Cited by 381Cancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismRedox biology and oxidative stressKruppel-like factors research

The biology of hypoxia: the role of oxygen sensing in development, normal function, and disease

Open access
Giaccia, Amato J., Simon, M. Celeste, Johnson, Randall·2004·Genes & Development

Abstract

The ability to sense and respond to changes in oxygen is essential for the survival of prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms. Oxygen-sensing mechanisms have been developed to maintain cell and tissue homeostasis, as well as to adapt to the chronic low-oxygen conditions found in diseases such as cancer. This report on the first Keystone Meeting on the Biology of Hypoxia will summarize our current understanding of key genes and pathways involved in oxygen sensing that are required for normal development and that are dysregulated in disease states. It will also comment on future directions for this exciting field.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gad.1243304

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gorr, T.A., Tomita, T., Wappner, P., and Bunn, H.F. 2004. Regu- lation of Drosophila HIF activity in SL2 cells: Identification of a hypoxia-induced variant isoform of the HIFa homologue gene similar. J. Biol. Chem. (in press).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Giaccia, A. J., Simon, M. C., & Johnson, R.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Venue
Genes & Development
Published
2004-09-15
Volume
18
Issue
18
Pages
2183-2194
ISSN
  • 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5477
OpenAlex
W2152395959
Cited by
380
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 14
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genes & Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Northwestern University
  • Universität Zürich
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Kruppel-like factors research
Keywords
hypoxia, oxygen sensing, hypoxia-inducible factor, oxygen homeostasis, development (biology), cancer, disease, low oxygen environment, gene expression regulation
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Hypoxia, Enzymes, Humans, Ion Channels, Mitochondria, Neoplasms, Oxygen, Reference Values, Protein Biosynthesis, Reactive Oxygen Species, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review