Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparing, optimizing, and benchmarking quantum-control algorithms in a unifying programming framework

Open access
Machnes, S., Sander, U., Glaser, S. J., de Fouquières, P., Gruslys, A., Schirmer, S., Schulte-Herbrüggen, T.·2011·Physical Review A

Abstract

For paving the way to novel applications in quantum simulation, computation, and technology, increasingly large quantum systems have to be steered with high precision. It is a typical task amenable to numerical optimal control to turn the time course of pulses, i.e., piecewise constant control amplitudes, iteratively into an optimized shape. Here, we present a comparative study of optimal-control algorithms for a wide range of finite-dimensional applications. We focus on the most commonly used algorithms: GRAPE methods which update all controls concurrently, and Krotov-type methods which do so sequentially. Guidelines for their use are given and open research questions are pointed out. Moreover, we introduce a unifying algorithmic framework, DYNAMO (dynamic optimization platform), designed to provide the quantum-technology community with a convenient matlab-based tool set for optimal control. In addition, it gives researchers in optimal-control techniques a framework for benchmarking and comparing newly proposed algorithms with the state of the art. It allows a mix-and-match approach with various types of gradients, update and step-size methods as well as subspace choices. Open-source code including examples is made available at http://qlib.info.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physreva.84.022305

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 87

  1. 10.1098/rsta.2003.1227 · DOI · Paper page
  2. H. M. Wiseman, 2009, Quantum Measurement and Control, 10.1017/CBO9780511813948 · DOI · Paper page
  3. A. G. Butkovskiy, 1990, Control of Quantum-Mechanical Processes and Systems, 10.1007/978-94-009-1994-5 · DOI · Paper page
  4. A. G. Butkovskiy, 1979, Autom. Remote Control (USSR), 40, 485
  5. A. G. Butkovskiy, 1979, Autom. Remote Control (USSR), 40, 629
  6. A. G. Butkovskiy, 1980, Dokl. Akad. Nauk. USSR, 250, 22
  7. 10.1063/1.449767 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevA.37.4950 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevA.42.1065 · DOI
  10. 10.1073/pnas.2134111100 · DOI
  11. 10.1063/1.1665486 · DOI
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevA.74.022306 · DOI
  13. V. F. Krotov, 1996, Global Methods in Optimal Control
  14. 10.1103/PhysRevA.72.042331 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1103/RevModPhys.80.885 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.157901 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevA.71.062309 · DOI
  18. 10.1088/1464-4266/7/10/020 · DOI
  19. 10.1038/nature07125 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1088/0953-4075/42/15/154009 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1038/463037a · DOI
  22. 10.1038/nature08005 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1038/nature08121 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.2609 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/nature07128 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevA.75.012302 · DOI
  27. 10.1088/0953-4075/44/15/154013 · DOI
  28. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.3306 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.042307 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1088/1367-2630/11/10/105032 · DOI
  31. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.080501 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.032314 · DOI
  33. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.190501 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.022108 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.188301 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1103/PhysRevA.68.062308 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1063/1.1650297 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.chemphys.2005.08.015 · DOI
  39. 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.022332 · DOI
  40. 10.1088/0953-4075/40/9/S06 · DOI
  41. 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.030301 · DOI
  42. 10.1080/09500340802344933 · DOI
  43. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.110501 · DOI · Paper page
  44. D. D’Alessandro, 2008, Introduction to Quantum Control and Dynamics, 10.1201/9781584888833 · DOI · Paper page
  45. V. F. Krotov, 1983, Eng. Cybern., 21, 123
  46. V. F. Krotov, 1983, Izv. Akad. Nauk. SSSR Tekh. Kibern., 1983, 162
  47. A. I. Konnov, 1999, Autom. Remote Control, 60, 1427
  48. A. I. Konnov, 1999, Avtom. Telemekh., 1999, 77
  49. 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.063426 · doi:10.1103/physreva.81.063426
  50. 10.1103/PhysRevA.82.043437 · DOI
  51. 10.1103/PhysRevA.77.052334 · DOI
  52. 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.012312 · DOI
  53. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.085328 · DOI
  54. J. Nocedal, 2006, Numerical Optimization, 10.1007/b98874 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1007/11823285_78 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/0022-0396(72)90007-1 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1103/PhysRevA.54.1715 · DOI
  58. 10.1103/PhysRevA.63.063410 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1088/0305-4470/35/9/319 · doi:10.1088/0305-4470/35/9/319
  60. 10.1109/TAC.2003.815027 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1016/S0034-4877(09)90022-2 · DOI
  62. 10.2307/2318209 · doi:10.2307/2318209
  63. E. B. Bliss, 1946, Lectures on the Calculus of Variations
  64. R. A. Horn, 1991, Topics in Matrix Analysis, 10.1017/CBO9780511840371 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 10.1090/S0025-5718-1980-0572855-7 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1007/BF01582063 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1137/090763172 · DOI
  68. 10.1137/0916069 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1088/1367-2630/13/7/073029 · DOI
  70. 10.1006/jmra.1996.0157 · DOI
  71. 10.1063/1.1724318 · doi:10.1063/1.1724318
  72. 10.1063/1.1705306 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1137/1020098 · DOI · Paper page
  74. T. Schulte-Herbrüggen, 2008, High-Performance Computing in Science and Engineering, Garching 2007
  75. R. A. Horn, 1987, Matrix Analysis
  76. 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.052324 · DOI
  77. 10.1126/science.1157233 · DOI · Paper page
  78. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.207901 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/135 · DOI
  80. 10.1080/00107510701342313 · DOI · Paper page
  81. 10.1142/S0219749910006514 · DOI · Paper page
  82. 10.1016/j.optcom.2009.10.059 · DOI
  83. F. Mezzadri, 2007, Notices Amer. Math. Soc., 54, 592
  84. 10.1063/1.3267086 · DOI
  85. 10.1016/j.jmr.2007.09.014 · DOI
  86. 10.1137/030601880 · doi:10.1137/030601880
  87. W. W. Hager, 2006, Pac. J. Optim., 2, 35

Cited by

See all 267

Metadata

Authors
Machnes, S., Sander, U., Glaser, S. J., de Fouquières, P., Gruslys, A., Schirmer, S., & Schulte-Herbrüggen, T.
Venue
Physical Review A
Published
2011-08-03
Volume
84
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0556-2791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1050-2947
  • 1094-1622
OpenAlex
W2166978156
Cited by
267
References
7
FWCI
13.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing, optimizing, and benchmarking quantum-control algorithms in a unifying programming framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreva.84.022305
The paper
Machnes, S., Sander, U., Glaser, S. J., de Fouquières, P., Gruslys, A., Schirmer, S., & Schulte-Herbrüggen, T. (2011). Comparing, optimizing, and benchmarking quantum-control algorithms in a unifying programming framework. Physical Review A. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.84.022305

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.