Cited by 636Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

Neural circuits and mechanisms involved in Pavlovian fear conditioning: A critical review

Open access
Kim, Jeansok J., Jung, Min Whan·2006·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

Pavlovian or classical fear conditioning is recognized as a model system to investigate the neurobiological mechanisms of learning and memory in the mammalian brain and to understand the root of fear-related disorders in humans. In recent decades, important progress has been made in delineating the essential neural circuitry and cellular-molecular mechanisms of fear conditioning. Converging lines of evidence indicate that the amygdala is necessarily involved in the acquisition, storage and expression of conditioned fear memory, and long-term potentiation (LTP) in the lateral nucleus of the amygdala is often proposed as the underlying synaptic mechanism of associative fear memory. Recent studies further implicate the prefrontal cortex-amygdala interaction in the extinction (or inhibition) of conditioned fear. Despite these advances, there are unresolved issues and findings that challenge the validity and sufficiency of the current amygdalar LTP hypothesis of fear conditioning. The purpose of this review is to critically evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of evidence indicating that fear conditioning depend crucially upon the amygdalar circuit and plasticity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.06.005

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Context-associated memory deficit is typical in AD patients and manifested as dysfunction of fear conditioning involving neural circuits of the amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex.

    “Context-associated memory: This deficit is typical in AD patients [128][129][130] and manifested as dysfunction of fear conditioning 82 involving neural circuits of the amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex 131,132 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, J. J., & Jung, M. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Ajou University (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Jeansok J.
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
188-202
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155158396
Cited by
636
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 39
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • AJOU Open Repository (Ajou University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH64457, R01MH064457)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
fear conditioning, amygdala, long-term potentiation, lateral amygdala, fear extinction, conditioned fear memory, synaptic plasticity, neural circuits, fear-related disorders
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Association Learning, Avoidance Learning, Brain, Conditioning, Classical, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Memory, Neural Pathways, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review