.1038/nmeth.4197 · DOI · Paper page
  81. 10.1186/s12859-018-2246-7 · DOI
  82. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 · DOI · Paper page
  83. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 · DOI · Paper page
  84. 10.1016/j.xpro.2024.102960 · DOI
  85. 10.21105/joss.01686 · DOI · Paper page
  86. 10.1038/nature12962 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Vilstrup, A. P., Gupta, A., Rasmussen, A. J., Ebert, A., Riedelbauch, S., Lukassen, M. V., Hayashi, R., & Andersen, P.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • Technical University of Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Andersen, Peter
Venue
Genes & Development
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2024-05-02
Volume
38
Issue
17-20
Pages
866-886
ISSN
0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402903527
Cited by
4
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Genes & Development (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Aarhus Universitet
  • Marie Curie
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF18OC0030954)
  • Australian Research Council (DP210102385)
  • Aarhus Institute of Advanced Studies, Aarhus Universitet
  • H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
Paf1 complex, transcription termination, TATA-binding protein-associated factors, meiosis, male fertility, meiotic chromosome segregation, germ cell development, Drosophila, RNA polymerase II
MeSH terms
Animals, Drosophila melanogaster, Fertility, Germ Cells, Male, Meiosis, Nuclear Proteins, Spermatocytes, Testis, Transcription Factors, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Drosophila Proteins, Multiprotein Complexes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review