The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multifactorial contributions to an acute DNA damage response by BRCA1/BARD1-containing complexes
Open accessAbstract
The BRCA1 gene product and its stoichiometric binding partner, BARD1, play a vital role in the cellular response to DNA damage. However, how they acquire specific biochemical functions after DNA damage is poorly understood. Following exposure to genotoxic stress, DNA damage-specific interactions were observed between BRCA1/BARD1 and the DNA damage-response proteins, TopBP1 and Mre11/Rad50/NBS1. Two distinct DNA damage-dependent super complexes emerged; their activation was dependent, in part, on the actions of specific checkpoint kinases, and each super complex contributed to a distinctive aspect of the DNA damage response. The results support a new, multifactorial model that describes how genotoxic stress enables BRCA1 to execute a diverse set of DNA damage-response functions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Three proteins, Abraxas (also known as Abra1, FAM175A, CCDC98), Bach1 (also known as Brip1, FancJ) and CtIP (also known as RBBP8), directly interact with the BRCA1 BRCT domains through the pSPxF motif in a phosphorylation-dependent manner forming mutually exclusive complexes, which were thus named as the A, B and C complexes of BRCA1 (Greenberg et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2007; Liu et al., 2007;”
From The BRCA1-Interacting Protein Abraxas Is Required for Genomic Stability and Tumor Suppression (2014) · cites this paper as Greenberg et al., 2006
In the citing paper
“FANCJ helicase activity induced in S phase is also required for FANCJ to promote S phase progression and possibly intra-S phase checkpoints [71,72].”
From Hereditary Breast Cancer and the BRCA1-Associated FANCJ/BACH1/BRIP1 (2011) · cites this paper as [72]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genetic instabilities in human cancers
Lengauer, C., Kinzler, K. W., & Vogelstein, B. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/25292 · Cited by 4,168 · cited 1×
“Testament to this relationship is the observation that a significant fraction of inherited cancer syndromes stem from germline mutations in DNA repair and checkpoint control genes (Lengauer et al. 1998; Vessey et al. 1999).”
BackgroundThe DNA damage response: putting checkpoints in perspective
Zhou, B.-B. S., & Elledge, S. J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35044005 · Cited by 3,213
DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis
Bartkova, J., Hořejší, Z., Koed, K., Krämer, A., Tort, F., Zieger, K., Guldberg, P., Sehested, M., Nesland, J. M., Lukas, C., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03482 · Cited by 2,688
Megabase Chromatin Domains Involved in DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Vivo
Rogakou, E. P., Boon, C., Redon, C., & Bonner, W. M. (1999) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.146.5.905 · Cited by 2,422
Breast and Ovarian Cancer Risks Due to Inherited Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2
King, M.-C., Marks, J. H., & Mandell, J. B. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1088759 · Cited by 2,229
Activation of the DNA damage checkpoint and genomic instability in human precancerous lesions
Gorgoulis, V. G., Vassiliou, L.-V. F., Karakaidos, P., Zacharatos, P., Kotsinas, A., Liloglou, T., Venere, M., DiTullio, R. A., Kastrinakis, N. G., Levy, B., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03485 · Cited by 2,009
Cancer Susceptibility and the Functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2
Venkitaraman, A. R. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00615-3 · Cited by 1,713
Chk1 and Chk2 kinases in checkpoint control and cancer
Bartek, J., & Lukas, J. (2003) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/s1535-6108(03)00110-7 · Cited by 1,513
Association of BRCA1 with Rad51 in Mitotic and Meiotic Cells
Scully, R., Chen, J., Plug, A., Xiao, Y., Weaver, D., Feunteun, J., Ashley, T., & Livingston, D. M. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81847-4 · Cited by 1,459
Self-citationBrca1 Controls Homology-Directed DNA Repair
Moynahan, M. E., Chiu, J. W., Koller, B. H., & Jasin, M. (1999) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80202-6 · Cited by 1,245
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- 1998, Cancer Res., 58, 4375
- 1999, Cancer Res., 59, 4375
- 2002, Cancer Res., 62, 4588
- 2003, Cancer Res., 63, 3049
- 2002, Nat. Genet., 11, 11
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–307 of 307
DNA end-resection is stimulated by an interaction between BRCA1 exon 11 and TOPBP1
Alonso, M. S. M., Kampen, R. A., Schreuder, A., Salas‐Lloret, D., de Ru, A. H., Garzero, V., Mesman, R. L. S., González‐Prieto, R., van Veelen, P. A., & Noordermeer, S. M. (2026) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/s44319-026-00904-3
Double strand break repair within constitutive heterochromatin
Tsouroula, A. (2017) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/6345eaa6z96c3z47bdz8b53zab2527ff8785
Rodrigues, M. J. (2018) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/5324f18az84f8z46d5z8365zd1bc1666321d
Molecular characterization of rare thoraco-abdominal tumours
Leblay, N. (2018) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/b1420e21z6ee9z4986z8438zd763ba0d8c22
Origins of Cellular Lethality Resulting From a Defect in Homologous Recombination in Human Cells
THOMAS, M. L. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/294f7c6bz644bz42ddz8fb3zffd32551bc76
The interaction of CtIP with DNA damage response proteins
Abramowiçz, I. (2010) · University of Birmingham Institutional Research Archive (University of Birmingham)
Metadata
- Authors
- Greenberg, R. A., Sobhian, B., Pathania, S., Cantor, S. B., Nakatani, Y., & Livingston, D. M.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Genes & Development
- Publisher
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
- Published
- 2006-01-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 34-46
- ISSN
- 0890-9369 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-5477
- PMC
- PMC1356099
- OpenAlex
- W2164458581
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 22
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Genes & Development (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Leukemia Research Foundation
- Broad Institute
- Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften
- National Cancer Institute
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › BRCA gene mutations in cancer
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
- Keywords
- BRCA1, BARD1, DNA damage response, TopBP1, Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1, checkpoint kinase, genotoxic stress
- MeSH terms
- MRE11 Homologue Protein, Carrier Proteins, Cell Cycle, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, DNA-Binding Proteins, Humans, Nuclear Proteins, Protein Binding, Acid Anhydride Hydrolases, Cell Cycle Proteins, BRCA1 Protein, Tumor Suppressor Proteins, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, DNA Repair Enzymes, Cell Line, Tumor
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
