Cited by 89

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effect of insulin and insulin‐like growth factors on hippocampus‐ and amygdala‐dependent long‐term memory formation

Stern, Sarah A., Chen, Dillon Y., Alberini, Cristina M.·2014·Learning & Memory

Abstract

Recent work has reported that the insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2) promotes memory enhancement. Furthermore, impaired insulin or IGF1 functions have been suggested to play a role in the pathogenesis of neurodegeneration and cognitive impairments, hence implicating the insulin/IGF system as an important target for cognitive enhancement and/or the development of novel treatments against cognitive disorders. Here, we tested the effect of intracerebral injections of IGF1, IGF2, or insulin on memory consolidation and persistence in rats. We found that a bilateral injection of insulin into the dorsal hippocampus transiently enhances hippocampal-dependent memory and an injection of IGF1 has no effect. None of the three peptides injected into the amygdala affected memories critically engaging this region. Together with previous data on IGF2, these results indicate that IGF2 produces the most potent and persistent effect as a memory enhancer on hippocampal-dependent memories. We suggest that the memory-enhancing effects of insulin and IGF2 are likely mediated by distinct mechanisms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/lm.029348.112

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Restoring various serum proteins back into the blood will become a major target to restore youthful function into aged tissues, and beneficial proteins with rejuvenation properties include IGF2, GHRH, GnRH, and GDF11.

    “Restoring various serum proteins back into the blood will become a major target to restore youthful function back into aged tissues, and there are many beneficial proteins that hold rejuvenation properties such as insulin growth factor two (IGF2), 60 , 61 growth hormone releasing hormone ((GHRH), 62 gonadotropin releasing hormone GnRH), 63 and growth differentiation factor 11 (GDF11). 64 , 65”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. 2000, Peripheral infusion of IGF-I selectively induces neurogenesis in the adult rat hippocampus, J Neurosci, 20, 2896, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-08-02896.2000 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/emboj.2011.293 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.tins.2011.12.007 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.07.026 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.01.002 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/0006-8993(78)90013-6 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/nn849 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4248-11.2012 · DOI
  9. 2001, Circulating insulin-like growth factor I mediates the protective effects of physical exercise against brain insults of different etiology and anatomy, J Neurosci, 21, 5678, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-15-05678.2001 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1038/nm793 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/nature09667 · DOI
  12. 1971, Effect of hypoglycemia on T-maze learning in rats, Phys Ther, 51, 991, 10.1093/ptj/51.9.991 · DOI
  13. 10.1186/1471-2202-13-110 · DOI
  14. 10.1001/archneurol.2011.233 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1517/17425247.2013.856877 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/s40263-013-0076-8 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.08.005 · DOI
  18. 10.1037/a0017722 · DOI
  19. 10.1371/journal.pone.0021594 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.02.006 · DOI
  21. 10.1210/edrv-16-1-3 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.03.005 · DOI
  23. 1988, Differential responsiveness of human breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and T47D to growth factors and 17 β-estradiol, Cancer Res, 48, 4083
  24. 10.1073/pnas.1311141111 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.06.005 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1007/s00213-012-2841-7 · DOI
  27. 10.1006/nlme.1996.0020 · DOI
  28. 10.1006/nlme.1998.3831 · DOI
  29. 10.1006/nlme.1998.3855 · DOI
  30. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.155 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1016/S0022-510X(01)00532-9 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2004.01.005 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.nlm.2010.02.002 · DOI
  34. 10.1371/journal.pone.0094287 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.06.025 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.08.046 · DOI
  37. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2700-12.2013 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1016/S0031-9384(99)00220-6 · DOI
  39. Paxinos G , Watson C . 2007. The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. Elsevier Academic Press, New York.
  40. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2005.03.016 · DOI
  41. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000265401.62434.36 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0111-12.2012 · DOI
  43. 10.1007/s12035-011-8229-6 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/0143-4179(89)90002-4 · DOI
  45. 10.1038/npp.2014.69 · DOI
  46. 10.1038/90520 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.ecl.2012.04.016 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.09.009 · DOI
  49. 10.1073/pnas.0812394106 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1038/tp.2013.102 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Stern, S. A., Chen, D. Y., & Alberini, C. M.
Venue
Learning & Memory
Published
2014-09-16
Volume
21
Issue
10
Pages
556-563
ISSN
1549-5485
Cited by
89
References
8
Language
en
Funders
US National Institute of Mental Health (R01/R37-MH065635, F31-MH090636, F31-MH816213)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review