Cited by 33

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Widespread cis-regulatory convergence between the extinct Tasmanian tiger and gray wolf

Feigin, Charles Y., Newton, Axel H., Pask, Andrew J.·2019·Genome Research

Abstract

The extinct marsupial Tasmanian tiger, or thylacine, and the eutherian gray wolf are among the most widely recognized examples of convergent evolution in mammals. Despite being distantly related, these large predators independently evolved extremely similar craniofacial morphologies, and evidence suggests that they filled similar ecological niches. Previous analyses revealed little evidence of adaptive convergence between their protein-coding genes. Thus, the genetic basis of their convergence is still unclear. Here, we identified candidate craniofacial cis-regulatory elements across vertebrates and compared their evolutionary rates in the thylacine and wolf, revealing abundant signatures of convergent positive selection. Craniofacial thylacine–wolf accelerated regions were enriched near genes involved in TGF beta (TGFB) and BMP signaling, both of which are key morphological signaling pathways with critical roles in establishing the identities and boundaries between craniofacial tissues. Similarly, enhancers of genes involved in craniofacial nerve development showed convergent selection and involvement in these pathways. Taken together, these results suggest that adaptation in cis-regulators of TGF beta and BMP signaling may provide a mechanism to explain the coevolution of developmentally and functionally integrated craniofacial structures in these species. We also found that despite major structural differences in marsupial and eutherian brains, accelerated regions in both species were common near genes with roles in brain development. Our findings support the hypothesis that, relative to protein-coding genes, positive selection on cis-regulatory elements is likely to be an essential driver of adaptive convergent evolution and may underpin thylacine–wolf phenotypic similarities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.244251.118

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PhyloG2P studies have revealed genetic replication in noncoding regions when it was not found in coding regions.

    “Similarly, PhyloG2P studies have revealed the presence of genetic replication in noncoding regions when it was not found in coding regions (Langer et al. 2018; Feigin et al. 2019; Thomas et al. 2024; Shakya et al. 2025).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 95

  1. 10.1101/gr.124123.111 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.06.002 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1371/journal.pone.0168993 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/s41559-017-0377-2 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/nature05634 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1093/nar/gkw1040 · DOI
  8. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005738 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003684 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1371/journal.pone.0036789 · DOI
  11. 10.1071/ZO09102 · DOI
  12. 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.1.68 · DOI
  13. 10.1073/pnas.1110416108 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2007.08.004 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0070-2153(05)66003-6 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.05.030 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/ng.3537 · DOI
  18. 2010, Myostatin (GDF-8) as a key factor linking muscle mass and bone structure, J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact, 10, 56
  19. 10.1038/nature11247 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.3.383 · DOI
  21. 10.1038/s41559-017-0417-y · DOI
  22. 10.1038/nrg2199 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/nar/gkw1073 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/nar/gks1236 · DOI
  25. 10.1074/jbc.M117.782128 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2008.09.004 · DOI
  27. 10.1126/science.1104935 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.02.046 · DOI
  29. 10.1002/ar.a.10044 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.mod.2014.12.005 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.07.010 · DOI
  32. 10.1371/journal.pone.0091172 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/S0925-4773(97)00057-9 · DOI
  34. 10.1093/bib/bbq072 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.007 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/s41588-018-0153-5 · DOI
  37. 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1998.tb00152.x · DOI
  38. 10.1101/gr.7.9.910 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1098/rsos.171539 · DOI
  40. 10.1093/nar/gkf436 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1093/molbev/msr279 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1093/nar/gkw377 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1016/S1357-2725(97)00085-X · DOI
  44. 10.1093/carcin/bgn199 · DOI
  45. 10.1101/gr.121905.111 · DOI
  46. 10.1371/journal.pone.0034877 · DOI
  47. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1038/35097509 · DOI
  49. 10.1038/374356a0 · DOI
  50. 10.1038/nbt.1630 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1002/ar.20852 · DOI
  52. 10.1101/gr.210930.116 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.065 · DOI
  54. 10.1098/rsos.171914 · DOI
  55. 10.1359/jbmr.2004.19.1.111 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.09.089 · DOI
  57. 10.1007/s00018-013-1549-0 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.09.004 · DOI
  59. 10.7554/eLife.25884 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1038/nature05113 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1101/gr.097857.109 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1101/gr.116814.110 · DOI
  63. 10.1242/dev.027342 · DOI
  64. 10.1074/jbc.M116.770941 · DOI
  65. 10.1016/j.mcn.2015.06.004 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1016/j.matbio.2015.05.005 · DOI
  67. 10.1159/000132101 · DOI
  68. 2004, Distributions of exons and introns in the human genome, In Silico Biol, 4, 387
  69. 10.1016/j.bone.2015.05.023 · DOI
  70. 2004, Constraints on the morphological evolution of marsupial shoulder girdles, Evolution, 58, 2353
  71. 10.1016/S0012-1606(02)00022-2 · DOI
  72. 10.1101/gr.1239303 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1093/molbev/msh039 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2009.10.010 · DOI
  75. 10.1093/nar/gkv1275 · DOI
  76. 10.1038/nrg3207 · DOI · Paper page
  77. 10.1101/gr.361602 · DOI
  78. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00450.x · DOI
  79. 10.1371/journal.pone.0184450 · DOI
  80. 10.1093/nar/gkw937 · DOI · Paper page
  81. 10.1038/onc.2015.13 · DOI
  82. 10.1093/gbe/evy013 · DOI
  83. 10.1177/154405910708601109 · DOI
  84. 10.1038/nrg1914 · DOI
  85. 10.1093/nar/gkl822 · DOI · Paper page
  86. 10.1038/nature07730 · DOI · Paper page
  87. 10.3748/wjg.v23.i13.2330 · DOI
  88. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00101.x · DOI
  89. 10.1098/rspb.2007.0906 · DOI
  90. 10.1038/boneres.2016.9 · DOI · Paper page
  91. 10.18632/oncotarget.16531 · DOI
  92. 10.1507/endocrj.EJ12-0022 · DOI
  93. 10.1073/pnas.0500031102 · DOI
  94. 10.1016/j.stem.2013.12.013 · DOI
  95. 10.1186/1471-2164-10-47 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Feigin, C. Y., Newton, A. H., & Pask, A. J.
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2019-09-18
Volume
29
Issue
10
Pages
1648-1658
ISSN
  • 1088-9051
  • 1549-5469
Cited by
33
References
9
Language
en
Funders
Australian Research Council (FT140100964)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review