PreprintCited by 23Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionComputational Drug Discovery Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Atomic resolution ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins with Alphafold

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s41467-026-69172-y · Paper page

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered proteins are ubiquitous in biological systems and play essential roles in a wide range of biological processes and diseases. Despite recent advances in high-resolution structural biology techniques and breakthroughs in deep learning-based protein structure prediction, accurately determining structural ensembles of IDPs at atomic resolution remains a major challenge. Here we introduce bAIes, a Bayesian framework that integrates AlphaFold2 predictions with physico-chemical molecular mechanics force fields to generate accurate atomic-resolution ensembles of IDPs. We show that bAIes produces structural ensembles that match a wide range of high- and low-resolution experimental data across diverse systems, achieving accuracy comparable to atomistic molecular dynamics simulations but at a fraction of their computational cost. Furthermore, bAIes outperforms state-of-the-art IDP models based on coarse-grained potentials as well as deep-learning approaches. Our findings pave the way for integrating structural information from modern deep-learning approaches with molecular simulations, advancing ensemble-based understanding of disordered proteins.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2025.06.18.660298

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 99

  1. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.02.002 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/s41580-023-00673-0 · DOI
  3. 10.1021/cr400688u · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.crstbi.2024.100138 · DOI
  5. 10.1021/jacs.0c02088 · DOI
  6. 10.1021/jacs.1c06264 · DOI
  7. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005941 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/s43588-021-00155-3 · DOI
  9. 10.12688/openreseurope.14967.2 · DOI
  10. 2023, Modeling Concentration-dependent Phase Separation Processes Involving Peptides and RNA via Residue-Based Coarse-Graining, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 19, 669, 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00856 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/pro.5172 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1038/s41592-023-02159-5 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/s41586-023-07004-5 · DOI
  14. 2025, Sequence-Based Prediction of Intermolecular Interactions Driven by Disordered Regions, Science, 388, eadq8381, 10.1126/science.adq8381 · DOI
  15. 2023, Direct generation of protein conformational ensembles via machine learning, Nature Communications, 14, 774, 10.1038/s41467-023-36443-x · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012144 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1101/2025.02.14.638373 · DOI
  18. Mollica, L. ; Bessa, L. M. ; Hanoulle, X. ; Jensen, M. R. ; Blackledge, M. ; Schneider, R. Binding Mechanisms of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: Theory, Simulation, and Experiment. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences 2016 3. · DOI
  19. 10.1007/s00018-017-2563-4 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.drudis.2018.09.017 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1101/2025.01.23.634614 · DOI
  22. 10.1101/2024.10.04.616700 · DOI
  23. 10.1073/pnas.1800690115 · DOI
  24. 10.1002/jcc.21005 · DOI
  25. 2019, Improvements to the ABSINTH Force Field for Proteins Based on Experimentally Derived Amino Acid Specific Backbone Conformational Statistics, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 15, 1367, 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00573 · DOI
  26. 10.1093/nar/gkt960 · DOI
  27. 10.1093/nar/gkaa1021 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1016/j.sbi.2025.103028 · DOI
  29. 10.1038/S41586-024-07487-W · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1073/pnas.2304302120 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1073/pnas.2406407121 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.sbi.2024.102958 · DOI
  35. 2025, AlphaFold prediction of structural ensembles of disordered proteins, Nature Communications, 16, 1632, 10.1038/s41467-025-56572-9 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Pajkos, M. ; Clerc, I. ; Zanon, C. ; Bernadó, P. ; Cortés, J. AFflecto: A web server to generate conformational ensembles of flexible proteins from AlphaFold models. Journal of Molecular Biology 2025 169003. · DOI
  37. 10.1101/2024.12.05.626885 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 2025, ExEnDiff: An Experiment-Guided Diffusion Model for Protein Conformational Ensemble Generation, PRX Life, 3, 023013, 10.1103/PRXLife.3.023013 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1042/BST20120149 · DOI
  40. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c01023 · DOI
  41. 10.1073/pnas.0506202102 · DOI
  42. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts172 · DOI
  43. Jeffreys, S. H. ; Jeffreys, S. H. The Theory of Probability ; Oxford University Press, 1998. · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.cpc.2013.09.018 · DOI
  45. 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b01259 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.str.2014.03.012 · DOI
  47. 2016, Alpha-synuclein structure, functions, and interactions, Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 21, 29
  48. 10.1021/ja044834j · DOI
  49. 10.1073/pnas.0407146102 · DOI
  50. 10.1128/mbio.00226–20 · DOI
  51. 10.1021/bi0512795 · DOI
  52. 10.1038/nmeth.4067 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.03.051 · DOI
  54. 2008, Anton, a special-purpose machine for molecular dynamics simulation, Commun. ACM, 51, 91, 10.1145/1364782.1364802 · DOI
  55. 10.1038/s41594-023-01148-8 · DOI
  56. 10.1126/sciadv.abc3786 · DOI
  57. 10.1101/2025.06.25.661454 · DOI
  58. 10.1126/sciadv.1501177 · DOI
  59. 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1021/ja101645g · DOI
  61. 10.1038/s42254-020-0153-0 · DOI
  62. 10.1101/2025.06.14.659707 · DOI
  63. 10.48550/arXiv.2505.01919 · DOI
  64. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu739 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 2020, MGnify: The Microbiome Analysis Resource in 2020, Nucleic Acids Research, 48, D570
  66. 10.1186/s12859-019-3019-7 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1038/nmeth.1818 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1093/nar/gkw1081 · DOI
  69. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1002/prot.22711 · DOI
  71. 10.1021/ja036959e · DOI
  72. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000763 · DOI
  73. 10.1007/s10858-015-9971-2 · DOI
  74. 10.1002/bip.360221211 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.020603 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 · DOI · Paper page
  77. 10.1126/science.1110428 · DOI
  78. 2020, Determination of Protein Structural Ensembles by Hybrid-Resolution SAXS Restrained Molecular Dynamics, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 16, 2825, 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b01181 · DOI
  79. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012180 · DOI
  80. 10.1073/pnas.1314045110 · DOI
  81. 10.1007/s10822-016-9977-1 · DOI
  82. 10.1063/1.2408420 · DOI
  83. 2024, OpenMM 8: Molecular Dynamics Simulation with Machine Learning Potentials, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 128, 109, 10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c06662 · DOI
  84. 10.1002/jcc.20906 · DOI
  85. 2015, GROMACS: High performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers, SoftwareX, 1-2, 19, 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
  86. Visani, G. M. ; Galvin, W. ; Pun, M. ; Nourmohammad, A. H-Packer: Holographic Rotationally Equivariant Convolutional Neural Network for Protein Side-Chain Packing. Proceedings of the 18th Machine Learning in Computational Biology meeting. 2024; pp 230–249.
  87. 10.1007/s10858-010-9433-9 · DOI
  88. 10.1021/ja070324o · DOI
  89. 10.1002/cphc.201402704 · DOI
  90. 10.1039/c0cp01865a · DOI
  91. 2008, NMR: prediction of molecular alignment from structure using the PALES software, Nature Protocols, 3, 679, 10.1038/nprot.2008.36 · DOI
  92. 10.1021/ja802220c · DOI
  93. 10.1107/S2059798317005745 · DOI
  94. 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.10.003 · DOI
  95. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007870 · DOI
  96. 10.3390/computation6010015 · DOI
  97. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx529 · DOI
  98. 10.1038/s41592-019-0506-8 · DOI
  99. 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.05.058 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Schnapka, V., Morozova, T. I., Sen, S., & Bonomi, M.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • École Normale Supérieure de Lyon (FR)
Corresponding author
Bonomi, Massimiliano
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2025-06-21
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
2399
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7127941162
Cited by
23
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 5
FWCI
36.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • European Commission (101086685)
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (101086685 – bAIes)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
intrinsically disordered proteins, structural ensembles, AlphaFold2, molecular mechanics force field, bays, protein structure prediction, coarse-grained potentials
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Bayes Theorem, Protein Conformation, Protein Folding, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review