Cited by 98

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deficiency of nucleotide excision repair is associated with mutational signature observed in cancer

Jager, Myrthe, Blokzijl, Francis, Kuijk, Ewart, Bertl, Johanna, Vougioukalaki, Maria, Janssen, Roel, Besselink, Nicolle, Boymans, Sander, de Ligt, Joep, Pedersen, Jakob Skou, Hoeijmakers, Jan, Pothof, Joris, van Boxtel, Ruben, Cuppen, Edwin·2019·Genome Research

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is one of the main DNA repair pathways that protect cells against genomic damage. Disruption of this pathway can contribute to the development of cancer and accelerate aging. Mutational characteristics of NER-deficiency may reveal important diagnostic opportunities, as tumors deficient in NER are more sensitive to certain treatments. Here, we analyzed the genome-wide somatic mutational profiles of adult stem cells (ASCs) from NER-deficient Ercc1 −/Δ mice. Our results indicate that NER-deficiency increases the base substitution load twofold in liver but not in small intestinal ASCs, which coincides with the tissue-specific aging pathology observed in these mice. Moreover, NER-deficient ASCs of both tissues show an increased contribution of Signature 8 mutations, which is a mutational pattern with unknown etiology that is recurrently observed in various cancer types. The scattered genomic distribution of the base substitutions indicates that deficiency of global-genome NER (GG-NER) underlies the observed mutational consequences. In line with this, we observe increased Signature 8 mutations in a GG-NER-deficient human organoid culture, in which XPC was deleted using CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing. Furthermore, genomes of NER-deficient breast tumors show an increased contribution of Signature 8 mutations compared with NER-proficient tumors. Elevated levels of Signature 8 mutations could therefore contribute to a predictor of NER-deficiency based on a patient's mutational profile.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/gr.246223.118

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Far less is known about somatic mutation in other species than in humans.

    “With the exception of some initial studies, far less is known about somatic mutation in other species1–7.”

    From Somatic mutation rates scale with lifespan across mammals (2022) · cites this paper as [5]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90289-9 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.stem.2015.05.002 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/nature12477 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1038/ng.3441 · DOI
  5. 10.1101/322859 · DOI
  6. 10.1093/nar/gkm888 · DOI
  7. 10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1038/nature07602 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/nature13448 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1073/pnas.1000193107 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr670 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/sj.leu.2404376 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/nm.4292 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1093/nar/gkt671 · DOI
  16. 10.1093/nar/26.18.4146 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.11.008 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2014.08.007 · DOI
  19. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti525 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/nprot.2009.97 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/hep.24713 · DOI
  22. 10.1056/NEJMra0804615 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1101/gr.220038.116 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/carcin/16.4.883 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/ng.3557 · DOI
  26. 2010, Multiple roles of the ERCC1-XPF endonuclease in DNA repair and resistance to anticancer drugs, Anticancer Res, 30, 3223
  27. 10.1038/srep22154 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/nar/gkf478 · DOI
  29. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6067 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/srep04112 · DOI
  31. 10.1038/nature05456 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1038/nature17437 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/s00018-015-2075-z · DOI
  34. 10.1002/em.20583 · DOI
  35. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts378 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/nbt.1754 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1038/377162a0 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/nature07935 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80155-5 · DOI
  40. 10.1093/nar/24.17.3370 · DOI
  41. 10.1074/jbc.M111.337899 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.str.2005.08.014 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00190-4 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.031 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.07.045 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/s41467-018-04052-8 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jager, M., Blokzijl, F., Kuijk, E., Bertl, J., Vougioukalaki, M., Janssen, R., Besselink, N., Boymans, S., de Ligt, J., Pedersen, J. S., Hoeijmakers, J., Pothof, J., van Boxtel, R., & Cuppen, E.
Venue
Genome Research
Published
2019-06-20
Volume
29
Issue
7
Pages
1067-1077
ISSN
  • 1088-9051
  • 1549-5469
Cited by
98
References
16
Language
en
Funders
Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (016.Vidi.171.023)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review