The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CRISPR-Cas12a REC2 – NUC interactions drive target-strand cleavage and constrain trans cleavage
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1093/nar/gkaf988 · Paper page
Abstract
CRISPR-Cas12a effects RNA-guided cleavage of dsDNA in cis , after which it remains catalytically active and non-specifically cleaves ssDNA in trans . Native host-defence by Cas12a employs cis cleavage, which can be repurposed for the genome editing of other organisms, and trans cleavage can be used for in vitro DNA detection. Cas12a orthologues have high structural similarity and a conserved mechanism of DNA cleavage, yet highly different efficacies when applied for genome editing or DNA detection. By comparing three well characterised Cas12a orthologues (FnCas12a, LbCas12a, and AsCas12a), we sought to determine what drives their different cis and trans cleavage, and how this relates to their applied function. We integrated in vitro DNA cleavage kinetics with molecular dynamics simulations, plasmid interference in E. coli , and genome editing in human cell lines. We report large differences in cis cleavage kinetics between orthologues, which may be driven by dynamic REC2-NUC interactions. We generated and tested REC2 and NUC mutants, including a hitherto unstudied ‘NUC loop’, integrity of which is critical for the function of Cas12 orthologues. In total, our in vitro, in vivo, and in silico survey of Cas12a orthologues highlights key properties that drive their function in biotechnology applications. Graphical abstract:
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 68
- 10.1126/science.1138140 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nrmicro3569 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature17945 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.03.016 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.038 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41587-018-0011-0 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.3609 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41422-018-0022-x · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aar6245 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/600890 · DOI
- 2021, CRISPR-based diagnostics. Nat, Biomed. Eng, 5, 643
- 2023, Recent progress in aptamer and CRISPR-Cas12a based systems for non-nucleic target detection, Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem, 0, 1
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.11.021 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.045 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.06.035 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature17944 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2024.06.007 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1718686115 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.06.043 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkac767 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkab286 · DOI
- 10.1002/1873-3468.14051 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-024-45762-6 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.55143 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41589-022-01082-8 · DOI
- 10.3390/GENES10020169 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2113747118 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00929 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.isci.2019.08.005 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-018-05245-x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s42003-022-04068-3 · DOI
- 1999, Protein identification and analysis tools in the ExPASy server, Methods Mol. Biol. Clifton NJ, 112, 531
- 10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z · DOI
- 10.1002/psp4.12757 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkaa477 · DOI
- 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.340140216 · DOI
- 10.1093/NAR/GKAB1061 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nbt.3620 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkx783 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.3900 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/pbi.13275 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41587-019-0032-3 · DOI
- 10.1021/ACS.JCTC.9B00591/SUPPL_FILE/CT9B00591_SI_002.ZIP · DOI
- 10.1038/nmeth.3658 · DOI
- 10.1021/ct100481h · DOI
- 2011, Refinement of the Cornell, Nucleic Acids Force Field Based on Reference Quantum Chemical Calculations of Glycosidic Torsion Profiles. J. Chem. Theory Comput, 7, 2886
- 10.1063/1.445869 · DOI
- 10.1021/ct400146w · DOI
- 10.1038/s41929-022-00848-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/0021-9991(77)90098-5 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.434317 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.448118 · DOI
- 10.21105/joss.03021 · DOI · Paper page
- Connors, K.A. (1990) Chemical Kinetics: The Study of Reaction Rates in Solution Wiley.
- 10.1089/crispr.2020.0086 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/9.24.6805 · DOI
- 10.1101/2021.06.18.448962 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bios.2024.116859 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-020-18615-1 · DOI
- Analysis of Protein Stability and Ligand Interactions by Thermal Shift Assay - Huynh - 2015 - Current Protocols in Protein Science - Wiley Online Library.
- Sun, R. , Zhao, Y. , Wang, W. , Liu, J.-J.G. and Chen, C . Nonspecific interactions between Cas12a and dsDNA located downstream of the PAM mediate target search and assist AsCas12a for DNA cleavage. Chem. Sci., 14, 3839–3851. · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gkae1192 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.RA120.012933 · DOI
- 10.1101/2022.05.30.494023 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002065 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41564-019-0382-0 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Newman, A., Saha, A., Starrs, L., Arantes, P. R., Palermo, G., & Burgio, G.
- Affiliations
- Australian National University (AU)
- University of California, Riverside (US)
- The Shine-Dalgarno Centre for RNA Innovation, Division of Genome Sciences and Cancer, The John Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia
- Venue
- Nucleic Acids Research
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2025-03-25
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 18
- ISSN
- 0305-1048 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12507515
- OpenAlex
- W4414969377
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 4.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nucleic Acids Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2137603, MCB160059, 2138259, 2138296, 2138307, BIO230007, 2138286, 2144823)
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (FG-2023-20431)
- Camille and Henry Dreyfus Foundation (TC-24-063)
- Australian Government
- National Institutes of Health (2138307, 2138286, 2138296, 2137603, 2138259)
- Medical Research Council
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM141329)
- Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (#2138286, #2138296, 2138259, #2138307, 2137603)
- Division of Chemistry (2138296, 2138307, 2137603, 2138259, 2138286)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Keywords
- CRISPR/Cas12a, trans-cleavage, cis-cleavage, LbCas12a, AsCas12a, DNA cleavage kinetics, genome editing, DNA detection, molecular dynamics simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review