The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Signaling Pathways that Regulate Cell Division
Open accessAbstract
Cell division requires careful orchestration of three major events: entry into mitosis, chromosomal segregation, and cytokinesis.Signaling within and between the molecules that control these events allows for their coordination via checkpoints, a specific class of signaling pathways that ensure the dependency of cell-cycle events on the successful completion of preceding events.Multiple positive-and negative-feedback loops ensure that a cell is fully committed to division and that the events occur in the proper order.Unlike other signaling pathways, which integrate external inputs to decide whether to execute a given process, signaling at cell division is largely dedicated to completing a decision made in G1 phase-to initiate and complete a round of mitotic cell division.Instead of deciding if the events of cell division will take place, these signaling pathways entrain these events to the activation of the cell-cycle kinase cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) and provide the opportunity for checkpoint proteins to arrest cell division if things go wrong.Outline 1 Introduction 2 CDK1 and entry into mitosis 3 Regulation of the G2/M transition 4 Checkpoint regulation of the G2/M transition 5 The DNA damage and replication checkpoints 6 The DNA damage checkpoint triggered by DSBs 7 The DNA replication checkpoint triggered by stalled replication forks 8 Chk1 and Chk2 target Cdc25 9 The MAPK-dependent stress checkpoint 10 Resolution of G2 checkpoint arrests 11 Regulation of mitosis 12 Dissecting the network 13 Anaphase entry 14 Checkpoint regulation of mitosis 15 Regulation of cytokinesis 16
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ATM and ATR Substrate Analysis Reveals Extensive Protein Networks Responsive to DNA Damage
Matsuoka, S., Ballif, B. A., Smogorzewska, A., McDonald, E. R., Hurov, K. E., Luo, J., Bakalarski, C. E., Zhao, Z., Solimini, N., Lerenthal, Y., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1140321 · Cited by 3,075
Cell-cycle checkpoints and cancer
Kastan, M. B., & Bartek, J. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03097 · Cited by 2,836
Requirement for p53 and p21 to Sustain G 2 Arrest After DNA Damage
Bunz, F., Dutriaux, A., Lengauer, C., Waldman, T., Zhou, S., Brown, J. P., Sedivy, J. M., Kinzler, K. W., & Vogelstein, B. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5393.1497 · Cited by 2,803
ATM and related protein kinases: safeguarding genome integrity
Shiloh, Y. (2003) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1011 · Cited by 2,577
The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time
Musacchio, A., & Salmon, E. D. (2007) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2163 · Cited by 2,227
ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity
Cimprich, K. A., & Cortez, D. (2008) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2450 · Cited by 1,798
The DNA Damage Response: Ten Years After
Harper, J. W., & Elledge, S. J. (2007) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.015 · Cited by 1,705
Bonner, W. M., Redon, C. E., Dickey, J. S., Nakamura, A. J., Sedelnikova, O. A., Solier, S., & Pommier, Y. (2008) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2523 · Cited by 1,623
Beausoleil, S. A., Villén, J., Gerber, S. A., Rush, J., & Gygi, S. P. (2006) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1240 · Cited by 1,577
MDC1 is a mediator of the mammalian DNA damage checkpoint
Stewart, G. S., Wang, B., Bignell, C. R., Taylor, A. M. R., & Elledge, S. J. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01446 · Cited by 874
Cited by
Sever, R., & Brugge, J. S. (2015) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a006098 · Cited by 989
Ionizing Radiation-Induced DNA Damage, Response, and Repair
Santivasi, W. L., & Xia, F. (2014) · Antioxidants & Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2013.5668 · Cited by 593
Artemisinins: Pharmacological actions beyond anti-malarial
Ho, W. E., Peh, H. Y., Chan, T. K., & Wong, W. S. F. (2014) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.12.001 · Cited by 481
The circadian clock in cancer development and therapy
Fu, L., & Kettner, N. M. (2013) · Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-396971-2.00009-9 · Cited by 251
Cellular Reorganization during Mitotic Entry
Champion, L., Linder, M. I., & Kutay, U. (2017) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2016.07.004 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Rhind, N., & Russell, P.
- Venue
- Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2012-10-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- a005942-a005942
- ISSN
- 1943-0264 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2114822038
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 17
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Signaling Pathways that Regulate Cell Division. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1101/cshperspect.a005942
- The paper
- Rhind, N., & Russell, P. (2012). Signaling Pathways that Regulate Cell Division. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a005942
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.