CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 322

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structural Basis for the Canonical and Non-canonical PAM Recognition by CRISPR-Cpf1

Yamano, Takashi, Zetsche, Bernd, Ishitani, Ryuichiro, Zhang, Feng, Nishimasu, Hiroshi, Nureki, Osamu·2017·Molecular Cell
DOI 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.06.035PMC PMC5957536
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.06.035

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LbCpf1 and AsCpf1 have higher targeting specificity in mammalian cells than SpCas9, as measured through Digenome-Seq analysis.

    “Cas12a (type-V Cpf1) from Lachnospiraceae bacterium ND2006 (LbCpf1) and Acidaminococcus sp. BV3L6 (AsCpf1) have many differences from SpCas9, but they are gaining popularity because they have higher targeting specificity in mammalian cells, as measured through Digenome-Seq analysis [74,75].”

    From Viral Delivery Systems for CRISPR (2019) · cites this paper as [75]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Adams, 2010, PHENIX: A comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr., 66, 213, 10.1107/S0907444909052925 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Anders, 2014, Structural basis of PAM-dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease, Nature, 513, 569, 10.1038/nature13579 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Barrangou, 2016, Applications of CRISPR technologies in research and beyond, Nat. Biotechnol., 34, 933, 10.1038/nbt.3659 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Dong, 2016, The crystal structure of Cpf1 in complex with CRISPR RNA, Nature, 532, 522, 10.1038/nature17944 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Evans, 2013, How good are my data and what is the resolution?, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr., 69, 1204, 10.1107/S0907444913000061 · DOI
  6. Fonfara, 2014, Phylogeny of Cas9 determines functional exchangeability of dual-RNA and Cas9 among orthologous type II CRISPR-Cas systems, Nucleic Acids Res., 42, 2577, 10.1093/nar/gkt1074 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Fonfara, 2016, The CRISPR-associated DNA-cleaving enzyme Cpf1 also processes precursor CRISPR RNA, Nature, 532, 517, 10.1038/nature17945 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Gao, 2016, Type V CRISPR-Cas Cpf1 endonuclease employs a unique mechanism for crRNA-mediated target DNA recognition, Cell Res., 26, 901, 10.1038/cr.2016.88 · DOI
  9. Gao, 2017, Engineered Cpf1 variants with altered PAM specificities, Nat. Biotechnol., 10.1038/nbt.3900 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Garneau, 2010, The CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system cleaves bacteriophage and plasmid DNA, Nature, 468, 67, 10.1038/nature09523 · DOI
  11. Hirano, 2016, Structure and engineering of Francisella novicida Cas9, Cell, 164, 950, 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.039 · DOI
  12. Hur, 2016, Targeted mutagenesis in mice by electroporation of Cpf1 ribonucleoproteins, Nat. Biotechnol., 34, 807, 10.1038/nbt.3596 · DOI
  13. Jiang, 2015, A Cas9-guide RNA complex preorganized for target DNA recognition, Science, 348, 1477, 10.1126/science.aab1452 · DOI
  14. Karvelis, 2015, Rapid characterization of CRISPR-Cas9 protospacer adjacent motif sequence elements, Genome Biol., 16, 253, 10.1186/s13059-015-0818-7 · DOI
  15. Kim, 2016, Generation of knockout mice by Cpf1-mediated gene targeting, Nat. Biotechnol., 34, 808, 10.1038/nbt.3614 · DOI
  16. Kim, 2016, Genome-wide analysis reveals specificities of Cpf1 endonucleases in human cells, Nat. Biotechnol., 34, 863, 10.1038/nbt.3609 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Kleinstiver, 2016, Genome-wide specificities of CRISPR-Cas Cpf1 nucleases in human cells, Nat. Biotechnol., 34, 869, 10.1038/nbt.3620 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Komor, 2017, CRISPR-based technologies for the manipulation of eukaryotic genomes, Cell, 168, 20, 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.044 · DOI
  19. Liu, 2017, C2c1-sgRNA complex structure reveals RNA-guided DNA cleavage mechanism, Mol. Cell, 65, 310, 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.11.040 · DOI
  20. Makarova, 2015, An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 13, 722, 10.1038/nrmicro3569 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Marraffini, 2015, CRISPR-Cas immunity in prokaryotes, Nature, 526, 55, 10.1038/nature15386 · DOI
  22. Mohanraju, 2016, Diverse evolutionary roots and mechanistic variations of the CRISPR-Cas systems, Science, 353, aad5147, 10.1126/science.aad5147 · DOI
  23. Nishimasu, 2017, Structures and mechanisms of CRISPR RNA-guided effector nucleases, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 43, 68, 10.1016/j.sbi.2016.11.013 · DOI
  24. Nishimasu, 2015, Crystal structure of Staphylococcus aureus Cas9, Cell, 162, 1113, 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.007 · DOI
  25. Shmakov, 2015, Discovery and functional characterization of diverse class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems, Mol. Cell, 60, 385, 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.008 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Shmakov, 2017, Diversity and evolution of class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 15, 169, 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.184 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Swarts, 2017, Structural basis for guide RNA processing and seed-dependent DNA targeting by CRISPR-Cas12a, Mol. Cell, 66, 221, 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.03.016 · DOI
  28. Tang, 2017, A CRISPR-Cpf1 system for efficient genome editing and transcriptional repression in plants, Nat Plants, 3, 17018, 10.1038/nplants.2017.18 · DOI
  29. Vagin, 2010, Molecular replacement with MOLREP, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol. Crystallogr., 66, 22, 10.1107/S0907444909042589 · DOI
  30. Waterman, 2013, The DIALS framework for integration software, CCP4 Newsletter, 49, 16
  31. Wright, 2016, Biology and applications of CRISPR systems: Harnessing Nature’s toolbox for genome engineering, Cell, 164, 29, 10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.035 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Yamada, 2017, Crystal structure of the minimal Cas9 from Campylobacter jejuni reveals the molecular diversity in the CRISPR-Cas9 systems, Mol. Cell, 65, 1109, 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.02.007 · DOI
  33. Yamano, 2016, Crystal structure of Cpf1 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA, Cell, 165, 949, 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.003 · DOI
  34. Yang, 2016, PAM-dependent target DNA recognition and cleavage by C2c1 CRISPR-Cas endonuclease, Cell, 167, 1814, 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.053 · DOI
  35. Zetsche, 2015, Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system, Cell, 163, 759, 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.038 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Zetsche, 2017, Multiplex gene editing by CRISPR-Cpf1 using a single crRNA array, Nat. Biotechnol., 35, 31, 10.1038/nbt.3737 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yamano, T., Zetsche, B., Ishitani, R., Zhang, F., Nishimasu, H., & Nureki, O.
Venue
Molecular Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
633-645.e3
ISSN
1097-2765
DOI
10.1016/j.molcel.2017.06.035
PMC
PMC5957536
Cited by
322
References
9
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15H01463, 26291010)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  • National Institute of Mental Health (1R01-MH110049, 5DP1-MH100706)
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (5R01DK097768-03)
  • Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology (JPMJPR13L8)
  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
  • Vallee Foundation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review