Cited by 53Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingProtein Tyrosine PhosphatasesMelanoma and MAPK Pathways

MRAS: A Close but Understudied Member of the RAS Family

Open access
Young, Lucy C., Rodriguez-Viciana, Pablo·2018·Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine

Abstract

MRAS is the closest relative to the classical RAS oncoproteins and shares most regulatory and effector interactions. However, it also has unique functions, including its ability to function as a phosphatase regulatory subunit when in complex with SHOC2 and protein phosphatase 1 (PP1). This phosphatase complex regulates a crucial step in the activation cycle of RAF kinases and provides a key coordinate input required for efficient ERK pathway activation and transformation by RAS. MRAS mutations rarely occur in cancer but deregulated expression may play a role in tumorigenesis in some settings. Activating mutations in MRAS (as well as SHOC2 and PP1) do occur in the RASopathy Noonan syndrome, underscoring a key role for MRAS within the RAS-ERK pathway. MRAS also has unique roles in cell migration and differentiation and has properties consistent with a key role in the regulation of cell polarity. Further investigations should shed light on what remains a relatively understudied RAS family member.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/cshperspect.a033621

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Young, L. C., & Rodriguez-Viciana, P.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine
Published
2018-01-08
Volume
8
Issue
12
Pages
a033621
ISSN
2157-1422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2784165555
Cited by
53
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
Keywords
mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, Ras family, Ras/ERK pathway, SHOC2, protein phosphatase 1, Noonan syndrome, RASopathies, cell polarity, cell migration, cell differentiation, carcinogenesis, oncogenic mutations
MeSH terms
Cell Differentiation, Cell Movement, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Noonan Syndrome, Signal Transduction, Cell Polarity, ras Proteins, MAP Kinase Signaling System, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins, Protein Phosphatase 1, Carcinogenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review